S.A. Lieberman
Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia
E-mail: samsonliberman@gmail.com
Received June 10, 2019
DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2019.5-6.174-182
For citation: Lieberman S.A. Reconception of history in the context of attention economy. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2019, vol. 161, no. 5–6, pp. 174–182. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2019.5-6.174-182. (In Russian)
Abstract
History functions and is defined depending on the historical context: in the modern era, it can be part of the national ideology; in Antiquity, it was perceived as a literary genre; in the Middle Ages, it was a religious worldview. In the post-capitalist era, theories about the “end of history” can also be explained as part of an ideologeme or a mythologeme. The paper aims to formulate the mechanisms of relations between the historical knowledge and the historical era. The functions of history in the contemporary world after the declared “end of history' were discussed. The concepts of attention economy and platform capitalism were considered as the basis for determining the specificity of contemporary society.
The research focuses on the forms of re-actualization of the concept of history, which we can observe now, at the end of the second decade of the 21st century. How does the concept of history function? For what purpose is it reproduced after the “end of history” and the “death of the social” proclaimed in the late 20th century? Can such re-actualization be considered a “Renaissance” of the social? These are the main questions covered by this paper.
Keywords: historicism, platform capitalism, social networks, history, subject, “end of history”
References
Srnicek N. Platform Capitalism. John Wiley & Sons, 2016. 120 p.
Hegel G.W.F. Nauka logiki [Science of Logic]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2005. 799 p. (In Russian)
Hegel G.W.F. Who thinks abstractly? Voprosy Filosofii, 1956, no. 6, pp. 138–140. (In Russian)
Fukuyama F. Identichnost': Stremlenie k priznaniyu i politika nepriyatiya [Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment]. Moscow, Alpina Publisher, 2019. 256 p. (In Russian)
Perov Yu.V., Sergeev K.A. The philosophy of Hegel's history: From substance to historicity. In: Hegel G.W.F. Lektsii po filofosii istorii [Lectures on the History of Philosophy]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1993, pp. 5–57. (In Russian)
Hegel G.W.F. Lektsii po filosofii istorii [Lectures on the Philosophy of History]. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 1993. 480 p. (In Russian)
Marx K., Engels F. Svyatoe semeistvo, ili kritika kriticheskoi kritiki. Protiv Bruno Bauera i kompanii [The Holy Family or Critique of Critical Criticism. Against Bruno Bauer and Company]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Gos. Izd. Polit. Lit., 1955, pp. 3–230. (In Russian)
Engels F. A letter to J. Bloch, September 21–22, 1890. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniya [Works]. Vol. 37. Moscow, Gos. Izd. Polit. Lit., 1965, pp. 393–397. (In Russian)
Kozhev A. Ideya smerti v filosofii Gegelya [The Idea of Death in Hegel's Philosophy]. Moscow, Logos, Progress-Traditsiya, 1998. 208 p. (In Russian)
Engels F. Ludwig Feuerbach and the outcome of 269–317. (In Russian)
Adorno Th., Horkheimer M. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Verso, 1997. 258 p. (In Russian)
Adorno Th.W. Negativnaya dialektika [Negative Dialectics]. Moscow, Akad. Proekt, 2011. 538 p. (In Russian)
Gasparyan D.E. Vvedenie v neklassicheskuyu filosofiyu [Introduction to Non-Classical Philosophy]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2011. 398 p. (In Russian)
Baudrillard J. Simulacra et Simulation
Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i poslednii chelovek [The End of History and the Last Man]. Moscow, AST, 2015. 575 p. (In Russian)
Zukerman E. Novye soedineniya. Tsifrovye kosmopolity v kommunikativnuyu epokhu [New Connection. Digital Cosmopolitans in the Communicative Era]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press, 2015. 336 p. (In Russian)
Vattimo G. The Transparent Society. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 1992. 129 p.
Lovink G. Kriticheskaya teoriya interneta [Critical Theory of the Internet]. Moscow, Ad. Marginem Press, 2019. 304 p. (In Russian)
The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.