Substantive suffixal adjectives with the semantics of intensity in the Russian language: A systemic functional approach

Fangfang Liu^*, V.A. Kosova^**

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia

E-mail: ^*dafangkazan@gmail.com, ^**vera_kosova@mail.ru

Received June 17, 2020

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.5.33-47

For citation: Liu F., Kosova V.A. Substantive suffixal adjectives with the semantics of intensity in the Russian language: A systemic functional approach. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 33–47. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.5.33-47. (In Russian)

Abstract

Comparative analysis of substantive adjectives with the suffixes -at-, -ast-, -ist-, all having a common additional component of intensity in their derivational semantics, was performed. The adjectives were considered within a series of derivational means used to express the semantic category of intensity. The study is relevant due to the necessity to create a fundamentally new and cognitively oriented description of word-formation units of the Russian language from the standpoint of the systemic functional approach. The purpose of the study was to establish the systemic and categorical status of substantive suffixal adjectives with the semantics of intensity, as well as their functional correlations. Conclusions were made about the subcategorizing character of this meaning in the field of mutational semantics of Russian adjectives (the systemic status of its carriers is a derivational subtype with the suffix -ast- and word-formation subtypes with the suffixes -at-, -ist-). Functional features of the derivatives with each suffix were defined. Similarities and differences between them were revealed. Their systemic and functional relationship (synonymy and parallelism) was established. Zones of functional dominance were found.

Keywords: adjective, derivational semantics, suffix, derivational type, semantic category, category of intensity

Figure Captions

Fig. 1. The number of adjectives with the suffixes -at-, -ist- characterized by the same derivational type, as evidenced by the Russian National Corpus.

Fig. 2. The number of adjectives with the suffixes -ast-, -ist- characterized by the same derivational type, as evidenced by the Russian National Corpus.

References

1. Zemskaya E.A. Yazyk kak deyatel’nost’ [Language as an Activity]. Moscow, FLINTA, 2015. 896 p. (In Russian)
2. Kosova V.A. The ideas of the founders of the Kazan Linguistic School as a background of the theory of word-formation categoricality. Vestnik MGOU, 2013, no. 4. Available at: http://evestnik-mgou.ru/Articles/View/465. (In Russian)
3. Vinogradov V.V. Russkii yazyk (Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove) [Russian Language (Grammatical Study about the Word)]. Zolotova G.A. (Ed.). Moscow, Rus. Yaz., 2001. 720 p. (In Russian)
4. Revenko I.V. The linguistic category of intensity and its explication in V. Astafiev’s individual style. Cand. Philol. Diss. Kemerovo, 2004. 265 p. (In Russian)
5. Mitev D. Word formation in the aspect of linguistic nomination. In: Problemy kognitivnogo i funktsional’nogo opisaniya russkogo i bolgarskogo yazykov [Problems of Cognitive and Functional Description of the Russian and Bulgarian Languages]. Shumen, 2002. Available at: https://www.shu.bg/wp-content/uploads/file-manager-advanced/users/faculties/fhn/izdaniya/prb/ problemi-01.pdf. (In Russian)
6. Pavskii G.P. Filologicheskie nablyudeniya nad sostavom russkogo yazyka [Philological Observations on the Composition of the Russian Language]. St. Petersburg, Tip. Imp. Akad. Nauk, 1850. 335 p. (In Russian)
7. Buslaev F.I. Opyt istoricheskoi grammatiki russkogo yazyka [An Essay on the Historical Grammar of the Russian Language]. Moscow, Univ. Tip., 1858. (In Russian)
8. Bogoroditskii V.A. Obshchii kurs russkoi grammatiki [A General Course of Russian Grammar]. Moscow, Leningrad, Sotsekgiz, 1935. 356 p. (In Russian)
9. Balalykina E.A. Russkoe ad”ektivnoe slovoobrazovanie na balto-slavyanskom fone [Russian Adjectival Word Formation on the Balto-Slavic Background]. Kazan, Izd. Kazan. Univ., 2007. 272 p. (In Russian)
10. Russkaya grammatika [Russian Grammar]. Vol. 1: Phonetics. Phonology. Stress. Intonation. Word formation. Morphology. Moscow, Nauka, 1980. 783 p. (In Russian)
11. Liu F. Features of derivational semantics of substantive adjectives with the suffix -at-. In: Materialy Mezhdunar. molodezhnogo nauch. foruma “LOMONOSOV-2020” [Proc. Int. Sci. Forum for Young Researchers “LOMONOSOV-2020”]. Moscow, MAKS Press, 2020. Available at: https://lomonosov-msu.ru/archive/Lomonosov_2020/index.htm. (In Russian)
12. Bondarko A.V. Analysis of verbal categories in the functional grammar system. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta Lingvisticheskikh Issledovanii, 2015, no. 1, pp. 25–40. (In Russian)
13. Mitev D. Towards the development of a model of comparative characteristics of the word-formation systems of the Bulgarian and Russian languages. In: Aspekty kontrastivnogo opisaniya russkogo i bolgarskogo yazykov [Aspects of a Contrastive Description of the Bulgarian and Russian Languages]. Shumen, Univ. Izd. “Episkop Konstantin Preslavski”, 2006, pp. 94–139. (In Russian)
14. Dinamika semantiko-slovoobrazovatel’nykh podsistem russkogo yazyka [Dynamics of Semantic and Derivational Subsystems of the Russian Language]. Saratov, Nauchn. Kniga, 2010. 370 p. (In Russian)
15. Zemskaya E.A., Kitaigorodskaya M.V., Shiryaev E.N. Russkaya razgovornaya rech’: Obshchie voprosy. Slovoobrazovanie. Sintaksis [Russian Colloquial Speech: General Questions. Word Formation. Syntax]. Moscow, Nauka, 1981. 276 p. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.