Form of presentation | Articles in Russian journals and collections |
Year of publication | 2022 |
Язык | русский |
|
Karimov Artur Ravilevich, author
Khort Mikhail Gennadevich, author
|
|
Fayzikhodzhaeva Dilbar Ergashevna, author
|
Bibliographic description in the original language |
Karimov A., Fayzikhodjaeva D., Khort M. The Virtue Approach To The Analysis Of Informal Argumentation // Res Militaris. - vol.12, №2. -Summer-Autumn 2022. - P. 2541-2548. |
Annotation |
Res Militaris |
Keywords |
public discourse, epistemology of virtues, argumentation theory, justification theory, internalism, informal fallacies, intellectual virtues, intellectual vices. |
The name of the journal |
Res Militaris
|
On-line resource for training course |
http://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/net/173296/F_Karimov_et_al._virtue_argumentation.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
|
URL |
https://resmilitaris.net/menu-script/index.php/resmilitaris/article/view/340/217 |
Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=272194&p_lang=2 |
Resource files | |
|
Full metadata record |
Field DC |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Karimov Artur Ravilevich |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Khort Mikhail Gennadevich |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Fayzikhodzhaeva Dilbar Ergashevna |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2022 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Karimov A., Fayzikhodjaeva D., Khort M. The Virtue Approach To The Analysis Of Informal Argumentation // Res Militaris. - vol.12, №2. -Summer-Autumn 2022. - P. 2541-2548. |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=272194&p_lang=2 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
Res Militaris |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
This article substantiates the relevance of personality qualities, such as epistemic virtues and epistemic vices, for the interpretation of informal argumentationin public discourse. An internalist approach to argumentation is suggested. From this perspective, «good« argumentation is defined as «virtuous« and faulty argumentation as «vicious. The interpretation of some informalfallaciesof argumentation in the context of virtue theory is considered: “Ad Hominem”, «Straw Man,«“Argument to Authority”. It is shown that reference to the conceptual apparatus of virtue theory reveals justified and unjustified uses of these arguments. Some criticisms of the use of the aretaic approach to argumentation in general are also discussed. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
public discourse |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
epistemology of virtues |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
argumentation theory |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
justification theory |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
internalism |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
informal fallacies |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
intellectual virtues |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
intellectual vices. |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
The Virtue Approach To The Analysis Of Informal Argumentation |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Articles in Russian journals and collections |
ru_RU |
|