Form of presentation | Articles in international journals and collections |
Year of publication | 2017 |
Язык | английский |
|
Magid Evgeniy Arkadevich, author
Sagitov Artur Gazizovich, author
|
Bibliographic description in the original language |
Sagitov A., Shabalina K., Lavrenov R., & Magid E. Comparing fiducial marker systems in the presence of occlusion // ICMSC 2017 - International Conference on Mechanical, System and Control Engineering (St.Petersburg, Russia; 19-21 May 2017) - p. 377-382. |
Annotation |
MATEC Web of Conferences |
Keywords |
Cameras, Calibration, Robot vision systems, Shape, Augmented reality, Reliability |
The name of the journal |
MATEC Web of Conferences
|
URL |
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7959505/ |
Please use this ID to quote from or refer to the card |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=161681&p_lang=2 |
Resource files | |
|
Full metadata record |
Field DC |
Value |
Language |
dc.contributor.author |
Magid Evgeniy Arkadevich |
ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author |
Sagitov Artur Gazizovich |
ru_RU |
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.available |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
ru_RU |
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation |
Sagitov A., Shabalina K., Lavrenov R., & Magid E. Comparing fiducial marker systems in the presence of occlusion // ICMSC 2017 - International Conference on Mechanical, System and Control Engineering (St.Petersburg, Russia; 19-21 May 2017) - p. 377-382. |
ru_RU |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://repository.kpfu.ru/eng/?p_id=161681&p_lang=2 |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
MATEC Web of Conferences |
ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract |
A fiducial marker system is a system of unique 2D (planar) marker, which is placed in an environment and automatically will be detected with a camera with a help of a corresponding detection algorithm. Application areas of these markers include industrial systems, augmented reality, robots navigation, human-robot interaction and others. Marker system designed for such different applications must be robust to such factors as view angles, occlusions, changing distances, etc. This paper compares three existing systems of markers: ARTag, AprilTag, and CALTag. As a benchmark, we use their reliability and detection rate in presence of occlusions of various types and intensity. The paper presents experimental comparison of these markers. The marker detection was performed with a simple inexpensive Web camera. |
ru_RU |
dc.language.iso |
ru |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Cameras |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Calibration |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Robot vision systems |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Shape |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Augmented reality |
ru_RU |
dc.subject |
Reliability |
ru_RU |
dc.title |
Comparing Fiducial Marker Systems in the Presence of Occlusion |
ru_RU |
dc.type |
Articles in international journals and collections |
ru_RU |
|