The idea of a regular army and the pamphlet war in England during the late 17th – early 18th centuries

D.O. Gordienko

Samara State Institute of Culture, Samara, 443010 Russia

E-mail: Stuartssergant@yandex.ru

Received April 16, 2018

Full text PDF

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the attitude of the British public to the problem of creation and development of a regular army in the Three Kingdoms during the second half of 17th – early 18th centuries. After the civil wars in the middle of the 17th century, the regular army institution was established in England. The problem of army and tyranny favored by it was little discussed in the English press until 1688   because of the censorship. After the Glorious Revolution, criticism or apologetics of the idea of creating a regular royal army became an interesting and popular theme for British pamphlets. In the late 17th century, John Trenchard was the leading author, who criticized the regular army as a tool of tyranny. Daniel Defoe, who defended the view that armed forces are needed to defend the state and religious independence of Great Britain, developed an active debate with him. Many other publicists both actively supported and opposed regular army establishment in the Three Kingdoms. The problem remained relevant to the British public until the second half of the 18th century.

Keywords: pamphlet, regular army, Stuarts, Three Kingdoms

References

  1. Stankov K.N. Korol’ Yakov II i stanovlenie dvizheniya yakobitov, 1685–1701 [King James II of England and Jacobitism Development, 1685–1701]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, 2014. 416 p. (In Russian)
  2. Pincus S. 1688. The First Modern Revolution. Yale Univ. Press, 2011. 647 p.
  3. A Discourse about Raising Men; in which is shewed, That it is more for the Interests of the Nation that the Parishes should be Oblig’d by Law to provide Men for the Service of the War, than to continue to Raise ’em in the Ordinary Way: And all Objections are Answered; and particularly that Popular one, viz. London, Printed for R. Baldwin, 1696. 32 p.
  4. The Several Debates of the House of Commons, in the Reign of the Late King James II. Pro & Contra. London, 1697. 30 p.
  5. Trenchard J. An Argument, Shewing, that A Standing Army Is inconsistent with A Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy, 1–2 parts, 1697. In: Trenchard J., Gordon T. A collection of tracts. Vol. 1. London, Printed for F. Cogan, 1739, pp. 3–47.
  6. Trenchard J. A Letter from the Author of the Argument against a Standing Army, to the Author of the Ballancing Letter. In: Trenchard J., Gordon T. A collection of tracts. Vol. 1. London, Printed for F. Cogan, 1739, pp. 48–56.
  7. Trenchard J. Some Reflection On a Pamphlet, lately Publish’d, Entituled An Argument, Shewing, that A Standing Army Is inconsistent with A Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy. London, Printed for E. Whitlock, 1697. 40 p.
  8. Trenchard J. A Short History of Standing Armies in England, 1698. In: Trenchard J., Gordon T. A collection of tracts. Vol. 1. London, Printed for F. Cogan, 1739, pp. 57–107.
  9. Defoe D. A Brief Reply to the History of Standing Armies in England. With Some Account of the Authors. London, 1698. 44 p.
  10. Defoe D. An Apology for the Army. In a short Essay on Fortitude, &c. London, Printed for J. Roberts, 1715. 80 p.
  11. Trenchard J. The Case of a Standing Army Fairly and Impartially Stated. In Answer to the Late History of Standing Armies in England: And other pamphlets writ on that subjects. London, 1698. 44 p.
  12. Trenchard J. Reflections on the Short History of Standing Armies in England. London, 1699. 44 p.
  13. A Letter to A, B, C, D, E, F, &c, Concerning Their Argument about a Standing Army; Examining Their Notions of the Supposed Gothick, or Other Ballance, by the Constitution and Interest of the English Monarchy. London, Printed for D. Brown, R. Smith, 1698. 48 p.
  14. The Argument against a Standing Army, Discuss’d by a True Lover of His Country. London, Printed and sold by E. Whitlock, 1698. 52 p.
  15. Johnson S. A Confutation of a Late Pamphlet Intituled, a Letter Ballancing the Necessity of Keeping a Land Force in Time of Peace, With the Dangers That May Follow on It. London, Printed for A. Boldwin, 1698. 43 p.
  16. The Seaman’s Opinion of a Standing Army in England in Opposition to a Fleet at Sea the Best Security of this Kingdom: In a Letter to a Merchant Written by a Sailor. London, Printed and Sold by the Booksellers of London and Westminster, 1699. 30 p.
  17. Trenchard J. Reasons Against a Standing Army. London, Printed and sold by J. Morphew, and the Booksellers of London and Westminster, 1717. 76 p.
  18. Shippen W., Jeffres E., Hanmer T. Three Speeches Against Continuing the Army, etc.: As They Were Spoken in the House of Commons the Last Session of Parliament, to Which are Added the Reasons Given by the Lords, who Protested Against the Bill for Punishing Mutiny and Desertion. London, Printed for W. Johnson, 1718. 46 p.

 

For citation: Gordienko D.O. The idea of a regular army and the pamphlet war in England during the late 17th – early 18th centuries. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2018, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 761–771. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.