Never boring classics: 100 historians in the optics of iconography [Review: Russian Historians. Iconography. 4 Books. Chernobaev A.A. (Ed.). Moscow, Sobranie, 2008–2019. (In Russian)]

V.P. Korzun

Dostoevsky Omsk State University, Omsk, 644077 Russia

E-mail: korzunv@mail.ru

Received March 16, 2020

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.3.248-254

For citation: Korzun V.P. Never boring classics: 100 historians in the optics of iconography [Review: Russian Historians. Iconography. 4 Books. Chernobaev A.A. (Ed.). Moscow, Sobranie, 2008–2019. (In Russian)]. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 248–254. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.3.248-254. (In Russian)

Abstract

The review presents reflections on four books “Russian Historians. Iconography” compiled and edited by A.A. Chernobaev. The books were published in 2008–2019. They described 100 historians in the optics of iconography. V.N. Tatishchev opens the iconographic range, while I.V. Tunkina completes it, for the moment. The structure of the iconographic “texts” is unified. First, a short biographical sketch of one page is given, which is followed by 14–15 pages of engravings (lithographs), photographs with signatures and dating. A short bibliography (the main works published by the historian and the literature about them) is included in the special section of each book. The four-volume edition was analyzed as a complex metahistoriographic text. Its appearance and construction was considered in the mainstream of modern biography and visual turn. Personal motives, appeals of A.A. Chernobaev to this project, and its connection with the experience of the “Historical Archive” journal, in which photographic documents have been actively published since 2000, were studied. The focus of attention was also the scientific program of the project, in which three main areas of research/presentation are distinguished: to visually present three centuries of Russian historiography development; to reflect the disciplinary mosaic of historical science in persons; to present portraits of metropolitan and provincial historians. At the same time, some difficulties in the implementation of this program were indicated. They are associated both with the unevenness of the surviving visual sources and with the insufficient development of the problems of classicalization in modern historiography. The presented iconography significantly expands the scope of the scientist’s formalized questionnaire, which is reflected in a short biographical text (basic biographical data: social origin, education, scientific biography with the inclusion of master’s/candidate’s and doctoral dissertations, career path, list of major works). As a result, the classics of historiography appear not as monuments, but as living people. The visual range clearly highlights the cultural stylistics of various generations of historians.

Keywords: iconography, Russian historians, pantheon of classics, visual turn, biography, history of Russian historical science, A.A. Chernobaev

References

1. Mazur L.N. Visual turn in historical science: From text to image. In: Rol’ izobrazitel’nykh istochnikov v informatsionnom obespechenii istoricheskoi nauki [The Role of Visual Sources in the Informational Support of Historical Science]. Moscow, Inst. Nauchn. Inf. Obshchestv. Naukam Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2019, pp. 52–62. (In Russian)
2. Narskii I.V. Fotokartochka na pamyat’: Semeinye istorii, fotograficheskie poslaniya i sovetskoe detstvo (Avtobio-istorio-graficheskii roman) [A Commemorative Photocard: Family Stories, Photographic Messages, and Soviet Childhood (Autobio- Historio-Graphic Novel)]. Chelyabinsk, OOO “Entsiklopediya”, 2008. 516 p. (In Russian)
3. Chernobaev A.A. Iconography of Russian historians: Its place in historiography. In: Chernobaev A.A. “Gryadushcheye na vse izmenit vzglyad”: Stat’i. Vystupleniya. Publikatsii. 2005–2010 gg. [“The Future Will Change the View of Everything”: Articles. Speeches. Publications. 2005–2010]. Moscow,  Sobranie, 2010, pp. 184–189. (In Russian)
4. Chernobaev A.A. Istoriki Rossii. Kto est’ kto v izuchenii otechestvennoi istorii: Biobibliograficheskii slovar’ [Russian Historians: Who Is Who in the Study of Russian History: Biobibliographic Dictionary]. Saratov, Izd. Tsentr Saratov. Gos. Ekon. Akad., 1998. 440 p. (In Russian)
5. Chernobaev A.A. Istoriki Rossii XX veka: Biobibliograficheskii slovar’ [Russian Historians of the 20th Century: Biobibliographic Dictionary]. Saratov, SGSEU, 2005. Vol. 1, 570 p. Vol. 2, 608 p. (In Russian)
6. Chernobaev A.A. Istoriki Rossii XX veka: Biobibliograficheskii slovar’ [Russian Historians of the 20th Century: Biobibliographic Dictionary]. Vol. 3. St. Petersburg, Nestor, 2009. 267 p. (In Russian)
7. Chernobaev A.A. Istoriki Rossii kontsa XIX – nachala XXI veka: Biobibliograficheskii slovar’ [Russian Historians of the Late 19th – Early 20th Centuries: Biobibliographic Dictionary]. Moscow, Sobranie. Vol. 1, 2016, 511 p. Vol. 2, 2017, 511 p. Vol. 3, 2017, 519 p. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.