KFU. Card publication. Loan agreement: urgent questions of legal regulation

KAZAN
FEDERAL UNIVERSITY

- RUS
- 中文
- ES

LOAN AGREEMENT: URGENT QUESTIONS OF LEGAL REGULATION

Form of presentation

Articles in Russian journals and collections

Year of publication

2018

Язык

английский

Authors, employees of KFU

Khabirov Artur Ilfarovich, author

Bibliographic description in the original language

Artur Khabirov. Loan agreement: urgent questions of legal regulation. Kazan University Law Review. 2018; 2 (3): 74–86.

Annotation

The article discusses the question of a bilateral character of the loan agreement contract. It validates a conclusion about the existence in the loan agreement of the rights not only for the lessor (traditional approach), but also for the borrower. In educational and scientific literature in connection with the subjective rights and obligations of the loan agreement parties there prevails an opinion that the obligation under the contract of a monetary loan is unilaterally binding as the authorized party (the creditor) is always a lessor and the bound party (the debtor) is always a borrower. At the same time, it is necessary to differentiate a contract of a monetary loan and a contract of a commodity loan in connection with differences in a set of the bilateral rights and duties of the lessor and borrower. The article also studies the question of a weak party in the loan contract.

Keywords

bilaterally binding, borrower, loan agreement, lessor, rights of the borrower, weak party.

The name of the journal

KAZAN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW

On-line resource for training course

http://dspace.kpfu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/net/151614/F_KULR_2_2018_Khabirov.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card

https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=184188&p_lang=2

Resource files

File name	Size (MB)	Format
F_KULR_2_2018_Khabirov.pdf	0,16	pdf	show / download

Full metadata record

Field DC	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Khabirov Artur Ilfarovich	ru_RU
dc.date.accessioned	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.available	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z	ru_RU
dc.date.issued	2018	ru_RU
dc.identifier.citation	Artur Khabirov. Loan agreement: urgent questions of legal regulation. Kazan University Law Review. 2018; 2 (3): 74–86.	ru_RU
dc.identifier.uri	https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=184188&p_lang=2	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	KAZAN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW	ru_RU
dc.description.abstract	The article discusses the question of a bilateral character of the loan agreement contract. It validates a conclusion about the existence in the loan agreement of the rights not only for the lessor (traditional approach), but also for the borrower. In educational and scientific literature in connection with the subjective rights and obligations of the loan agreement parties there prevails an opinion that the obligation under the contract of a monetary loan is unilaterally binding as the authorized party (the creditor) is always a lessor and the bound party (the debtor) is always a borrower. At the same time, it is necessary to differentiate a contract of a monetary loan and a contract of a commodity loan in connection with differences in a set of the bilateral rights and duties of the lessor and borrower. The article also studies the question of a weak party in the loan contract.	ru_RU
dc.language.iso	ru	ru_RU
dc.subject	bilaterally binding	ru_RU
dc.subject	borrower	ru_RU
dc.subject	loan agreement	ru_RU
dc.subject	lessor	ru_RU
dc.subject	rights of the borrower	ru_RU
dc.subject	weak party.	ru_RU
dc.title	Loan agreement: urgent questions of legal regulation	ru_RU
dc.type	Articles in Russian journals and collections	ru_RU