KFU. Card publication. Which Cultural Dimensions Predict Variations in Emotional Conformity? An Extension of Vishkin et al. (2023) Across 28 Nations

- RUS
- 中文
- ES

WHICH CULTURAL DIMENSIONS PREDICT VARIATIONS IN EMOTIONAL CONFORMITY? AN EXTENSION OF VISHKIN ET AL. (2023) ACROSS 28 NATIONS

Form of presentation

Articles in international journals and collections

Year of publication

2025

��

��

Authors, employees of KFU

Lopukhova Olga Gennadevna, author

Bibliographic description in the original language

Smith, P. B., Kirchner-Häusler, A., Grigoryan, L., Lun, V. M.-C., Lopukhova, O., (...); Castillo, V. A. (2025). Which Cultural Dimensions Predict Variations in Emotional Conformity? An Extension of Vishkin et al. (2023) Across 28 Nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221251376543

Annotation

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Keywords

Cultural Dimensions, flexibility-monumentalism, tightness-looseness, Emotional Conformity, cultural variability

The name of the journal

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

URL

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00220221251376543

Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card

https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=318225&p_lang=2

Full metadata record

Field DC	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Lopukhova Olga Gennadevna	ru_RU
dc.date.accessioned	2025-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.available	2025-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.issued	2025	ru_RU
dc.identifier.citation	Smith, P. B., Kirchner-Häusler, A., Grigoryan, L., Lun, V. M.-C., Lopukhova, O., (...); Castillo, V. A. (2025). Which Cultural Dimensions Predict Variations in Emotional Conformity? An Extension of Vishkin et al. (2023) Across 28 Nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221251376543	ru_RU
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=318225&p_lang=2	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	Despite being a classic social psychology topic, cultural variability in conformity has only been examined systematically in the last few decades. Vishkin et al. reported evidence that conformity of experienced emotions and of valued emotions is stronger in individualistic cultures. We tested the replicability of this finding using data from 28 nations (N = 6,168), incorporating two further relevant cultural predictors of cultural differences: flexibility-monumentalism and tightness-looseness. Contrasting effects regarding valence were found for conformity of experienced emotions and of valued emotions. Conformity of experienced positive emotions and of valued negative emotions was predicted by individualism, monumentalism, and looseness. The results are discussed in terms of the distinction between injunctive and descriptive norms and cultural variations in the salience of positive and negative emotions. Using additional indicators of cultural difference yields a fuller understanding of these effects than that provided by the contrast between individualism and collectivism. The use of deviation scores provides a useful operationalization of variations in conformity.	ru_RU
dc.language.iso	ru	ru_RU
dc.subject	Cultural Dimensions	ru_RU
dc.subject	flexibility-monumentalism	ru_RU
dc.subject	tightness-looseness	ru_RU
dc.subject	Emotional Conformity	ru_RU
dc.subject	cultural variability	ru_RU
dc.title	Which Cultural Dimensions Predict Variations in Emotional Conformity? An Extension of Vishkin et al. (2023) Across 28 Nations	ru_RU
dc.type	Articles in international journals and collections	ru_RU