History of science in a harmonic style [Review: Smagina G.I. 'Learning Science Historically…': Russian History of Science in the Early Decades of the 20th Century. St. Petersburg, Rostok, 2020. (In Russian)]

V.P. Korzun

Dostoevsky Omsk State University, Omsk, 644077 Russia

E-mail: korzunv@mail.ru

Received February 12, 2022

 

BOOK REVIEW

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.3.243-250

For citation: Korzun V.P. History of science in a harmonic style [Review: Smagina G.I. “Lear­ning Science Historically…”: Russian History of Science in the Early Decades of the 20th Century. St. Petersburg, Rostok, 2020. (In Russian)]. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2022, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 243–250. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.3.243-250. (In Russian)

Abstract

This review discusses the structure and key points of G.I. Smagina’s book devoted to the institutional and content development of the Russian history of science as a discipline during the early decades of the 20th century. The major focus falls on the process of institutionalization of the history of science in Russia that took more than 15 years – starting from the establishment of the Commission for the Publication of the Collection of Articles “Russian Science” in December 1916 until the foundation of the Institute of Science and Technology of the USSR Academy of Sciences in February 1932. The monograph consists of five chapters and appendices, which make up almost a third of the entire work. The genre of the reviewed book is defined as a documentary monograph. The institutional and anthropological aspects of the study are emphasized. The researchers who were involved in the shaping of a new discipline are identified. The author believes that over 400 people participated, in one way or another, in the studies within the scope of the history of science. Brief intellectual biographies of both the leaders of the two commissions (A.S. Lappo-Danilevsky, V.I. Vernadsky, N.I. Bukharin) and ordinary participants/creators of the historical and scientific process are presented. Plots related to the practices of popularization of science within the framework of academic structures are distinguished as innovative issues. Based on G.I. Smagina’s reasoning, two levels of popularization are singled out: within the corporation and outside it (in the space of mass culture). A hypothesis about the change in the conceptual settings during the development of the history of science as a discipline in the first third of the 20th century – from a humanitarian interpretation of the history of science to a socially oriented concept – with the subsequent institutionalization of the process is introduced.

Keywords: history of science, Commission for the Publication of the Collection of Articles “Russian Science”, Commission for the History of Knowledge, Institute of Science and Technology of the USSR Academy of Sciences, institutionalization, popularization of science

References

  1. Popova T.N. Istoriografiya, bioistoriopisanie, bitsillievedenie: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika [Historiography, Biohistorical Writing, Bitsilli Studies: Theory, Methodology, Practice]. Odessa, Bondarenko M.A., 2022. 472 p. (In Russian)
  2. Yurevich A.V. The “tower” of science studies, or again on the subject and structure of science studies. In: Allakhverdyan A.G., Semenova N.N., Yurevich A.V. (Eds.) Naukovedenie i novye tendentsii v razvitii rossiiskoi nauki [Science Studies and New Trends in the Development of Russian Science]. Moscow, Logos, 2005, pp. 26–42. (In Russian)
  3. Nora P. The problematics of memory sites. In: Nora P., Ozouf M., de Puymège G., Winock M. Frantsiya-pamyat’ [France-Memory]. St. Petersburg, Izd. S.-Peterb. Univ., 1999, pp. 17–50. (In Russian)
  4. Ilizarov S.S. The birth of the profession of a “science historian”: Russia. First half of the 20th century. In: Shipovalova L.V., Kasavin I.T. Nauka kak obshchestvennoe blago: Sb. nauch. st. [Science as a Public Good: A Collection of Articles]. Vol. 6. Moscow, Russ. O-vo. Ist. Filos. Nauki, 2020, pp. 106–109. (In Russian)
  5. Korzun V.P., Kolevatov D.M. The collection of articles “Russian Science”: On the reasons for the failure of the great conception. In: Grishina N.V., Andreeva T.A. (Eds.) Mir istorika i prostranstvo istorii: Sb. st. k yubileyu professora N.N. Alevras [The World of the Historian and the Space of History: A Collection of Article Marking the Birthday Anniversary of Professor N.N. Lalevras]. Chelyabinsk, Entsiklopediya, 2018, pp. 118–132. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.