KFU. Card publication. Deproblematization of interethnic and interconfessional relations and memory policy in the republic of Tatarstan

KAZAN
FEDERAL UNIVERSITY

- RUS
- 中文
- ES

DEPROBLEMATIZATION OF INTERETHNIC AND INTERCONFESSIONAL RELATIONS AND MEMORY POLICY IN THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN

Form of presentation

Articles in international journals and collections

Year of publication

2025

��

��

Authors, employees of KFU

Garina Karina Adgamovna, author

Eflova Mariya Yurevna, author

Maksimova Olga Aleksandrovna, author

Mayakovskaya Anastasiya Vladimirovna, author

Bibliographic description in the original language

Eflova M, Garina K, Maximova O, Mayakovskaya A, Deproblematization of interethnic and interconfessional relations and memory policy in the republic of Tatarstan//INTERACCION Y PERSPECTIVA. - 2025. - Vol.15, Is.1. - .

Annotation

A key factor of consolidation and harmony in any society is a responsible and respectful attitude to its past. The study of the relationship between memory politics and the identities of ethnic groups, for whom the origin and sense of a shared past consolidates solidarity in the present, determines the perceptions of their identity and relations with other groups, is particularly significant. The article presents the results of the study of the Politics of Memory in the Republic of Tatarstan and considers the processes of turning to the Bulgarian period as a source that can be referred to in order to explain the foundations and current trends of events in politics, religion, art and even to analyze a number of ethical issues (such as patriotism, tolerance, etc.). Representations of the Bulgarian period help to build an image of a self-evident «natural peace« between representatives of different ethnic groups and confessions in the region. The strategy works primarily through such channels as the media, statements by officials, and education. The positive effect of such a memory policy is to establish tolerance as a norm that is used for socialization within the framework of the institution of education, while the negative effect is related to the fact that the problems of interaction between multiple ethnic groups and confessions can be attributed to chance, and lead to the eventual ignoring of systemic problems.

Keywords

ethnicity, confession, politics of memory, social memory, tourism, places of memory.

The name of the journal

INTERACCION Y PERSPECTIVA

URL

https://zenodo.org/records/14031749

Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card

https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=307718&p_lang=2

Full metadata record

Field DC	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Garina Karina Adgamovna	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Eflova Mariya Yurevna	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Maksimova Olga Aleksandrovna	ru_RU
dc.contributor.author	Mayakovskaya Anastasiya Vladimirovna	ru_RU
dc.date.accessioned	2025-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.available	2025-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.issued	2025	ru_RU
dc.identifier.citation	Eflova M, Garina K, Maximova O, Mayakovskaya A, Deproblematization of interethnic and interconfessional relations and memory policy in the republic of Tatarstan//INTERACCION Y PERSPECTIVA. - 2025. - Vol.15, Is.1. - .	ru_RU
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=307718&p_lang=2	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	INTERACCION Y PERSPECTIVA	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	A key factor of consolidation and harmony in any society is a responsible and respectful attitude to its past. The study of the relationship between memory politics and the identities of ethnic groups, for whom the origin and sense of a shared past consolidates solidarity in the present, determines the perceptions of their identity and relations with other groups, is particularly significant. The article presents the results of the study of the Politics of Memory in the Republic of Tatarstan and considers the processes of turning to the Bulgarian period as a source that can be referred to in order to explain the foundations and current trends of events in politics, religion, art and even to analyze a number of ethical issues (such as patriotism, tolerance, etc.). Representations of the Bulgarian period help to build an image of a self-evident «natural peace« between representatives of different ethnic groups and confessions in the region. The strategy works primarily through such channels as the media, statements by officials, and education. The positive effect of such a memory policy is to establish tolerance as a norm that is used for socialization within the framework of the institution of education, while the negative effect is related to the fact that the problems of interaction between multiple ethnic groups and confessions can be attributed to chance, and lead to the eventual ignoring of systemic problems.	ru_RU
dc.language.iso	ru	ru_RU
dc.subject	ethnicity	ru_RU
dc.subject	confession	ru_RU
dc.subject	politics of memory	ru_RU
dc.subject	social memory	ru_RU
dc.subject	tourism	ru_RU
dc.subject	places of memory.	ru_RU
dc.title	Deproblematization of interethnic and interconfessional relations and memory policy in the republic of Tatarstan	ru_RU
dc.type	Articles in international journals and collections	ru_RU