The engaging leisure activities of an industrial town in the early 1950s

E.M. Buryak^*, N.N. Makarova^**, N.V. Chernova^***

Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, 455000 Russia

E-mail: ^*lench81@inbox.ru, ^**makarovanadia@mail.ru, ^***nina_chernova@mail.ru

Received February 3, 2022

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.3.213-227

For citation: Buryak E.M., Makarova N.N., Chernova N.V. The engaging leisure activities of an industrial town in the early 1950s. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2022, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 213–227. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.3.213-227. (In Russian) 

Abstract

This article considers the main leisure activities of Magnitogorsk residents in the early 1950s based on their personal memories, local materials of the clerical sources, and periodicals. The analysis shows how the residents spent their free time and what emotions they had. On the one hand, the leisure options of that time (for example, going to cinemas, theaters, parks, circuses, libraries, concerts, sports sections, hobby clubs, public lectures, public readings of books, educational meetings arranged by the party, as well as organizing holidays and public events, amateur art shows, mass leisure out of town, resort holidays, etc.) were largely defined by the political regime and ideology. On the other hand, the urban community either tacitly rejected or changed those activities that turned out to be unpopular or boring. At the same time, one of the main trends supported by the Magnitogorsk residents was collectivism and publicity while engaging in a leisure activity. The latter two formed an integral part of the Soviet consciousness. Particular attention is paid to the problems faced by the city in the organization of leisure and recreational activities: the construction of cultural and entertainment venues failed to keep up with the growth of the city population; some residents were not properly educated about the value and importance of certain leisure types. The workers were tired because of their hard working shifts at the metallurgical plant and everyday life, thus many of them showed no interest in outdoor activities. It is concluded that the organization of leisure time in Magnitogorsk, which was a role model for the entire Soviet society, was essential in upholding the morale of its residents.

Keywords: leisure, new city, emotional state, Urals, Magnitogorsk

Acknowledgements. The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 21-09-43032).

References

1. Kostyurina N.Yu. A model of the culture of the new Soviet city in the 1930s–1950s. Omskii Nauchnyi Vestnik, 2005, no. 3, pp. 28–33. (In Russian)
2. Zubkova E.Yu. Poslevoennoe sovetskoe obshchestvo: politika i povsednevnost’. 1945–1953. [The PostWar Soviet Society: Politics and Everyday Life. 1945–1953]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 1999. 229 p. (In Russian)
3. Lejbovic O.L. V gorode M. Ocherki sotsial’noi povsednevnosti sovetskoi provintsii v 40–50-kh gg. [In the City of M. Essays on the Social Everyday Life of Soviet Industry in the 1940s and 1950s]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2008. 295 p. (In Russian)
4. Lebina N.B. Povsednevnaya zhizn’ sovetskogo goroda: Normy i anomalii, 1920–1930-e gody [Everyday Life in the Soviet City: Norms and Abnormalities, 1920s–1930s]. St. Petersburg, Zh. “Neva”, Letnii Sad, 1999. 320 p. (In Russian)
5. Bakanov V.P. Ispytanie Magnitkoi [Trying Out Magnitka]. Magnitogorsk, MiniTip, 2001. 336 p. (In Russian)
6. Galiguzov I.F., Bakanov V.P. Stanitsa Magnitnaya. Ot kazach’ei stanitsy do goroda metallurgov [The Village of Magnitnaya. From the Cossack Village to the Metallurgical City]. Magnitogorsk, Magnitogorsk. Poligraf. Predpriyatie, 1994. 398 p. (In Russian)
7. Akhmetzyanov S.Kh. Stalinskii period v istorii Magnitogorska [The Stalinist Period in the Magnitogorsk History]. Magnitogorsk, Magnitogorsk. Dom Pechati, 2019. 104 p. (In Russian)
8. Makarov A.N. Outreach support for the industrialization of 1929–1941 by means of Soviet photojournalism (using Magnitogorsk as an example). Extended Abstract of Cand. Hist. Diss. Chelyabinsk, 2013. 31 p. (In Russian)
9. Makarova N.N. “V kotle industrializatsii”: povsednevnaya zhizn’ Magnitogorska (1929–1941) [“In the Cauldron of Industrialization”: The Everyday Life of Magnitogorsk (1929–1941)]. Magnitogorsk, Dom Pechati, 2014. 428 p. (In Russian)
10. Starodubova O.Yu. Material conditions of the cultural sphere during the Great Patriotic War (as in the case of the Magnitogorsk Pushkin Theater). In: Nauchnaya mysl’: traditsii i innovatsii [Scientific Thought: Traditions and Innovations]. Krasnodar, Individ. Predprinimatel’ Akelyan Narine Samadovna, 2015, pp. 274–277. (In Russian)
11. Chernova N.V. The organization and work of cooperative artels in the city under construction (as exemplified by the Magnitogorsk “Uralshvei” artel). In: Mobilizatsionnaya model’ ekonomiki: istoricheskii opyt Rossii XX veka [A Mobilization Model of Economy: The Historical Experience of Russia in the 20th Century]. Chelyabinsk, Entsiklopediya, 2009, pp. 470–476. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.