The Zemstvo as a challenge: Paradoxes of governmental discourse in 1894–1904

D.A. Andreev

Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991 Russia

E-mail: carpenter2005@yandex.ru

Received April 6, 2020

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.3.120-131

For citation: Andreev D.A. The Zemstvo as a challenge: Paradoxes of governmental discourse in 1894–1904. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 120–131. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.3.120-131. (In Russian)

Abstract

The paper analyzes the paradoxical coexistence of two understandings of the Zemstvo in the Russian governmental discourse during 1894–1904: it was perceived, on the one hand, as a legitimate local self-government that should be developed and implemented in the regions lacking it and, on the other hand, as an environment viable for implanting the idea of the inevitability of a constitutionalist perspective in the society and the state. The interconnection of both these interpretations with the political situation and the struggle of key ministers and their groups was discussed. The work is of particular interest and relevance, because it demonstrates how the transformation of the perception of the Zemstvo evolved in governmental circles throughout this period, how it was used by the highest bureaucracy, and how it influenced the image of the Zemstvo in the society. The research is based on documents, which were either reinterpreted or for the first time introduced into the scholarly discourse. The results enable adjustments to be made to the historiographic assessment of Russia’s domestic political development from the accession to the throne of Nicholas II until the large-scale political crisis of 1905–1906, which eventually culminated in a fundamental reform of the state system.

Keywords: Emperor Nicholas II, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Finance, Zemstvo, I.L. Goremykin, D.S. Sipyagin, V.K. Plehve, S.Yu. Witte

References

1. Andreev D.A. How “absurd” reveries became “meaningless”: On Emperor Nicholas II’s appeal on 17th January, 1895. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 2011, no. 2, pp. 36–44. (In Russian)
2. Andreev D.A. P.D. Akhlestyshev’s “case” and the battle at the top of government at the beginning of the reign of Nicholas II. Rossiyskaya Istoriya, 2020, no. 1, pp. 37–50. doi: 10.31857/S086956870008484-3. (In Russian)
3. Andreev D.A. Tver Governor P.D. Akhlestyshev and Minister of the Interior I.L. Goremykin: Confrontation over the Zemstvo in 1896–1897. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 8: Istoriya, 2019, no. 6, pp. 60–75. (In Russian)
4. Anan’ich B.V., Ganelin R.Sh., Dubentsov B.B. Krizis samoderzhaviya v Rossii, 1895–1917 [Crisis of Autocracy in Russia, 1895–1917]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1984. 664 p. (In Russian)
5. Solovyov K.A. Politicheskaya sistema Rossiiskoj imperii v 1881–1905 gg.: problema zakonotvorchestva [The Political System of the Russian Empire in 1881–1905: The Problem of Lawmaking]. Moscow, Polit. Entsikl., 2018. 351 p. (In Russian)
6. Lukoyanov I.V. Projects on changes in the political system of Russia in the late 19th–early 20th centuries and authority (right-wing reformism). Cand. Hist. Diss. St. Petersburg, 1993. 375 p. (In Russian)
7. Andreev D.A. Student riots and struggles at the top of government in the winter and spring of 1899. Rossiyskaya Istoriya, 2012, no. 1, pp. 59–68. (In Russian)
8. Andreev D.A. Dmitrii Sergeevich Sipyagin. Voprosy Istorii, 2020, no. 1, pp. 35–53. doi: 10.31166/VoprosyIstorii202001Statyi21. (In Russian)
9. Solov’ev K.A. V.K. Plehve: Failed reformer. In: Problemy reformirovaniya Rossii na rubezhe XIX–XX vv.: k stoletiyu so dnya smerti S.Yu. Vitte [Issues of Reforming Russia at the Turn of the 19th Century: In Commemoration of the Centenary of the Death of S.Yu. Witte]. St. Petersburg, Izd. Evr. Univ. S.-Peterb., 2018, pp. 149–164. (In Russian)
10. Minakov A.S. V.K. Plehve and the nobility at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries: Debates on reforms. In: Mnogogrannyi talant istorika: Pamyati doktora istoricheskikh nauk professora Avenira Pavlovicha Korelina [Versatile Talent of Historian: In Memory of Professor Avenir Pavlovich Korelin, Doctor of History]. Moscow, Inst. Ross. Ist. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2019, pp. 215–236. (In Russian)
11. Shatsillo K.F. Russkii liberalizm nakanune revolyutsii 1905–1907 gg.: Organizatsiya. Programmy. Taktika [Russian Liberalism on the Eve of the Revolution of 1905–1907. Organization. Programs. Tactics]. Moscow, Nauka, 1985. 347 p. (In Russian)
12. Solovyov K.A. Kruzhok “Beseda”: v poiskakh novoi politicheskoi real’nosti, 1899–1905 [Beseda Circle: In Search of a New Political Reality, 1899–1905]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2009. 287 p. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.