The history of the Roman Republic according to the axiological approach: On the problem of the mos maiorum essence

A.O. Kudratov

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia

E-mail: alik.kudratov@gmail.com

Received February 25, 2022

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.3.112-121

For citation: Kudratov A.O. The history of the Roman Republic according to the axiological approach: On the problem of the mos maiorum essence. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2022, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 112–121. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.3.112-121. (In Russian) 

Abstract

This article analyzes one way to make a theoretical sense of the essence of the Roman civic ethics, a constant element of the political struggle in the Roman Republic. Notably, the axiological approach, which is an important methodological tool due to the specifics of the Roman political practice, has not been used in historiography to its fullest potential due to lack of conceptualization. This is reflected in historiographical studies: most researchers unanimously emphasize the essential role of the Roman virtues (virtutes) in the Roman political culture. The analysis of the historiographical works showed that philological methods are traditionally used to study the Roman virtues, which serve as a key to answering numerous questions related to the ideas of the Romans. The results obtained revealed that these tools are not sufficient themselves due to the discrepancy between the Roman reality and political rhetoric, in the context of which the virtues are identified. Differences were found between Russian and foreign historiography in the approaches to the analysis of the concepts related to the one under consideration here. The vast potential of using the axiological approach to study the Roman history was outlined. Earlier attempts to get the most of it were critically assessed. To advance the achievements that have been made, the concept of value was clarified and defined in terms of the Roman political context.

Keywords: Roman Republic, axiological approach, Roman civic ethics, virtus, mos maiorum

References

1. Axiological approach in historical research. In: Chubar’yan A.O. (Ed.) Teoriya i metodologiya istoricheskoi nauki. Terminologicheskii slovar’ [Theory and Methodology of Historical Science: Terminological Dictionary]. Moscow, Akvilon, 2014, pp. 528–530. (In Russian)
2. Makhlayuk A.V. Ancestors’ spirits, virtue, and discipline: Socio-cultural and ideological aspects of ancient military history in modern historiography. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 2010, no. 3, pp. 141–161. (In Russian)
3. Alston R. Rome’s Revolution: Death of the Republic and Birth of the Empire. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 2015. xx, 385 p.
4. Edwards C. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993. 229 p.
5. Mattingly H. The Roman “virtues”. Harvard Theological Review, 1937, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 103–117. doi: 10.1017/S0017816000022173.
6. Connolly J. The State of Speech. Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton, Princeton Univ. Press, 2007. 304 p.
7. Wiseman T.P. The two-headed state: How Romans explained civil war. In: Breed B.W., Damon C., Rossi A. (Eds.) Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 2010, pp. 25–45.
8. Syme R. The Roman Revolution. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 2002. 592 p.
9. Dement’eva V.V. Roman identity: Development of traditions typical of a civil community. In: Antichnyi mir i arkheologiya [Ancient World and Archeology]. Saratov, Nauchn. Kn., 2009, no. 13, pp. 203–213. (In Russian)
10. Egorov A.B. Ancient democracy and the Roman political system (ancient and modern political theory). Mnemon: Issledovaniya i Publikatsii po Istorii Antichnogo Mira, 2013, no. 13, pp. 207–226. (In Russian)
11. Knabe G.S. Kornelii Tatsit. Vremya. Zhizn’. Knigi [Cornelius Tacitus. Time. Life. Books]. Мoscow, Nauka, 1981. 208 p. (In Russian)
12. Nemirovskii A.I. Ideologiya i kul’tura rannego Rima [Ideology and Culture of Early Rome]. Voronezh, Izd. Voronezh. Univ., 1964. 208 p. (In Russian)
13. Shtaerman E.M. From a citizen to a subject. In: Shtaerman E.M. Kul’tura drevnego Rima [The Culture of Ancient Rome]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Nauka, 1985, pp. 22–106. (In Russian)
14. Chekanova N.V. Rimskaya diktatura poslednego veka Respubliki [The Roman Dictatorship during the Last Century of the Republic]. St. Petersburg, Gumanit. Akad., 2005. 480 p. (In Russian)
15. Utchenko S.L. Two scales in the Roman system of values. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 1972, no. 4, pp. 19–34. (In Russian)
16. Utchenko S.L. Once again about the Roman system of values. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 1973, no. 4, pp. 30–48. (In Russian)
17. Makhlayuk A.V. Ideas and approaches of historical anthropology to studying the Roman Army. In: Smirnova O.P., Smyshlyaev A.L. (Eds.) Drevnee Sredizemnomor’e: religiya, obshchestvo, kul’tura [The Ancient Mediterranean: Religion, Society, and Culture]. Moscow, IVI Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2005, pp. 83–113. (In Russian)
18. Powell J. G.F. Cicero’s De re publica and the virtues of the statesman. In: Nicgorski W. (Ed.) Cicero’s Practical Philosophy. Notre Dame, Univ. of Notre Dame Press, 2012, pp. 14–42.
19. Weinstock S. Divus Julius. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1971. 414 p.
20. Toher M. Augustan and Tiberian literature. In: Griffin M. A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, pp. 224–239. doi: 10.1002/9781444308440.ch16.
21. Lubimova О.V. The term populares in modern historiography. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 2015, no. 1, pp. 190–207. (In Russian)
22. Utchenko S.L. Krisis i padenie Rimskoi Respubliki [The Crisis and Fall of the Roman Republic]. Moscow, Nauka, 1965. 288 p. (In Rusian)
23. Shokhin V.К. Filosofiya tsennostei i rannyaya aksiologicheskaya mysl’ [Philosophy of Values and Early Axiological Thought]. Мoscow, Izd. RUDN, 2006. 457 p. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.