Directions of knowledge and schools in historiography

R. Torstendahl

Uppsala University, Department of History, Uppsala, 751 26 Sweden

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF
DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.6.9-15

For citation: Torstendahl R. Directions of knowledge and schools in historiography. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2021, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 9–15. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.6.9-15.

Для цитирования: Torstendahl R. Directions of knowledge and schools in historiography // Учен. зап. Казан. ун-та. Сер. Гуманит. науки. – 2021. – Т. 163, кн. 6. – С. 9–15. – doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.6.9-15.

Abstract

After a short terminological introduction, this article discusses the origin of schools as collective knowledge producers. European historiography had not seen such schools until Leopold von Ranke started his teaching, which included historical research through seminars. His school became paradigmatic. However, from the late 19th century, nationalist historians, who rallied around political ideas rather than around new historical knowledge, challenged the Rankean conception. Another challenge came from historians gathering around a French journal, the Annales. From Marc Bloch and Lucien Febvre, these historians had different ideas about historical research, but there were links between the conceptions of history in the second and third generation of editors. Thereby, they also came to precede the present with its different directions of historiography based on ideas of fruitful areas for research.

Keywords: historiography, school of historiography, direction of historiography, nationalism, fruitful research, new knowledge, Leopold von Ranke, Ernst Bernheim, Johann Gustav Droysen, Heinrich von Treitschke, Marc Bloch, Fernand Braudel, Georges Duby, Emmanuel Le Roi Ladurie

References

1. Tortarolo E. Italian historical writing, 1680–1800. In: Rabasa J., Sato M., Tortarolo E., Woolf D. Oxford History of Historical Writing. Vol. 3: 1400–1800, Ch. 18. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 2012, pp. 364–383. doi: 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199219179.003.0019.
2. Eskildsen K.R. Leopold von Ranke, la passion de la critique et le séminaire d’histoire. In: Jacob Ch. (Ed.) Lieux de savoir. Espaces et communautés. Paris, Albin Michel, 2007, pp. 462–482. (In French)
3. Torstendahl R. The Rise and Propagation of Historical Professionalism. New York, London, Routledge, 2015. 258 p.
4. Rüsen J. Für eine erneuerte Historik: Studien zur Theorie der Geschichtswissenschaft. Stuttgart, Bad Cannstatt, Frommann-Holzboog, 1976. 251 S. (In German)
5. Nippel W. Johann Gustav Droysen. Ein Leben zwischen Wissenschaft und Politik. München, C.Н. Beck, 2008. 445 S. (In German)
6. Berger S., Conrad Ch. The Past as History. National Identity and Historical Consciousness in Modern Europe. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. 570 p.
7. Burke P. The French Historical Revolution. The Annales School, 1929-89. Ed. 1: Stanford Univ. Press, 1990. 152 p. Ed. 2: Cambridge, UK, Polity, 2015. 216 p.
8. Daix P. Braudel. Paris, Flammarion, 1995. 567 p.
9. Aguirre Rojas C.A. Fernand Braudel et les sciences humaines. Paris, Ed. L’Harmattan, 2004. 354 p. (In French)

Received

October 19, 2021

Rolf Torstendahl, Professor Emeritus of History

Department of History, Uppsala University

P.O. Box 628, Uppsala, 751 26 Sweden

E-mail: rolf.torstendahl@hist.uu.se

Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License