The distribution of letter doublets in the Apostolus Christinopolitanus of the 12th century

A.A. Toksubaeva

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia

E-mail: aabakshaeva42@gmail.com

Received August 2, 2022

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.5.7-21

For citation: Toksubaeva A.A. The distribution of letter doublets in the Apostolus Christinopolitanus of the 12th century. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2022, vol. 164, no. 5, pp. 7–21. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.5.7-21. (In Russian)

Abstract

This article considers the graphic and orthographic features of the Apostolus Christinopolitanus dated to the 12th century. The manuscript is of Galician-Volynian origin. It contains a liturgical text and is distinguished by an archaic style and numerous examples of East Slavic spellings. Hence, its spelling system, especially the letter doublets and their allographs, is of particular interest. Here, the graphic and orthographic features of the Apostolus Christinopolitanus were studied on the basis of the color photocopies of the Lviv and Kyiv parts, as well as on its electronic machine-readable edition. The analysis was carried out using corpus management software tools and information on the distribution of certain graphemes and their allographs during the 11th and 12th centuries. It was revealed that the scribe adhered to a clear writing sequence characterized by strict differentiation of variant markings in each of the considered doublets, but he used all variants of spelling known to him, which is evidence of his professionalism. The strict differentiation of the spelling variants in each of the doublet links is a characteristic feature of the Apostolus Christinopolitanus.

Keywords: history of writing, Old Russian language, Apostolus Christinopolitanus, orthographic norm, graphic doublets

Figure Captions

Fig. 1. Distribution of the allographs е, є at the beginning of the word; е – blue curve, є – red curve.

References

  1. Zholobov O.F. The Old Slavic copies of the Paraenesis by Ephrem the Syrian: New findings and new aspects of research. Pis’mennost’, literatura i fol’klor slavyanskikh narodov. XIV Mezhdunar. s”ezd slavistov. Dokl. ros. delegatsii [Writing, Literature, and Folklore of Slavic Peoples. Proc. XIV Int. Congr. of Slavists. Reports of the Russian Delegation]. Moscow, Indrik, 2008, pp. 51–75. (In Russian)
  2. Zholobov O.F. Written heritage and computer technology. Sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii i pis’mennoe nasledie: ot drevnikh tekstov k elektronnym bibliotekam: Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Modern Information Technology and Written Heritage: From Ancient Texts to Electronic Libraries: Proc. Int. Sci. Conf.]. Kazan, Izd. Kazan. Univ., 2008, pp. 111–113. (In Russian)
  3. Krivko R.N. Ocherki yazyka drevnikh tserkovnoslavyanskikh rukopisei [Essays on the Language of Old Church Slavonic Manuscripts]. Moscow, Indrik, 2015. 445 p. (In Russian)
  4. Krys’ko V.B., Mol’kov G.A. Vostochnoslavyanskie rukopisi XI – nachala XIII v.: Lingvisticheskie ocherki [East Slavic Manuscripts of the 11th–Early 13th Centuries: Essays in Linguistics]. Moscow, Azbukovnik, 2020. 464 p. (In Russian)
  5. Mol’kov G.A. A linguistic and paleographic study of the Old Russian manuscript Miljatino Gospel (National Library of Russia, F.p.I.7). Cand. Philol. Diss. St. Petersburg, 2014. 267 p. (In Russian)
  6. Moskaleva L.A. The graphic-orthographic and phonetical features of the Paraenesis by Ephrem the Syrian according to the manuscript from the Russian National Library, Pogod. 71a c. 1289. Cand. Philol. Diss. Kazan, 2006. 279 p. (In Russian)
  7. Paimina O.S. The linguistic features of the Trinity Miscellany of the 12th–13th centuries. Cand. Philol. Diss. Kazan, 2012. 326 p. (In Russian)
  8. Ponomarenko T.O. The linguistic features of the Life of Nifont Konstantsky of 1222. Cand. Philol. Diss. Kazan, 2009. 245 p. (In Russian)
  9. Moskaleva L.A. Graphic-orthographic variants of the Paraenesis by Ephrem the Syrian according to the manuscript from the Russian National Library, pogod. 71a c. 1289. Vestnik Kazanskogo Tekhnologicheskogo Universiteta, 2006, no. 5, pp. 129–134. (In Russian)
  10. Osipov B.I. Istoriya russkoi orfografii i punktuatsii [A History of Russian Orthography and Punctuation]. Novosibirsk, Izd. Novosib. Univ., 1992. 253 p. (In Russian)
  11. Ryabova E.V. The functioning of letter doublets in the Novgorod Gospels of the 12th–13th centuries. Cand. Philol. Diss. Izhevsk, 2003. 366 p. (In Russian)
  12. Cherepnin L.V. Russkaya paleografiya [Russian Paleography]. Moscow, Izd. Polit. Lit., 1956. 616 p. (In Russian)
  13. Zaliznyak A.A. On the concept of grapheme. In: “Russkoe imennoe slovoizmenenie” s prilozheniem izbrannykh rabot po sovremennomu russkomu yazyku i obshchemu yazykoznaniyu [“Russian Nominal Inflection” with Additional Selected Works on the Contemporary Russian Language and General Linguistics]. Moscow, Yazyki Slavyan. Kul’t., 2002, pp. 559–576. (In Russian)
  14. Zherebilo T.V. Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov [Dictionary of Linguistic Terms]. Nazran, Piligrim, 2005. 376 p. (In Russian)
  15. Levochkin I.V. Osnovy russkoi paleografii [Fundamentals of Russian Paleography]. Moscow, Krug”, 2003. 176 p. (In Russian)
  16. Durnovo N.N. Izbrannye raboty po istorii russkogo yazyka [Selected Writings on the History of the Russian Language]. Moscow, Yazyki Slavyan. Kul’t., 2000. 780 p. (In Russian)
  17. Kolesov V.V. Istoricheskaya fonetika russkogo yazyka [Historical Phonetics of the Russian Language]. Moscow, Vyssh. Shk., 1980. 215 p. (In Russian)
  18. Uspenskii B.A. Istoriya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka (XI – XVII vv.) [History of the Russian Literary Language (11th–17th Centuries)]. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 2002. 558 p. (In Russian)
  19. Zhivov V.M. Vostochnoslavyanskoe pravopisanie XI – XIII veka [East Slavic Spelling of the 11th–13th Centuries]. Moscow, Yazyki Slavyan. Kul’t., 2006. 312 p. (In Russian)
  20. Shakhmatov A.A. Ocherk drevneishego perioda istorii russkogo yazyka [An Essay on the Earliest Period in the History of the Russian Language]. Petrograd, Tip. Imp. Akad. Nauk, 1915. L, 367, [6] p. (Encyclopedia of Slavic Philology, no. 11.1) (In Russian)
  21. Gal’chenko M.G. Triodion by Moses Kiyanin (paleographic and graphic-orthographic analysis). In: Knizhnaya kul’tura. Knigopisanie. Nadpisi na ikonakh Drevney Rusi. Izbrannyye raboty [Book Culture. Book Writing. Inscriptions on Icons of Ancient Rus’. Selected Writings]. Moscow, UNIK, ALETEIYa, 2001, pp. 28–45. (In Russian)
  22. Barankova G.S. On some graphic-orthographic and linguistic features of the Novgorod Nomocanon of 1280. In: Slavyanskoe i balkanskoe yazykoznanie: Paleoslavistika [Slavic and Balkan Linguistics: Paleoslavic Studies]. Moscow, ISl Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2017, pp. 7–26. (In Russian)
  23. Zholobov O.F. From Proto-Slavic to Old Church Slavonic: On the perfective imperfect. Voprosy Yazykoznaniya, 2016, no. 3, pp. 64–80. (In Russian)
  24. Zholobov O.F. Proto-Slavic heritage and Old Russian preterites. Slavyanskoe yazykoznanie: XVI Mezhdunar. s”ezd slavistov. Dokl. ros. delegatsii [Slavic Linguistics. Proc. XVI Int. Congr. of Slavists. Reports of the Russian Delegation]. Moscow, ISl Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2018, pp. 145–170. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.