'J.I. introduces very interesting concepts, but…': From the academic biography of J.I. Ioffe in the late 1930s

V.G. Ananiev

St. Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, 199034 Russia

E-mail: v.ananev@spbu.ru

Received October 2, 2019

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.1.146-157

For citation: Ananiev V.G. “J.I. introduces very interesting concepts, but…”: From the academic biography of J.I. Ioffe in the late 1930s. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gu­manitarnye Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 146–157. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.1.146-157. (In Russian)

Abstract

An episode from the academic life of Jeremiah Isaevich Ioffe, an outstanding Russian art historian and cultural theorist, related to the criticism of his book “Music of the Soviet Cinema” (1938–1939) was discussed. The archival materials of the book discussion from the Central State Archive of Literature and Art of St. Petersburg were discussed to answer the question of how J.I. Ioffe’s ideas were perceived by his contemporaries. The institutional context of the discussion is associated with one of the most interesting centers of intellectual life in Leningrad during the 1920s – the Institute of Art History (Zubov Institute), which was called the State Research Institute of Music in the middle of 1930s. It was revealed that J.I. Ioffe maintained professional relationships at the institutional level. His ideas were not rejected completely, and the criticism of the book was rebuffed by the Institute. The situation developed in a different way at the intellectual level. Colleagues showed little interest in J.I. Ioffe’s thoughts. Based on the idea of three types of scientific rationality proposed by V.S. Styopin (classical, non-classical, and post-non-classical), J.I. Ioffe’s research can be attributed to non-classical rationality and the academic mainstream of his times can be associated with classical rationality. The type of system organization of the studied object, the generalized scheme of the method of cognition and the value-target structures of the subject of activity turned out to be different for them. All these differences are clear while analyzing the discussion materials.

Keywords: J.I. Ioffe, Institute of Art History, history of cultural studies, history of science

References

1. Sychenkova L.A. “Costly mistakes” of Soviet culturology: Finishing touch to Jeremiah Isaevich Ioffe’s portrait (1888–1947). In: Ioffe J.I. Izbrannoe [Selected Works]. Moscow, RAO Govoryashchaya Kniga, 2010, pp. 901–920. (In Russian)
2. Korolev A.V. J.I. Ioffe’s synthetic art history and problems of studying socialist realism. Extended Abstract of Cand. Philos. St. Petersburg, 2006. 21 p. (In Russian)
3. Rykov A.V. The Soviet Union as “a new primitive state”. Jeremiah Ioffe’s non-orthodox Marxism. Manuskript, 2018, no. 9, pp. 151–156. (In Russian)
4. Grigor’eva N. J. Ioffe’s intermedia theory. In: Ioffe J.I. Izbrannoe: 1920–30-e gg. [Selected Works: 1920s–1930s]. St. Petersburg, Petropolis, 2006, pp. 485–518. (In Russian)
5. Nest’ev I. Quasiscientific mess: About J. Ioffe’s “Music of the Soviet Cinema”. Sovetskoe Iskusstvo, 1939, Jan. 18, no. 9 (589). (In Russian)
6. Kumpan K.A. Russian Institute of Art History in the 1920s–1930s. In: Konets institutsii kul’tury dvadtsatykh godov v Leningrade: Po arkhivnym materialam [The End of Art Institutes during the 1920s in Leningrad: Historical Data]. Moscow, Nov. Lit. Obozr., 2014, pp. 8–128. (In Russian)
7. Sychenkova L.A. The first experiments in the field of art education: A blank space in the history of the study of art. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2014, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 223–231. (In Russian)
8. Gurevich S. Leningradskoe kinovedenie. Zubovskii osobnyak. 1925–1936 [Сinematology in Leningrad. Zubov’s House. 1925–1936]. St. Petersburg. RIII, 1998. 156 p. (In Russian)
9. Ioffe J.I. Sinteticheskaya istoriya iskusstv. Vvedenie v istoriyu khudozhestvennogo myshleniya [Synthetic Art History. Introduction to the History of Artistic Thinking]. Leningrad, OGIZ Lenizogiz, 1933. 568 p. (In Russian)
10. Stepin V.S. Classicism, non-classicism, post-non-classicism: Distinguishing criteria. In: Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura [Post-Non-Classicism: Philosophy, Science, and Culture]. St. Petersburg, Mir”, 2009, pp. 249–295. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.