Form of presentation | Articles in international journals and collections |
Year of publication | 2017 |
Язык | английский |
|
Arslanov Kamil Maratovich, author
Khabirov Artur Ilfarovich, author
|
Bibliographic description in the original language |
Arslanov K.M., Khabirov A.I. About the bilateral character of the debt contract / K.M. Arslanov, A.I. Khabirov // National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald. - 2017. - № 4. - P. 99-103. |
Annotation |
In work the question about bilateral (the bilateral responsibility) character of the loan agreement is investigated. A conclusion about existence in the loan agreement of the rights not only for the lessor (traditional approach), but also for the borrower is proved. In educational and scientific literature in connection with the subjective rights and obligations of the loan agreement parties the opinion prevails that the obligation under the contract of a monetary loan is unilaterally binding as the authorized party - the creditor – who is always the lessor, and the borrower [4 will always be bound party - the debtor-; 390]. At the same time it is necessary to differentiate the contract monetary and the contract of a commodity (real) loan in connection with differences in a set of the bilateral rights and duties of the lessor and borrower. |
Keywords |
loan agreement, bilaterally binding character, rights of the borrower |
The name of the journal |
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MANAGERIAL STAFF OF CULTURE AND ARTS HERALD
|
Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=173020&p_lang=2 |
Resource files | |
|
Full metadata record |
Field DC |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Arslanov Kamil Maratovich |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Khabirov Artur Ilfarovich |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Arslanov K.M., Khabirov A.I. About the bilateral character of the debt contract / K.M. Arslanov, A.I. Khabirov // National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald. - 2017. - № 4. - P. 99-103. |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=173020&p_lang=2 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF MANAGERIAL STAFF OF CULTURE AND ARTS HERALD |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
In work the question about bilateral (the bilateral responsibility) character of the loan agreement is investigated. A conclusion about existence in the loan agreement of the rights not only for the lessor (traditional approach), but also for the borrower is proved. In educational and scientific literature in connection with the subjective rights and obligations of the loan agreement parties the opinion prevails that the obligation under the contract of a monetary loan is unilaterally binding as the authorized party - the creditor – who is always the lessor, and the borrower [4 will always be bound party - the debtor-; 390]. At the same time it is necessary to differentiate the contract monetary and the contract of a commodity (real) loan in connection with differences in a set of the bilateral rights and duties of the lessor and borrower. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
loan agreement |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
bilaterally binding character |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
rights of the borrower |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
About the bilateral character of the debt contrac |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Articles in international journals and collections |
ru_RU |
|