Methodology of research on nations and nationalism in modern Russian historiography (based on the concept of Russianness)

A.R. Gimatdinova ^a,b*, N.I. Nedashkovskaya ^a**

^aRussian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, 125993 Russia

^bEksmo Publishing House, Moscow, 123308 Russia

E-mail: ^*737cima@mail.ru, ^**N.Nedashkovskaya@yandex.ru

Received March 11, 2020

Full text PDF
DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.3.232-247

For citation: Gimatdinova A.R., Nedashkovskaya N.I. Methodology of research on nations and nationalism in modern Russian historiography (based on the concept of Russianness). Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 232–247. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.3.232-247. (In Russian)

Abstract

The methodology for studying nations and nationalism in modern Russian historiography was analyzed. The concept of Russianness was considered, and, as a result, it was demonstrated that the scope of tools and methods used in intellectual history can be expanded. The scientific and research discourse of the notions of nation, nationalism, and, in particular, Russianness was outlined. The conceptualization of the latter – in the works by A.I. Miller, M.D. Dolbilov, and E.A. Vishlenkova – was considered. The limits of the concept were defined. Its place in the historiographical notions of nation and nationalism, identity and empire was revealed. The intentions of the authors of historiographic statements were identified based on the works published by the Cambridge School of Intellectual History. The biographical approach was used: the role played by personal views of a researcher, which inevitably humanize the history of historiography, was discussed. Special attention was paid to cognitive metaphors enabling both deconstruction of the meaning of statements and identification of the content of their internal structures, such as ideologemes or frames.

Keywords: nation, nationalism, concept of Russianness, intellectual history, historiography, constructivism, ethnosymbolism

References

1. Barash R.E. Political games in being Russian. In: Natsii i etnichnost’ v gumanitarnykh naukakh. Etnicheskie, natsional’nye i protonatsional’nye narrativy: formirovanie i reprezentatsiya [Nations and Ethnicity in Humanities. Ethnic, National and Protonational Narratives: Formation and Representation]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, 2017, pp. 151–161. (In Russian)
2. Smith A. Natsionalizm i modernizm: Kriticheskii obzor teorii natsii i natsionalizma [Nationalism and Modernism: A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism]. Moscow, Praksis, 2004. 465 p. (In Russian)
3. Nekhaev A.V. Theories of nations and nationalisms: A problem of classification. Omskii Nauchnyi Vestnik. Seriya Obshchestvo. Istoriya. Sovremennost’, 2016, no. 2, pp. 36–45. (In Russian)
4. Yuval-Davis N. Gender and nation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1993, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 621–632. doi: 10.1080/01419870.1993.9993800.
5. Natsionalizm i formirovanie natsii. Teorii – modeli – kontseptsii [Nationalism and Development of Nations. Theories – Models – Concepts]. Moscow, Inst. Slavyanoved. Balkanist. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1994. 198 p. (In Russian)
6. Miller A.I. Imperiya Romanovykh i natsionalizm: Esse po metodologii istoricheskogo issledovaniya [The Empire of the Romanovs and Nationalism: An Essay on Historical Research Methodology]. Moscow, NLO, 2006. 248 p. (In Russian)
7. Brubaker R. Etnichnost’ bez grupp [Ethnicity without Groups]. Moscow, Izd. Dom VShE, 2012. 408 p. (In Russian)
8. Gellner E. Natsii i natsionalizm [Nations and Nationalism]. Moscow, Progress, 1991. 322 p. (In Russian)
9. Miller A.I. Natsiya, ili Mogushchestvo mifa [Nation or the Power of Myth]. St. Petersburg, Izd. Evr. Univ. S.-Peterb., 2016. 146 p. (In Russian)
10. Zapadnye okrainy Rossiiskoi imperii [Western Outskirts of the Russian Empire]. Dolbilov M.D., Miller A.I. (Eds.). Moscow, NLO, 2006. 608 p. (In Russian)
11. Skinner Q. Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. In: Kembridzhskaya shkola: teoriya i praktika intellektual’noi istorii [Cambridge School: Theory and Practice of Intellectual History]. Moscow, NLO, 2018, pp. 53–123. (In Russian)
12. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenie natsionalizma [Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism]. Moscow, Kuchkovo Pole, Kanon-Press-Ts, 2001. 288 p. (In Russian)
13. Hobsbawm E. Natsiya i natsionalizm posle 1780 [Nations and Nationalism since 1780]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, 1998. 308 p. (In Russian)
14. Dolbilov M.D. Russkii krai, chuzhaya vera: Etnokonfessional’naya politika imperii v Litve i Belorussii pri Aleksandre II [Russian Territory, Alien Faith: Ethno-Confessional Policy of the Empire in Lithuania and Belarus under Alexander II]. Moscow, NLO, 2010. 1000 p. (In Russian)
15. Vishlenkova E.A. Vizual’noe narodovedenie imperii, ili “Uvidet’ russkogo dano ne kazhdomu” [Visual Ethnology of the Russian Empire or “Not Everyone Is Able to See the Russian”]. Moscow, NLO, 2011. 384 p. (In Russian)
16. Norris S.M. A War of Images: Russian Popular Prints, Wartime Culture, and National Identity, 1812–1945. DeKalb, North. Ill. Univ. Press, 2006. 277 p.
17. Chartier R. Intellectual history and history of mentalities: Double reassessment? Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2004, no. 2, p. 2. (In Russian)
18. Skinner Q. Motives, intentions, interpretation of texts. In: Kembridzhskaya shkola: teoriya i praktika intellektual’noi istorii [Cambridge School: Theory and Practice of Intellectual History]. Moscow, NLO, 2018, pp. 123–142. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.