On the problem of the 'unnamed' in civil law

S.I. Suslovа

Irkutsk Institute (Branch), All-Russian State University of Justice, Irkutsk, 664011 Russia

E-mail: svetsuslova@yandex.ru

Received December 27, 2017

Full text PDF

Abstract

The paper considers the problem of understanding the “unnamed” in civil law, various approaches to it in accordance with the definition in legislation and civil doctrine. Examples have been given to show how the number of cases of application of the term increases in the legal literature. It has been suggested to distinguish between the concepts of “gap in law” and “unnamed”. It has been argued that they should be considered through the prism of such philosophical categories as “cause” and “consequence”. The phenomenon of qualified silence of the legislator and its relationship with the concept of “gap in law” have been analyzed. In the legal literature, the basis for their distinction is laid in the intention of the legislator. This criterion is subjective. Accordingly, a “gap in law” arises in the event of omission of the legislator, and qualified silence arises when there is a targeted law-making policy. It has been proposed to abandon the subjective criterion and the characteristics of the gap in law from the position of a positive or negative phenomenon. The “gap in law” is an objective category indicating that there is no provision in the law that would directly regulate the relationship that has arisen. Subjective and objective points matter when interpreting the rights and responding to the established paths and determining the ways to eliminate them. The choice of the directly fixed, allowable, alternative, and forbidden “unnamed” has been justified.

Keywords: unnamed, gap in law, analogy of law, analogy of right, qualified silence

References

  1. Markov P.A. Reorganizatsiya kommercheskikh organizatsii: problemy teorii i praktiki [Reorganization of Commercial Organizations: Problems of Theory and Practice]. Moscow, Norma, INFRA-M, 2012. 320 p. (In Russian)
  2. Akhmedov A.Ya. Definition of the unnamed contract. Vestnik Saratovskoi Gosudarstvennoi Yuridicheskoi Akademii, 2014, no. 2, pp. 141–146. (In Russian)
  3. Syatchikhin A.V. The Russian legislation on the named and unnamed ways of providing obligations: Historical insight. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Yuridicheskie Nauki, 2014, no. 1, pp. 156–163. (In Russian)
  4. Torkin D.A. Unnamed ways of securing obligations. Cand. Leg. Sci. Diss. Tyumen, 2005. 182 p. (In Russian)
  5. Valeev D.Kh., Zaitsev A.I., Fetyukhin M.V. Kommentarii k Federal’nomu zakonu ot 24 iyulya 2002 g. № 102-FZ “O treteiskikh sudakh v Rossiiskoi Federatsii” (postateinyi) [Commentary to the Federal Law of July 24, 2002 No. 102-FZ “On Arbitration Courts in the Russian Federation” (Paragraph by Paragraph)]. Moscow, Statut, 2015. SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. (In Russian)
  6. Belov V.A. The unnamed object of lease contract. Vestnik Moskovskogo Finansovogo Yuridicheskogo Universiteta, 2014, no. 1, pp. 87–91. (In Russian)
  7. Rozhkova M.A. (Ed.) Zashchita delovoi reputatsii v sluchayakh ee diffamatsii ili nepravomernogo ispol'zovaniya (v sfere kommercheskikh otnoshenii) [Protection of Business Reputation in Cases of Defamation or Unlawful Use (in the Field of Commercial Relations)]. Moscow, Statut, 2015. 269 p. (In Russian)
  8. Abramova E. E-money as an unnamed object of civil rights. Khozyaistvo i Parvo, 2016, no. 7, pp. 3–15. (In Russian)
  9. Petrov E.Yu. Osnovy nasledstvennogo prava Rossii, Germanii, Frantsii [The Basics of Inheritance Law in Russia, Germany, and France]. Moscow, Statut, 2015. SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. (In Russian)
  10. Krasheninnikov P.V. (Ed.) Postateinyi kommentarii k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii, chasti vtoroi [Paragraph-by-Paragraph Commentary to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part Two]. Vol. 3. Moscow, Statut, 2011. SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. (In Russian)
  11. Yarkov V.V. (Ed.) Kommentarii k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postateinyi) [Commentary on the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (Paragraph by Paragraph). Moscow, Infotopik Media, 2011. SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. (In Russian)
  12. Egorova M.A., Krylov V.G., Romanov A.K. Deliktnye obyazatel’stva i deliktnaya otvetstvennost’ v angliiskom, nemetskom i frantsuzskom prave [Delictual Obligations and Liability in English, German, and French Law]. Moscow, Yustitsinform, 2017. 375 p. (In Russian)
  13. Akhmedov A.Ya. Atypical institutions of Russian civil law: Problem formulation. Vestnik Saratovskoi Gosudarstvennoi Yuridicheskoi Akadaemii, 2017, no. 4, pp. 127–130. (In Russian)
  14. Lazarev V.V. (Ed.) Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva [General Theory of Law and State]. Moscow, Norma, INFRA-M, 2014. 592 p. (In Russian)
  15. Polyakov A.V. Obshchaya teoriya prava: fenomenologo-kommunikativnyi podkhod [General Theory of Law: Phenomenological and Communicative Approach]. St. Petersburg, Yurid. Tsentr Press, 2003. 845 p. (In Russian)
  16. Fomina L.A. Law analogy and right analogy in the system of ways to overcome gaps in civil law. Extended Abstract of Cand. Leg. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2009. 27 p. (In Russian)
  17. Demin A.V. Printsip opredelennosti nalogooblozheniya [The Certainty Principle of Taxation]. Moscow, Statut, 2015. SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. (In Russian)
  18. Spektor E.I. Some aspects of application of the institution of analogy in administrative legislation. Pravo i Ekonomika, 2002, no. 7, pp. 49–54. (In Russian)
  19. Marchenko M.N. (Ed.) Obshchaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademicheskii kurs v 3-kh tomakh [General Theory of State and Law. Academic Course in 3 Volumes]. Vol. 2: Law. Moscow, Norma, 2007. 802 p. (In Russian)
  20. Drobyshevskii S.A., Tikhonravov E.Yu. Sposoby vospolneniya probelov v prave [Ways to Fill Legal Gaps]. Moscow, Norma, 2014. 176 p. (In Russian)
  21. Podshivalov T.P. Interdiction of evasion of law in the Russian civil legislation and judicial practice. Vestnik Grazhdanskogo Prava, 2015, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 87–115. (In Russian)
  22. Mumladze D.G. Evolution of the concept of causality in Soviet criminology. Cand. Leg. Sci. Diss. Tbilisi, 1990. 158 p. (In Russian)
  23. Ter-Akopov A.A. Prestuplenie i problemy nefizicheskoi prichinnosti v ugolovnom prave [Crime and Problems of Non-Physical Causality in Criminal Law]. Moscow, Yurkniga. 2003. 480 p. (In Russian)
  24. Soktoev Z.B. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovy prichinnosti v ugolovnom prave [Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Causality in Criminal Law]. Moscow, YUNITI, Zakon i Pravo, 2012. 311 p. (In Russian)
  25. Migacheva A.Yu. On the necessity of research on the principle of determinism in connection with the development of the methodology of civil jurisprudence. Teoriya i Praktika Obshchestvennogo Razvitiya, 2009, nos. 3-4, pp. 296–301. (In Russian)
  26. Vasil’ev V.V. Determinism in the system of civil law of the Russian Federation. Extended Abstract of Doct. Leg. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2015. 59 p. (In Russian)
  27. Gutner G.B. Reason and consequence. In: Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya [New Philosophical Encyclopedia]. Moscow, Mysl’, 2010. Available at: https://iphlib.ru/greenstone3/library/collection/ newphilenc/document/HASHde7f44a666a6b6a6acdcde. (In Russian)
  28. Gavrilov E.V. Apologizing as a way to protect honor, dignity, and business reputation. Zakonodatel’stvo i Ekonomika, 2012, no. 7, pp. 16–21. (In Russian)

 

For citation: Suslovа S.I. On the problem of the “unnamed” in civil law. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2018, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 404–414. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.