Form of presentation | Articles in international journals and collections |
Year of publication | 2020 |
Язык | английский |
|
Gizatova Gyulnaz Kazbekovna, author
Ivanova Olga Gennadevna, author
Karimov Artur Ravilevich, author
Stepanenko German Nikolaevich, author
Tereshhenko Natalya Anatolevna, author
Shatunova Tatyana Mikhaylovna, author
|
Bibliographic description in the original language |
Science as a Mythologized Phenomenon / G.K. Gizatova, O.G. Ivanova, A.R. Karimov [at al.] // International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. - 2020. - Vol. 24, Issue 05. - P. 4640-4651. - DOI: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I5/PR2020177. -
ISSN: 1475-7192. |
Annotation |
It is commonly believed that the scientific discourse is free from mythological stratification and that this freedom is provided by the profound theoretical nature of strict rationality. However, the practice of sociohumanitarian research gives reason to believe that scientific discourse also has a narrative character. The main idea of this article is to identify the limits for the scientific theory possibilities and to discover ways to mythologize scientific discourse. This is important, since the abolition of purely rationalistic approaches leads to the appearance of «blind spot«, which does not allow us to see and analyze new trends in real life. During the study the methods of classical and negative dialectics were used, as well as the principle of deconstruction, developed in the framework of postmodern discourse and beyond its borders. These approaches are combined in the logic of coincidenceology, which makes it possible to combine previously incompatible methodologies. As a result of the analysis, it was revealed that the scientific discourse can be subject to mythologization/ideologization, and claims for the ability to demythologize large narratives by “scientification” are illusory. Moreover, the scientific theory itself can be adequate to its subject only when it goes beyond its boundaries, capturing marginal areas of knowledge, including the metaphysical component. |
Keywords |
Mythologization, Globalization, Demythologization, Methodology, Scientific Discourse |
The name of the journal |
International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation
|
On-line resource for training course |
http://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/net/158539/F_Science_as_a_Mithological_Phenomenon19_0079_PR2020177.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
|
URL |
https://www.psychosocial.com/article/PR2020177/20372/ |
Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=232168&p_lang=2 |
Resource files | |
|
Full metadata record |
Field DC |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Gizatova Gyulnaz Kazbekovna |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Ivanova Olga Gennadevna |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Karimov Artur Ravilevich |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Stepanenko German Nikolaevich |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Tereshhenko Natalya Anatolevna |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Shatunova Tatyana Mikhaylovna |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2020 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Science as a Mythologized Phenomenon / G.K. Gizatova, O.G. Ivanova, A.R. Karimov [at al.] // International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. - 2020. - Vol. 24, Issue 05. - P. 4640-4651. - DOI: 10.37200/IJPR/V24I5/PR2020177. -
ISSN: 1475-7192. |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=232168&p_lang=2 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
It is commonly believed that the scientific discourse is free from mythological stratification and that this freedom is provided by the profound theoretical nature of strict rationality. However, the practice of sociohumanitarian research gives reason to believe that scientific discourse also has a narrative character. The main idea of this article is to identify the limits for the scientific theory possibilities and to discover ways to mythologize scientific discourse. This is important, since the abolition of purely rationalistic approaches leads to the appearance of «blind spot«, which does not allow us to see and analyze new trends in real life. During the study the methods of classical and negative dialectics were used, as well as the principle of deconstruction, developed in the framework of postmodern discourse and beyond its borders. These approaches are combined in the logic of coincidenceology, which makes it possible to combine previously incompatible methodologies. As a result of the analysis, it was revealed that the scientific discourse can be subject to mythologization/ideologization, and claims for the ability to demythologize large narratives by “scientification” are illusory. Moreover, the scientific theory itself can be adequate to its subject only when it goes beyond its boundaries, capturing marginal areas of knowledge, including the metaphysical component. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Mythologization |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Globalization |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Demythologization |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Methodology |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Scientific Discourse |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
Science as a Mythologized Phenomenon |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Articles in international journals and collections |
ru_RU |
|