Greco-Persian wars: View from Persia
Institutes and Faculties
Main page \ Research and Innovations \ Publications \ Publishing activities of KFU \ Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta \ Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki \ Archive

Greco-Persian wars: View from Persia

E.V. Rung*, E.A. Venidiktova**

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia

E-mail: *Eduard_Rung@mail.ru, **e_venidiktova@mail.ru,

Received April 14, 2017

Full text PDF

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine some of the evidences, both Old-Persian and Greek ones, which can reflect Persian views on the Greco-Persian wars. The paper is based on the comparative analysis of the Persian epigraphic material and Greek literary sources that enabled us to make an attempt of reconstruction of the Persian version of the events. The novelty is that this paper argues against the opinion expressed by some scholars about the possibility of reconstruction of the Persian version at all. The ins­cription of Darius I on the Naqsh-e Rustam tomb reflects the expansion of the Persian Empire as a result of military actions (DNa. 39-47), and the mention of the Greeks (Yaunā) in various old-Persian texts attests the military expansion of Darius I and Xerxes into Europe. The Greek authors (Aeschylus, Herodotus, Dio Chrysostom) also provide us with some evidence of the Persian perception of the Greco-Persian wars, but the question arises with regard to their interpretation: are their testimonies true reflections of the Persian version of the events or just its imitation, the “construct” of authors themselves? The following conclusions can be made as a result of the research: the view from Persia definitely takes place, but the data in our sources are devoid of any details; some Greek authors have a conscious or unconscious desire to take into account all points of view on the course and results of the conflict.

Keywords: Greco-Persian wars, Achaemenids, Darius, Xerxes, Old-Persian ins­criptions, Aeschylus, Herodotus, Dio Chrysostom

References

  1. Rung E.V., Chiglintsev E.A. Darius versus Xerxem: The images of Darius I and Xerxes in Old-Persian texts and in the works of Aeschylus and Herodotus. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 2017, no. 3, pp. 696–719. (In Russian)
  2. Rung E.V. The Greco-Persian wars in the Greek poetic tradition: From Simonides of Ceos to Aeschylus, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya Istoriya, 2007, no. 4, pp. 149–158. (In Russian)
  3. Graves R.R. Mify drevnei Gretsii [The Greek Myths]. Moscow, Azbuka-Attikus, 2016. 832 p. (In Russian)
  4. Gibson A.G.G. Robert Graves and the Classical Tradition. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 2015. 370 p.
  5. Graves R. Persidskaya versiya [The Persian Version]. Available at: http://raf-sh.livejournal.com/ 706921.html. (In Russian)
  6. Olmstead A.T. Persia and the Greek frontier problem. Classical Philology, 1939, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 305–322.
  7. Lewis D.M. The Phoenician fleet in 411 B.C. Historia, 1958, Bd. 7, Ht. 3, S. 392–397.
  8. Lewis D.M. Sparta and Persia: Lectures Delivered at the University of Cincinnati, Autumn 1976 in Memory of Donald W. Bradeen. Leiden, Brill, 1977. 177 p.
  9. Cartledge P. Agesilaos and the Crisis of Sparta. London, Duckworth, 1987. 508 p.
  10. Keen A.G. Persian policy in the Aegean, 412–386 B.C. Journal of Ancient Civilizations, 1998, vol. 13, pp. 93–110.
  11. Cawkwell G.L. The Greek Wars. The Failure of Persia. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 2005. 316 p.
  12. Cuyler Young T. 480/479 B.C. – A Persian perspective. Iranica Antiqua, 1980, vol. 15, pp. 213–239.
  13. Tuplin C.J. Marathon. In search of a Persian Dimension. In: Buraselis K., Meidani K. (Eds.) Μαραθών: η μάχη και ο αρχαίος Δήμος. Athens, Inst. du Livre, A. Kardamitsa, 2010, pp. 251–274.
  14. Ruberto A. La vittoria di Serse in Grecia. Problemi, testimonianze, ipotesi. Klio, 2012, Bd. 94, Ht. 2, S. 300–311. (In Italian)
  15. Briant P. From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire. Winona Lake, Indiana,   Eisenbrauns, 2002. 1196 p.
  16. Sancisi-Weerdenburg H. Political concepts in Old-Persian royal ins­criptions. In: Rauflaub K.A. (Ed.) Anfänge politischen Denkens in der Antike: die nahöstlichen Kulturen und die Griechen [Kolloquium, München 10.-13. Juni 1990]. München, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 1993, pp. 145–163. doi: 10.1515/9783486595734-010.
  17. Rollinger R. Thinking and writing about history in Teispid and Achaemenid Persia. In: Rauflaub K.A. (Ed.) Thinking, Recording, and Writing History in the Ancient World. Oxford, J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2014, pp. 187–212.
  18. Rung E.V. The idea of empire in the state of the Achaemenids. Problemy Istorii, Filologii, Kul'tury, 2015, no. 4, pp. 130–140. (In Russian)
  19. Richter G.M.A. The Late “Achaemenian” or “Graeco-Persian” gems. Hesperia Supplements, 1949, vol. 8, pp. 291–298, 467–474.
  20. Gates J.E. The ethnicity name game: What lies behind “Graeco-Persian”? Ars Orientalis, 2002, vol. 32, pp. 105–132.
  21. Miller M.C. Imaging Persians in the age of Herodotus. In: Rollinger R., Truschnegg B., Bichler R. (Eds.) Herodot und das Persische Weltreich. Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz, 2011, S. 123–158.
  22. Lewis D.M. Datis the Mede. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 1980, vol. 100, pp. 194–195.
  23. Lewis D.M. Selected Papers in Greek and Near Eastern History. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997. 418 р. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511518560.
  24. Hallock R.T. Selected fortification texts. Cahiers de la Délégation Archéologique Française en Iran, 1978, vol. 8, pp. 109–136.
  25. Hallock R.T. Persepolis Fortification Tablets. Chicago, Univ. Chicago Press, 1969. 776 p.
  26. Kuzishchin V.I. Istoriya drevnego Vostoka: teksty i dokumenty [Ancient East History: Texts and Documents]. Moscow, Vyssh. Shk., 2002. 719 p. (In Russian)
  27. Tolman H.C. Does yaunā takabarā (Dar. NSa) signify' shield (i.e. petasos)-wearing Ionians'? Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 1913, vol. 44, pp. LIII–LV.
  28. Büchner V.F. Yaunā takabarā. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung, 1920, Ht. 3/4, S. 58–60.
  29. Calmeyer P. Zur Rechtfertigung einiger großköniglicher Inschriften und Darstellungen: Die Yauna. In: Koch H., MacKenzie D.N. (Hrsg.) Kunst, Kultur und Geschichte der Achämenidenzeit und ihr Fortleben. Berlin, D. Reimer, 1983, S. 153–169. (In German)
  30. Rollinger R. Yaunā takabarā und maginnāta tragende “Ionier”. Zum Problem der “griechischen” Thronträgerfiguren in Naqsch-i Rustam und Persepolis. In: Rollinger R., Truschnegg B. (Hrsg.) Altertum und Mittelmeerraum: Die antike Welt diesseits und jenseits der Levante. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verl., 2006, S. 365–400. (In German)
  31. Sancisi-Weerdenburg H. Yaunā by the sea and across the sea. In: Malkin I. (Ed.) Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard Univ. Press, 2001, pp. 323–346.
  32. Rollinger R. The eastern Mediterranean and Beyond: The Relations between the Worlds of the 'Greek' and 'non-Greek' Civilizations. In: Kinzl K. (Ed.) A Companion to the Classical Greek World. Oxford, Blackwell Publ., 2006, pp. 197–226.
  33. Tuplin C.J. Revisiting Dareios' Scythian Expedition. In: Nieling J., Rehm E. (Eds.) The Achaemenid Impact in the Black Sea: Communication of Powers. Aarhus, Aarhus Univ. Press, 2010, pp. 281–312.
  34. Vasilev M.I. The Policy of Darius and Xerxes towards Thrace and Macedonia. Leiden, Brill, 2015. 260 p.
  35. Rollinger R. “Griechen” und “Perser” im 5. und 4. Jahrhundert v. Chr. im Blickwinkel orientalischer Quellen, oder: Das Mittelmeer als Brücke zwischen Ost und West. In: Burtscher-Bechter B., Haider P.W., Mertz-Baumgartner B., Rollinger R. (Eds.) Grenzen und Entgrenzungen: Der Mediterrane Raum. Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 2006, S. 125–153. (In German)
  36. Root M.C. The King and Kingship in Achaemenid Art: Essays on the Creation of an Iconography of Empire. Leiden, Brill, 1979. 226 p.
  37. Rung E.V. Greeks in the Achaemenid royal ins­criptions: On the problem of Yauna localization. Vostok, Evropa, Amerika v drevnosti: Sb. nauch. tr. XVII Sergeevskikh chtenii [East, Europe, and America in Ancient Times: Proc. XVII Sergeev Lectures]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Izd. Mosk. Univ., 2012, pp. 116–123. (In Russian)
  38. Aeschylus. Persae. Garvie A.F. (Ed.). Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 2009. LXII, 398 p. doi: 10/1017/S0009840X10001769.
  39. Rung E.V. Provision of land and water in the Greco-Persian relations. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 2007, no. 4, pp. 3–26. (In Russian)
  40. Rung E.V. Diplomatic expression of Persian imperialism: Persian requirements for land and water. In: Mnemon: Issledovaniya i publikatsii po istorii antichnogo mira [Mnemone: Studies and Publications on Ancient World History], 2007, no. 6, pp. 41–60. (In Russian)
  41. Rung E. The language of the Achaemenid imperial diplomacy towards the Greeks: The meaning of earth and water. Klio, 2015, Bd. 97, Ht. 2, S. 503–515.
  42. Sancisi-Weerdenburg H. The problem of the Yauna. Achaemenid Anatolia: Proc. 1st Int. Symp. on Anatolia in the Achaemenid Period, Bandirma 15–18 August 1997. Bakır T. (Ed.). Leiden, Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, 2001, pp. 1–11.
  43. Rung E.V. Tissaphernes and the Hydarnids in the context of the political history of the Achaemenidian power in the 5th century BC. Vestnik Drevnei Istorii, 2012, no. 1, pp. 16–39. (In Russian)
  44. Burstain S.M. Outpost of Hellenism: The Emergence of Heraclea on the Black Sea. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press, 1976. 153 p.
  45. Abe T. Dascylium: An overview of the Achaemenid satrapal City. Acta academiae antiquitatis Kiotoensis, 2012, vol. 12, pp. 1–17.
  46. Schmitt R. Die achaimenidische Satrapie tayaiy drayahyā. Historia, 1972, Bd. 21, Ht. 4, S. 522–527. (In German)
  47. Klinkott H. Yauna – Die Griechen aus persischer Sicht? In: Klinkott H. (Hg.) Anatolien im Lichte kultureller Weschselwirkungen. Akkulturationsphänomene in Kleinasien und seinen Nachbarregionen während des 2. und 1. Jahrtausends v. Chr. Tübingen, Attempto-Verl., 2001, S. 107–148. (In German)
  48. Rung E. Some notes on Karanos in the Achaemenid Empire. Iranica Antiqua, 2015, vol. 50, pp. 333–356.
  49. Murray D. The waters at the end of the world: Herodotus and Mesopotamian cosmic geography. In: Barker E., Bouzarovski S., Pelling C.B.R., Isaksen L. (Eds.) New Worlds from Old Texts: Revisiting Ancient Space and Place. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 2016, pp. 47–60. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664139.003.0003.
  50. Kuhrt A. “Greeks” and “Greece” in Mesopotamian and Persian Perspectives: A Lecture Delivered at New College, Oxford, on 7th May, 2001. Oxford: Leopard's Head Press, 2002. 32 p.
  51. Kuhrt A. The Persian Empire: A Corpus of Sources of the Achaemenid Period. London, New York, Routledge, 2007. 1020 p.
  52. Stoneman R. Xerxes. A Persian Life. New Haven, London, Yale Univ. Press, 2015. 275 p.


For citation: Rung E.V., Venidiktova E.A. Greco-Persian wars: View from Persia. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2017, vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 1404–1421. (In Russian)



The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


Версия для печати Версия для печати
Keywords: Rung, Uchenye Zapiski
Вход в личный кабинет
Ваш логин
Ваш пароль
Забыли пароль? Регистрация