Social purpose of criminal law

E.V. Medvedev

Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, 432007 Russia

E-mail: oxymoron@rambler.ru

Received May 6, 2022

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.4.122-133

For citation: Medvedev E.V. Social purpose of criminal law. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2022, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 122–133. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.4.122-133. (In Russian)

Abstract

This article discusses the results of an analysis of the social purpose of criminal law, which is perceived as a separate branch of law. The most common doctrinal views on the social origins of criminal law as a social regulator were considered. Based on the results obtained, a new vision of the problem was proposed and the concepts under study were redefined. The protection of social values by criminal law was emphasized as the background for strong public relations. The mechanism of infringing the values and their bearers (physical and legal entities, the entire society and state), as well as the social ties in various spheres of human activities arising from these values, were covered. From this perspective, the causes of many controversies in the theory of the general part of criminal law can be explained. Additionally, the existing disputes over some of its problematic issues can be settled, such as those in the theory of the object of crime in order to reconcile the upholders of the view that any object of crime concerns social relations with the supporters of the concept of interest (good) and alternative points of view. The above-specified approach to unfolding the social purpose of criminal law enables further comprehensive studying of its functional potential because it demonstrates more clearly that the origins and functions of law make it a social regulator with regard to changes that it should and can induce in the objective reality.

Keywords: criminal law, social purpose of criminal law, functional potential of criminal law, social values, main directions of criminal law impact

References

  1. Vlasov I.S., Golovanova N.A., Gravina A.A. et al. Kriminalizatsiya i dekriminalizatsiya kak formy preobrazovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva [Criminalization and Decriminalization as Forms of Transformation of Criminal Legislation]. Kashepov V.P. (Ed.). Moscow, IZiSP, KONTRAKT, 2018. 280 p. (In Russian)
  2. Razgil’diev B.T. The objectives of Russian criminal law and their fulfillment. Extended Abstract of Doct. Law Diss. Moscow, 1994. 36 p. (In Russian)
  3. Tsepelev V.F. Criminal and political conditionality of criminal legislation. Ugolovnoe Pravo, 2017, no. 4, pp. 124–127. (In Russian)
  4. Naumov A.V. Rossiiskoe ugolovnoe pravo [Russian Criminal Law]. Vol. 1: General part. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer, 2011. 768 p. (In Russian)
  5. Brilliantov A.V., Dolzhenkova G.D., Zhevlakov E.N. et al. Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postateinyi) [Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (Article by Article)]. Brilliantov A.V. (Ed.). Vol. 1. Moscow, Prospekt, 2015. 792 p. (In Russian)
  6. Lanovaya G.M. The origins of criminal law and its current objectives: The problem of compatibility. Sovremennoe Pravo, 2013, no. 11, pp. 19–23. (In Russian)
  7. Lesnievski-Kostareva T.A. Differentsiatsiya ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti. Teoriya i zakonodatel’naya praktika [Differentiation of Criminal Liability. Theory and Legislative Practice]. Moscow, Norma, 2000. 432 p. (In Russian)
  8. Ioffe O.S., Shargorodskii M.D. Voprosy teorii prava [Problems of Law Theory]. Moscow, Yur. Lit., 1961. 381 p. (In Russian)
  9. Stal’gevich A.K. On the definition of law. Sovetskoe Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 1948, no. 7, p. 50. (In Russian)
  10. Piontkovskii A.A. Some problems of the general theory of law and state. Sovetskoe Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 1956, no. 1, pp. 17–20. (In Russian)
  11. Farber I.E. O sushchnosti prava [On the Essence of Law]. Saratov, Izd. Sarat. Univ., 1959. 76 p. (In Russian)
  12. Golunskii S.A., Strogovich M.S. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of Law and State]. Moscow, Yurizdat, 1940. 304 p. (In Russian)
  13. Reisdorf K. Grundlegung der Rechtswissenschaft. Berlin, Bonn, Ferd. Dümmler, 1930. 139 S. (In German)
  14. Tugarinov V.P. O tsennostyakh zhizni i kul’tury [On the Values of Life and Culture]. Leningrad, Izd. LGU, 1960. 156 p. (In Russian)
  15. Spiridonova V.A. The problem of values in sociology (historical and theoretical aspects). Cand. Sociol. Diss. St. Petersburg, 2004. 150 p. (In Russian)
  16. Votintseva N.N. The specifics of values and value-based consciousness in a transforming society. Cand. Philos. Diss. Perm, 2009. 187 p. (In Russian)
  17. Artemov V.Yu., Bevelikova N.M., Gazizova R.G. et al. Sravnitel’noe pravovedenie: Natsional’nye pravovye sistemy [Comparative Jurisprudence: National Legal Systems]. Lafitskii V.I. (Ed.). Vol. 3: Legal systems of Asia. Moscow, IZiSP, KONTRAKT, 2013. 704 p. (In Russian)
  18. Kvashis V.E. Smertnaya kazn’. Mirovye tendentsii, problemy i perspektivy [Death Penalty. Global Trends, Problems, and Prospects]. Moscow, Yurait, 2008. 800 p. (In Russian)
  19. Kudryavtsev V.N., Eminov V.E. Criminology and problems of decriminalization. Zhurnal Rossiiskogo Prava, 2005, no. 4, pp. 103–107. (In Russian)
  20. Naumov A.V. E.I. Kairzhanov’s concept of the object of crime as the most important achievement of the national school of criminal law of Kazakhstan during the Soviet and post-Soviet periods. In: Sovremennye problemy ugolovnoi politiki. [Modern Problems of Criminal Policy]. Yekaterinburg, Ural, Gos. Yurid. Univ., 2019, pp. 71–78. (In Russian)
  21. Kairzhanov E.I. Ob”ekt prestupleniya  – interesy sotsial’nykh sub”ektov [The Object of Crime – the Interests of Social Subjects]. Almaty, Ekonomika, 2008. 211 p. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.