Sociological discourse in M.M. Khvostov's works

M.V. Novikov^*, T.B. Perfilova^**

Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushinsky, Yaroslavl, 150000 Russia

E-mail: ^*m.novikov@yspu.org, ^**department_of_history@mail.ru

Received July 25, 2022

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.6.9-29

For citation: Novikov M.V., Perfilova T.B. Sociological discourse in M.M. Khvostov’s works. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2022, vol. 164, no. 6, pp. 9–29. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.6.9-29. (In Russian)

Abstract

This article analyzes the underlying aspects of the artistic heritage of M.M. Khvostov, an eminent professor at Imperial Kazan University. The focus is on the justification of the need for creating sociological history as a new type of explanatory history. The scholar’s coherent and consistent concept of sociological history was never introduced to the public, but its basics were laid and described in his publications and lecture courses. In this concept, history was qualified as an individualizing and idiographic study and sociology as a generalizing and nomothetic one. As a result of having stemmed from the belief in the unity of scientific methodology, M.M. Khvostov placed a greater emphasis on the overlapping of the subject fields and cognitive positions of these sociological branches rather than on their opposition. In order to overcome the opposition between the typological and concrete individual ways of comprehending historical reality, he proposed their theoretical and methodological synthesis on the principle of complementarity of tasks, research approaches, and methods. Therefore, the process of cognition was thought to involve studying unique facts, using the comparative historical method, as well as identifying common, similar, and typical features. The results obtained here are important for developing the theoretical and methodological foundations of historical science: M.M. Khvostov insisted that sociological history was destined to fill the existing abstract sociological schemes with reliable historical information, to contribute to the conceptualization of critically cited facts related to the multifaceted process of historical transformations of society.

Keywords: positivism, neo-Kantianism, nomothetic and ideographic sciences, generalizing and individualizing methods, history, sociology, sociological history, factor approach, historical determinism, theoretical and methodological synthesis

References

1. Matveeva I.N. On the problem of the general concept of Hellenism in M.M. Khvostov’s works through the lens of the studies in Hellenistic history at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries. . Voprosy istoriografii vseobshhei istorii [Problems of the Historiography of World History]. Kazan, Izd. Kazan. Univ., 1969, no. 4. pp. 123–130. (In Russian)
2. Matveeva I.N. On the problem of M.M. Khvostov’s research and pedagogical work. Voprosy istoriografii vseobshhei istorii [Problems of the Historiography of World History]. Kazan, Izd. Kazan. Univ., 1968, no. 3, pp. 145–153. (In Russian)
3. Putnyn’ E.K. Studying the history of ancient Greece. In: Nechkina M.V. (Ed.) Ocherki istorii istoricheskoi nauki v SSSR [Essays on the History of Historical Science in the USSR]. Vol. 3. Moscow, Izd, Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1963, pp. 374–396. (In Russian)
4. Bessmertnyi Yu.L., Khvostova K.V. M.M. Khvostov and his views on the history of the Western European peasantry (based on the materials of an unpublished course of lectures). In: Nechkina M.V. (Ed.) Istoriya i istoriki. Istoriograficheskii ezhegodnik [History and Historians: A Historiographical Yearbook]. Moscow, Nauka, 1980, pp. 322–345. (In Russian)
5. Khmylev L.N. Problemy metodologii istorii v russkoi burzhuaznoi istoriografii kontsa XIX – nachala XX v. [Problems of the Methodology of History in Russian Bourgeois Historiography of the Late 19th–Early 20th Centuries]. Tomsk, Izd. TGU, 1978, 172 p. (In Russian)
6. Shofman A.S. Mikhail Mikhailovich Khvostov [Mikhail Mikhailovich Khvostov]. Kazan, Izd. Kazan. Univ., 1979, 112 p. (In Russian)
7. Nechukhrin A.N. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy rossiiskoi pozitivistskoi istoriografii (80-e gg. XIX v. – 1917 g.) [Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Russian Positivist Historiography (1880s–1917)]. Grodno, GrGU, 2003. 349 p. (In Russian)
8. Ramazanov S.P. Krizis v rossiiskoi istoriografii nachala XX veka [Crisis in Russian Historiography during the Early 20th Century]. Pt. 1. Defining and trying to solve the problem. Volgograd, Izd. Volgogr. Gos. Univ., 1999. 144 p. (In Russian)
9. Novikov M.V., Perfilova T.B. “It was a man of labor”: In memory of M.M. Khvostov. Voprosy Istorii, 2020, no. 10, pp. 166–173. doi: 10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202010Statyi84. (In Russian)
10. Novikov M.V., Perfilova T.B. Formation of M.M. Khvostov’s scientific worldview. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 8. Istoriya, 2020, no. 4, pp. 56–74. (In Russian)
11. Novikov M.V., Perfilova T.B. The concepts of “society” and “evolution” in the interpretation of M.M. Khvostov. Vestnik Gumanitarnogo Obrazovaniya, 2021, no. 1, pp. 7–16. doi: 10.25730/VSU.2070.21.001. (In Russian)
12. Golosenko I.A. The theoretical and methodological background of non-Marxist sociology in Russia. In: Chagin E.A. (Ed.) Sociologicheskaya mysl’ v Rossii: Ocherki istorii nemarksistskoi sotsiologii poslednei treti XIX – nachala XX veka [Sociological Thought in Russia: Essays on the History of Non-Marxist Sociology in the Last Third of the 19th–Early 20th Centuries]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1978, pp. 7–49. (In Russian)
13. Medushevskaya O.M. Historical methodology as a strict science. In: Lappo-Danilevskii A.S. Metodologiya istorii [The Methodology of History]. Vol. 1. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2010, pp. 23–84. (In Russian)
14. Safronov B.G. Istoricheskoe mirovozzrenie R.Yu. Vippera i ego vremya [The Historical Worldview of R.Yu. Wipper and His Time]. Moscow, Izd. Mosk. Univ., 1976. 221 p. (In Russian)
15. Boronoev A.O. M.M. Kovalevsky, the first Russian sociologist. In: Kovalevsky M.M. Sochineniya [Writings]. Vol. 1: Sociology. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, 1997, pp. 5–17. (In Russian)
16. Gutnova E.V. Istoriografiya istorii Srednikh vekov [Historiography of the History of the Middle Ages]. Moscow, Vyssh. Shk., 1985. 479 p. (In Russian)
17. Savelyeva I.M., Poletaev A.V. Istoriya i vremya. V poiskakh utrachennogo [History and Time. In Search of the Lost]. Moscow, Yazyki Russ. Kul’t., 1997. 800 p. (In Russian)
18. Chubar’yan A.O. (Ed.) Teoriya i metodologiya istoricheskoi nauki. Terminologicheskii slovar’ [Theory and Methodology of Historical Science. Terminological Dictionary]. Moscow, Akvilon, 2014. 576 p. (In Russian)
19. Kon I.S. Pozitivizm v sotsiologii. Istoricheskii ocherk [Positivism in Sociology. A Historical Essay]. Leningrad, Izd. Leningr. Univ., 1964. 207 p. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.