The alleged 'social revolution' in Egypt: The dispute and conflict between Vassily Struve and Solomon Lurye in the 1920s
Institutes and Faculties
Main page \ Research and Innovations \ Publications \ Publishing activities of KFU \ Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta \ Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki \ Archive

The alleged 'social revolution' in Egypt: The dispute and conflict between Vassily Struve and Solomon Lurye in the 1920s

I.A. Ladynin

Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991 Russia

E-mail: ladynin@mail.ru

Received September 12, 2021

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.6.127-143

For citation: Ladynin I.A. The alleged “social revolution” in Egypt: The dispute and conflict between Vassily Struve and Solomon Lurye in the 1920s. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2021, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 127–143. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.6.127-143. (In Russian)

Abstract

The article considers an episode of the Leningrad academic life in the 1920s, the dispute between the Egyptologist Vassily Struve and the Classicist Solomon Lurye (Salomo Luria) on the problem of the alleged “social revolution” in Ancient Egypt. Such interpretation of a few Ancient Egyptian texts (first of all, The Admonitions of Ipuwer and The Prophecy of Neferty) was forwarded by V. Struve not later than in 1919; it was connected with the interpretations of his teacher Boris Turaev and of the German Egyptologist Kurth Sethe and largely coincided with the vision of these texts by Adolf Erman, the leader of the German Egyptological school at the beginning of 20th century. In the early 1920s, this hypothesis was met with strong objections by S. Lurye, who denied the historical message of the texts. The dispute turned into a conflict caused by S. Lurye’s accusations of plagiarism against V. Struve. Symptomatically, the background both for this dispute and the conflict that followed could be the difference between the attitudes of V. Struve and S. Lurye towards the Russian revolution: S. Lurye welcomed it (especially its stage between February and October 1917), while B. Turaev and, at that time, his pupil V. Struve saw in it, first of all, a great upheaval (the same must be true about A. Erman’s attitude towards the German revolution of 1918). The article publishes the detailed drafts of V. Struve’s response to S. Lurye’s accusations.

Keywords: Solomon Lurye, Vassily Struve, Egypt, “social revolution”, The Admonitions of Ipuwer, The Prophesy of Neferty, dispute, plagiarism

Acknowledgments. The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 20-09-41014).

References

  1. Koprzhiva-Lurye B.Ya. Istoriya odnoi zhizni [A Story of a Life]. Paris, Atheneum, 1987. 267 p. (In Russian)
  2. Krikh S.B. V.V. Struve and Marrism. Vestnik Universiteta Dmitriya Pozharskogo, 2016, no. 2, pp. 47–72. (In Russian)
  3. Skvortsov A.A., Mirovshchikova A.A. The ideological struggle in the Leningrad Branch of the Institute of History of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR: The case of S.Ya. Lurie. In: Odissei. Chelovek v istorii. 2017–2018: Svyatoi i obshchestvo: konstruirovanie svyatosti v agiografii i kul’turnoi pamyati [Odysseus. The Man in History. 2017–2018: The Saint and Society: The Construction of Sainthood in Hagiography and Cultural Memory]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, 2019, pp. 438–489. (In Russian)
  4. Anan’ev V.G., Bukharin M.D. The election of S.A. Zhebelev as a full member of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Journal of Modern Russian History and Historiography, 2019, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 5–96. doi: 10.1163/22102388-01201002. (In Russian)
  5. Bukharin M.D. Vasily Struve and formation of categories of Soviet historical science. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Istoriya, 2019, vol. 64, no. 4, рр. 1440–1458. doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2019.418. (In Russian)
  6. Diakonoff I.M. Kniga vospominanii [A Book of Memoirs]. St. Petersburg, Evr. Dom, 1995. 766 p. (In Russian)
  7. Formozov A.A. Russkie arkheologi v period totalitarizma [Russian Archaeologists of Totalitarian Period. Historiographical Studies]. Moscow, Znak, 2006. 344 p. (In Russian)
  8. Steblin-Kamenskii I.M. Anecdotes about Orientalists. Scripta gregoriana: Sb. v chest’ semidesyatiletiya akademika G.M. Bongard-Levina [Scripta gregoriana: A Collection of Papers in Honor of the 70th Birth Anniversary of Academician G.M. Bongard-Levin]. Moscow, Vost. Lit., 2003, pp. 470–486. (In Russian)
  9. Ladynin I.A. Lectures of Solomon Iakovlevich Lur’e in the Russian Palestinian Society. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya, 2020, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1272–1287. doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu02.2020.416. (In Russian)
  10. Ladynin I.A. “The Egyptian Bible”: Alternatives to the pre-revolutionary research paradigm in S.Ya. Lurye’s works of 1920s. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 42–55. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.3.42-55. (In Russian)
  11. Il’in-Tomich A.A., Safronov A.V. Dating and historical circumstances of the Admonitions of Ipuwer. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 2010, no. 4, pp. 3–22. (In Russian)
  12. Il’in-Tomich A.A. Social revolution in Egypt in the works by V.V. Struve. Vestnik Universiteta Dmitriya Pozharskogo, 2016, no. 2, pp. 35–47. (In Russian)
  13. Bukharin M.D., Anan’ev V.G. V.V. Struve and the Institute of the History of Arts (on the hypothesis of social revolution in Ancient Egypt). Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 2018, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 970–987. doi: 10.31857/S032103910002915-9. (In Russian)
  14. Vydayushchiisya russkii vostokoved V.S. Golenishchev i istoriya priobreteniya ego kollektsii v Muzei izyashchnykh iskusstv (1909–1912) [Outstanding Russian Orientalist V.S. Golenishchev and the Acquisition of His Collection for the Museum of Fine Arts (1909–1912)]. Moscow, Sov. Khudozhnik, 1987. 344 p. (In Russian)
  15. Miliband S.D. Vostokovedy Rossii (XX – nachalo XXI veka). Biobibliograficheskii slovar’ [Russian Orientalists of the 20th and Early 21st Centuries: Bio-Bibliographical Reference Book]. Book 2. Moscow, Vost. Lit. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2008. 1100 p. (In Russian)
  16. Bogoslovskii E.S. Materials on the study of the research by A.V. Schmidt in the Perm University (1917–1924). Trudy Kamskoi Arkheologicheskoi Ekspeditsii [Works of the Kama Archaeological Expedition]. Perm, Izd. Permsk. Univ., 1968, no. IV, pp. 146–156. (In Russian)
  17. Enmarch R. A World Upturned: Commentary on and Analysis of the Dialogue of Ipuwer and the Lord of All. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 2008. X, 294 p.
  18. Gardiner A.H. The Admonitions of an Egyptian Sage from a Hieratic Papyrus in Leiden. Leipzig, Hinrichs, 1909. VII, 116 p.
  19. Turaev B.A. Istoriya drevnego Vostoka [A History of the Ancient Orient]. Vol. 1. Leningrad, OGIZ, Sotsekgiz, 1935. IX, 361 p. (In Russian)
  20. Turaev B.A. Egipetskaya literatura [The Egyptian Literature]. Vol. 1: A historical outline of the Ancient Egyptian literature. Moscow, Izd. M. i S. Sabashnikovykh, 1920. 281 p. (In Russian)
  21. Gardiner A.H. New literary works from Ancient Egypt. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 1914, vol. 1, pp. 20–36, 100–106.
  22. Posener G. Ostraca inédits du Musée de Turin (Recherches littéraires III). Revue d’égyptologie, 1951, vol. 8, pp. 171–189. (In French)
  23. Turaev B.A. Drevnii Egipet [Ancient Egypt]. Petrograd, Ogni, 1922. 177 p. (In Russian)
  24. Erman A. Eine Revolutionszeit im alten Ägypten. Internationale Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft, Kunst und Technik, 1912, N. 6, S. 19–30. (In German)
  25. Erman A. Die Mahnworte eines ägyptischen Propheten. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, 1919, Jg. 42, S. 804–815. (In German)
  26. Meyer Ed. Geschichte des Alterthums. Bd. 1. H. 2: Die ältesten Geschichtlichen Völker und Kulturen bis zum sechzehnten Jahrhundert. Stuttgart, Berlin, J. G. Cotta, 1913. XXVI, 990 S. (In German)
  27. Piotrovskii B.B. Stranitsy moei zhizni [Pages of My Life]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1995. 288 p. (In Russian)
  28. Posener G. Littérature et politique dans l’Égypte de la XIIe dynastie. Paris, H. Champion, 1956. XI, 171 p. (Bibliothèque de l’école des hautes études 307). (In French)
  29. Berlev O.D. Obshchestvennye otnosheniya v Egipte epokhi Srednego tsarstva. Sotsial’nyi sloi “tsarskikh Hmww” [Social Relations in Middle Kingdom Egypt. The Social Strata of the Royal Hmww]. Moscow, Nauka, 1978. 366 p. (In Russian)
  30. Weill R. La fin du Moyen Empire égyptien: étude sur les monuments et l’histoire de la période comprise entre la XIIe et la XVIIIe dynastie. Paris, Impr. Nationale, Picard, 1918. XII, 971 p. (In French)
  31. Levinskaya I.A. Elias (Il’ya) Bikerman: peterburgskii prolog [Elias Bickerman: Petersburg Prologue]. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Ist., 2018. 256 p. (In Russian)
  32. Kinzhalov R.V. Iz proshlogo [From the Past]. St. Petersburg, Svyato-Aleksievskaya Pustyn’, 2012. 238 p. (In Russian)
  33. Bartold V. [Foreword]. In: Zapiski Kollegii Vostokovedov pri Aziatskom Muzee Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk [Memoirs of the Orientalists’ Collegium at the Asiatic Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 1925, vol. 1. (In Russian)
  34. Lacau P. Textes religieux. Recueil de travaux relatifs à la philologie et à l’archéologie égyptiennes et assyriennes, 1907, T. 29, pp. 143–159. (In French)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Вход в личный кабинет
Ваш логин
Ваш пароль
Забыли пароль? Регистрация