Assuming the role of an orientalist: Alexander Mishulin's articles about the history of the Ancient East

S.B. Krikh

Dostoevsky Omsk State University, Omsk, 644077 Russia

E-mail: krikh@rambler.ru

Received April 5, 2021

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.3.41-54

For citation: Krikh S.B. Assuming the role of an orientalist: Alexander Mishulin’s articles about the history of the Ancient East. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2021, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 41–54. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.3.41-54. (In Russian)

Abstract

The popular articles written by A.V. Mishulin (1901–1948), a Soviet historian of antiquity, were analyzed. These articles are focused on the history and culture of the Ancient East states (Egypt, India, and China) with account of their impact on the establishment of Soviet historical science. Their role in A.V. Mishulin’s research activity is very important, because they were used in his school textbook of ancient history. A.V. Mishulin consistently adhered to the idea that slavery was a common basis of all ancient states, but he also believed that the slave-owning systems in the Ancient East and Greco-Roman world were different. Through a brief description of the Ancient East states, he emphasized the following two main aspects: all ancient societies exploited slaves, which inevitably resulted in the mass uprisings as a consequence of exhaustion of the slave-owning mode of production. To prove the validity of his ideas, A.V. Mishulin used historical material (such as the Papyrus Leiden). Therefore, the history of the Ancient East and Greco-Roman world more or less correlated with each other in A.V. Mishulin’s school textbook, which influenced the subsequent organization of school textbooks of history in the Soviet Union.

Keywords: Soviet historiography, history of orientalism, development of Soviet views on history, teaching history in schools

Acknowledgments. The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 20-09-41014).

References

1. Krikh S.B. A.V. Mishulin and his Spartacus. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 2015, no. 1, pp. 178–189. (In Russian)
2. Karpyuk S.G. Politics and science: Editorials in the first decade of Vestnik Drevnei Istorii (Journal of Ancient History) (1937–1947). Scripta Antiqua. Voprosy Drevnei Istorii, Filologii, Iskusstva i Material’noi Kul’tury, 2021, vol. 9, pp. 377–390. (In Russian)
3. Malyugin O.V. From the Bolshevists Ilovaysky to the textbook without authors: The history of creating of an ancient history textbook for schools in the 1930s. Scripta Antiqua. Voprosy Drevnei Istorii, Filologii, Iskusstva i Material’noi Kul’tury, 2017, vol. 6, pp. 406–420. (In Russian)
4. Krikh S.B. History with literature: The forgotten case of creating the first Soviet textbook in ancient history for schools. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2019, vol. 161, no. 2–3, pp. 161–169. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2019.2-3.161-169. (In Russian)
5. Krikh S.B. A textbook and its author: The pre-revolutionary Russian tradition and Soviet innovations in Nikolay M. Nikolsky’s work. Quaestio Rossica, 2019, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1299–1308. doi: 10.15826/qr.2019.4.439.
6. Krikh S.B. Ancient history and new publicism: About searching for a narrative in the Soviet historiography of the Stalin time. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Istoriya, 2021, no. 1, pp. 94–103. doi: 10.17072/2219-3111-2021-1-94-103. (In Russian)
7. Skvortsov A.M. On the history of Soviet historical science development in the 1930s–1940s: Doctoral dissertation defense by A.V. Mishulin. Nauchnyi Dialog, 2019, no. 2, pp. 296–310. doi: 10.24224/2227-1295-2019-2-296-310. (In Russian)
8. Berlev O.D., Dandamaev M.A., Fikhman I.F. On the 100th birth anniversary of Academician Vasily Vasilievich Struve. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 1989, no. 1, pp. 244–249. (In Russian)
9. Krikh S.B. Assyriology and Stalinism: Soviet historiography and the invention of slavery in the ancient Near East. Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History, 2016, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 191–209. doi: 10.1515/janeh-2017-0002.
10. Georgievskii S. Pervyi period kitaiskoi istorii (do imperatora Tsin’-shi-khuan-di) [The Earliest Period of Chinese History (Before the Emperor Qin Shi Huang)]. St. Petersburg, Pechatnya A. Grigor’eva, 1885. 322 p. (In Russian)
11. Ancient Records of Egypt. Historical Documents from the Earliest Times to the Persian Conquest. Breasted J.H. (Ed.). Vol. 4: The twentieth to the twenty-sixth dynasties. Chicago, The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1906. 520 p.
12. Il’in-Tomich A.A. “Social revolution” in Egypt according to Vasily Struve’s works. Vestnik Universiteta Dmitriya Pozharskogo, 2016, no. 2, pp. 35–46. (In Russian)
13. Matje M.E. Chto chitali egiptyane 4000 let tomu nazad [What the Egyptians Read 4000 Years Ago]. Leningrad, Gos. Ermitazh, 1934. 80 p. (In Russian)
14. Struve V.V. Istoriya drevnego Vostoka: Kratkii kurs [History of the Ancient East: A Short Course]. Moscow, Gos. Sots.-Ek. Izd., 1934. 130 p. (In Russian)
15. Gardiner A.H. The Admonitions of an Egyptian Sage from a Hieratic Papyrus in Leiden (Pap. Leiden 344 Recto). Leipzig, J.C. Hinrichs’sche Buchh., 1909. 116 p. + 18 plt.
16. Sergeev V. Istoriya drevnei Gretsii [History of Ancient Greece]. Moscow, Gos. Sots.-Ek. Izd., 1939. 400 p. (In Russian)
17. Struve V.V. Marx’s definition of early class society. In: Sovetskaya etnografiya [Soviet Ethnography]. Moscow, Leningrad, 1940, no. 3, pp. 5–22. (In Russian)
18. Krikh S.B. V.V. Struve’s theoretical substantiation of the concept of slave societies in the Ancient East. Sotsial’nye instituty v istorii: retrospektsiya i real’nost’: Materialy XII mezhvuz. Region. nauch. konf. [Social Institutions in History: Retrospection and Reality: Proc. XII Interuniv. Reg. Sci. Conf.]. Omsk, Izd. OmGU, 2012, pp. 153–170. (In Russian)
19. Rechenie Ipuvera. Leidenskii papirus N. 344. Sotsial’nyi perevorot v Egipte v kontse Srednego tsarstva (ok. 1750 g. do n.e.) [Admonitions of Ipuwer. Papyrus Leiden 344 Recto. Social Upheaval in Egypt at the Еnd of the Middle Kingdom (c. 1750 B.C.)]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gos. Sots.-Ek. Izd., 1935. 56 p. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.