Form of presentation | Articles in international journals and collections |
Year of publication | 2022 |
Язык | английский |
|
Masalimova Alfiya Rafisovna, author
|
Bibliographic description in the original language |
Sudakova, N.E.; Savina, T.N.; Masalimova, A.R.; Mikhaylovsky, M.N.; Karandeeva, L.G.; Zhdanov, S.P. Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis. Education Sciences. 2022, 12, 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030209 |
Annotation |
Assessment is critical in postsecondary education, as it is at all levels. Assessments are classified into four types: diagnostic, summative, evaluative, and formative. Recent trends in assessment have migrated away from summative to formative evaluations. Formative evaluations help students develop expertise and concentrate their schedules, ease student anxiety, instill a feeling of ownership in students as they go, and confirm the module's subject notion. Online formative assessment (OFA) emerged as a result of the convergence of formative and computer-assisted assessment research. Bibliometric analyses provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of a study topic across a particular time period. We used a PRISMA-compliant bibliometric method. The Scopus database was searched for BibTex-formatted publication data. In total, 898 studies were analyzed. According to the results, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and Computers & Education are the most influential sources |
Keywords |
online formative assessment; higher education; bibliometrics analysis |
The name of the journal |
Education Sciences
|
URL |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/3/209 |
Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=269280&p_lang=2 |
Resource files | |
|
Full metadata record |
Field DC |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Masalimova Alfiya Rafisovna |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2022 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Sudakova, N.E.; Savina, T.N.; Masalimova, A.R.; Mikhaylovsky, M.N.; Karandeeva, L.G.; Zhdanov, S.P. Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis. Education Sciences. 2022, 12, 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030209 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=269280&p_lang=2 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
Education Sciences |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
Assessment is critical in postsecondary education, as it is at all levels. Assessments are classified into four types: diagnostic, summative, evaluative, and formative. Recent trends in assessment have migrated away from summative to formative evaluations. Formative evaluations help students develop expertise and concentrate their schedules, ease student anxiety, instill a feeling of ownership in students as they go, and confirm the module's subject notion. Online formative assessment (OFA) emerged as a result of the convergence of formative and computer-assisted assessment research. Bibliometric analyses provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of a study topic across a particular time period. We used a PRISMA-compliant bibliometric method. The Scopus database was searched for BibTex-formatted publication data. In total, 898 studies were analyzed. According to the results, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and Computers & Education are the most influential sources |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
|
ru_RU |
dc.title |
Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Articles in international journals and collections |
ru_RU |
|