O.V. Sushkova

All-Russian State University of Justice (RPA, Ministry of Justice of Russia), Moscow, 117638 Russia

Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Moscow, 125993 Russia

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation, Moscow, 119571 Russia

E-mail: ovsushkova@mail.ru

Received December 27, 2017

Full text PDF

Abstract

The paper substantiates various legal approaches to systemic stimulation of innovations created not only to expand the scope of economic turnover, but also to improve academic science and its relationship with business entities. Based on this approach, the importance and timeliness of the systematization of all “patent information”, which is in various sources and does not fully provide an idea of the economic effectiveness of the results of intellectual activity, have been demonstrated. Having touched upon these problems, the essential role played by the fairness of competitive relations when introducing any innovations or their improvements to the market by business entities has been revealed. In particular, it has been noted that unscrupulous subjects of the economic turnover artificially register new objects of intellectual activity with the aim of creating unfair competition in the market and its monopoly seizure. The obtained results have a significant legal significance for elimination of the above-mentioned problems of the systemic nature by creating a holistic concept of legal regulation of objects, entities, contractual structures, and antimonopoly legislation.

Keywords: results of intellectual activity, innovations, subjects of entrepreneurial activity, act of unfair competition, patent information, biotechnologies

References

  1. Smith A. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Oxford, Clarendon Press. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 1978. 610 p.
  2. Mill J.S. Principles of Political Economy. Books IV and V. London, Penguin Books, 1985. 388 p.
  3. Bentham J. Manual of political economy. In: Stark W. (Ed.) Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings. Vol. 1. New York, Burt Franklin, 1952, pp. 219–269.
  4. Rosenberg N. Technology and American Economic Growth. New York, Harper and Row, 1972. 211 p.
  5. Gavrilov D.A. Legal protection against unfair competition in the field of exclusive rights to means of individualization. Cand. Leg. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2013. 193 p. (In Russian)
  6. Pirogova V.V. Exhaustion of rights to a trademark. Extended Abstract of Cand. Leg. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2002. 19 p. (In Russian)
  7. Belaya O.V., Kiseleva M.E., Kitsai Yu.A. et al. Universitet 3.0. Problemy pravovogo soprovozhdeniya [University 3.0. Problems of Legal Support]. Kazan, Buk, 2017. 100 p. (In Russian)

 

For citation: Sushkova O.V. Legal features of stimulation of innovations in enterprise. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2018, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 442–453. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.