Form of presentation | Articles in international journals and collections |
Year of publication | 2013 |
|
Nigomatullina Rezida Maskhutovna, author
Nikolaeva Evgeniya Mikhaylovna, author
|
Bibliographic description in the original language |
Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 15 (7): 966-972, 2013
The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of management as a specific field of activity.
It is shown that the crisis of modernity as a universal project has showed signs of failure of the classical
paradigm of management, which is based on linear rationality and rigid subject-object dichotomy. Modern
science has shaped the contours of a new paradigm of management based on theoretical and methodological
arsenal of self-organization theory (synergetics). Pathos of new management style is how to awaken motion
and to give impetus to evolution by small resonance effects and relevant internal organization of the system.
In this context, there is a failure of coercive control model based on a strict hierarchy of subject-object
relationship in favor of a model where subject and object of management are bound with the relationship of
assistance.
|
Annotation |
The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of management as a specific field of activity.
It is shown that the crisis of modernity as a universal project has showed signs of failure of the classical
paradigm of management, which is based on linear rationality and rigid subject-object dichotomy. Modern
science has shaped the contours of a new paradigm of management based on theoretical and methodological
arsenal of self-organization theory (synergetics). Pathos of new management style is how to awaken motion
and to give impetus to evolution by small resonance effects and relevant internal organization of the system.
In this context, there is a failure of coercive control model based on a strict hierarchy of subject-object
relationship in favor of a model where subject and object of management are bound with the relationship of
assistance.
|
Keywords |
Modern Management, Crisis of modernity, Freedom of subjectivity, Instrumental rationality,
Post-nonclassical management model, Self-organization, Structure-attractors. |
URL |
http://www.idosi.org/mejsr/mejsr15(7)13.htm |
Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=72679&p_lang=2 |
Full metadata record |
Field DC |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Nigomatullina Rezida Maskhutovna |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Nikolaeva Evgeniya Mikhaylovna |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 15 (7): 966-972, 2013
The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of management as a specific field of activity.
It is shown that the crisis of modernity as a universal project has showed signs of failure of the classical
paradigm of management, which is based on linear rationality and rigid subject-object dichotomy. Modern
science has shaped the contours of a new paradigm of management based on theoretical and methodological
arsenal of self-organization theory (synergetics). Pathos of new management style is how to awaken motion
and to give impetus to evolution by small resonance effects and relevant internal organization of the system.
In this context, there is a failure of coercive control model based on a strict hierarchy of subject-object
relationship in favor of a model where subject and object of management are bound with the relationship of
assistance.
|
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=72679&p_lang=2 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of management as a specific field of activity.
It is shown that the crisis of modernity as a universal project has showed signs of failure of the classical
paradigm of management, which is based on linear rationality and rigid subject-object dichotomy. Modern
science has shaped the contours of a new paradigm of management based on theoretical and methodological
arsenal of self-organization theory (synergetics). Pathos of new management style is how to awaken motion
and to give impetus to evolution by small resonance effects and relevant internal organization of the system.
In this context, there is a failure of coercive control model based on a strict hierarchy of subject-object
relationship in favor of a model where subject and object of management are bound with the relationship of
assistance.
|
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Modern Management |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Crisis of modernity |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Freedom of subjectivity |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Instrumental rationality |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Post-nonclassical management model |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Self-organization |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Structure-attractors. |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
Evolution of Management: From Classics of Modernity to Post-Nonclassical Paradigm |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Articles in international journals and collections |
ru_RU |
|