Distinguishing the crime specified by Article 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from related crimes

A.Yu. Terekhov

Aviastroitelnyi District Court of Kazan, Kazan, 420127 Russia

E-mail: tay555@bk.ru

Received December 8, 2020

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.2.120-131

For citation: Terekhov A.Yu. Distinguishing the crime specified by Article 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from related crimes. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2021, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 120–131. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.2.120-131. (In Russian)

Abstract

The legal aspects enabling the distinguishing of the crime specified by Art. 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation from related crimes with similar subjects of encroachment were analyzed. The elements of the crimes under the above-said article, as well as their objective and subjective characteristics and the nature of the related crimes were discussed. The study was performed with the use of comparative, systematic, and terminological analysis, along with the methods of generalization. Based on the results obtained, the crimes provided by the article under consideration can be reliably differentiated from the related ones, which is extremely important for further development of the theoretical background of research on crimes in the field of shared construction. The value of the conclusions is obvious for further research on crimes in the field of shared construction, as well as for the subjects of law enforcement activity.

Keywords: attraction of financial resources, shared construction, shared participation, differentiation of crimes, criminal liability in shared construction field

References

  1. Men’shagin V.D. Sovetskoe ugolovnoe pravo [Soviet Criminal Law]. No. 1. Moscow, Yurid. Lit., 1938. 184 p. (In Russian)
  2. Nikiforov B.S. Ob”ekt prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [Object of Crime in Soviet Criminal Law]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat, 1960. 228 p. (In Russian)
  3. Novoselov G.P. Uchenie ob ob”ekte prestupleniya. Metodologicheskie aspekty [The Doctrine of Object of Crime. Methodological Aspects]. Moscow, Norma, 2001. 208 p. (In Russian)
  4. Pavlenko O.V., Zimneva S.V. Criminal liability for violation of the legislation on participation in shared construction. Yuridicheskaya Nauka i Pravookhranitel’naya Praktika, 2017, no. 1, pp. 68–73. (In Russian)
  5. Gladkih V.I., Sukharenko A.N. Criminal protection of shared construction participants. Bezopasnost’ Biznesa, 2016, no. 4, pp. 31–34. (In Russian)
  6. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast’ [Criminal Law. General Part]. Inogamova-Khegai L.V.,   Rarog A.I., Chuchaev A.I. (Eds.). Moscow, Yurid. Firma “KONTRAKT”, INFRA-M, 2008. 560 p. (In Russian)
  7. Nechaev A.D. Attracting financial resources of citizens in violation of the legislation on participation in shared construction. Tatishchevskie chteniya: aktual’nye problemy nauki i praktiki. Materialy XV Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Tatishchev Lectures: Urgent Problems of Science and Practice. Proc. XV Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf.]. Tolyatti, Volzh. Univ. im. V.N. Tatishcheva, 2018, vol. 3, pp. 256–261. (In Russian)
  8. Shevyakov R. Criminal liability of builders for violation of the law on participation in shared construction. “Dol’shchik” Company. Available at: http://zashhitadol'shhikov.rf/articles/154-criminal/. (In Russian)
  9. Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (nauchno-prakticheskii) [The Commentary to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Research and Practice)]. Chuchaev A.I. (Ed.). Moscow, Prospekt, 2019. 1536 p. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.