Form of presentation | Articles in international journals and collections |
Year of publication | 2014 |
|
Karimov Artur Ravilevich, author
|
Bibliographic description in the original language |
Karimov A.R. Analyticity and modality// Dialogue and universalism. Journal of the International Society For Universal Dialogue. Vol. XXIV, №3, 2014. 89-93. |
Annotation |
Dialogue and Universalism |
Keywords |
analyticity; modality; necessity; aprioricity; meaning. |
The name of the journal |
Dialogue and Universalism
|
Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=85185&p_lang=2 |
Resource files | |
|
Full metadata record |
Field DC |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Karimov Artur Ravilevich |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2014 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Karimov A.R. Analyticity and modality// Dialogue and universalism. Journal of the International Society For Universal Dialogue. Vol. XXIV, №3, 2014. 89-93. |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=85185&p_lang=2 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
Dialogue and Universalism |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
Dialogue and Universalism |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
In this paper I defend the concept of metaphysical analyticity, and argue for the no-tion of analyticity as truth in virtue of the reference determiner, introduced by Gillian K. Russell. Contrary to Russell, I try to show that necessary a posteriori statements are analytic under this notion. Also, I maintain that contingent a priori statements cannot be properly called analytic. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
|
ru_RU |
dc.title |
Analyticity and modality |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Articles in international journals and collections |
ru_RU |
|