E.V. Anokhina

Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, 308015 Russia

E-mail: Anokhina-ElizavetaV@yandex.ru

Received January 10, 2022

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.3.122-133

For citation: Anokhina E.V. Women’s influence on the private life of society in Late Antiquity according to Saint Augustine. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2022, vol. 164, no. 3, pp. 122–133. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2022.3.122-133. (In Russian)

Abstract

This article considers the forms of women’s influence in Saint Augustine’s “Confessiones” that are realized through the sphere of private life. The analysis of the historical context revealed that Late Antiquity, characterized by continuity and transitivity, was marked by a coexistence of the ancient and Christian traditions. Interestingly, it was natural that these traditions became intertwined in the mindset of a person. The gender-marked expressions used by Saint Augustine were studied, and the conclusion was made that he appears to more stick to the ancient ideas about femininity/masculinity, including the belief that women, who were perceived as physically and emotionally imperfect, must be placed under the control of men, i.e., they should obey stronger persons. Simultaneously, the dualism of Saint Augustine’s thinking was noted: he was a striking representative of Late Antiquity, thus he placed religion above gender and the Christian wife above her pagan husband. The main types of influence exerted by women on men were highlighted in accordance with the established instruments of such influence: emotional impact and sexual attachment. From the results obtained, it was summed up that the views of Saint Augustine on women’s influence correlate with his gender-related ideas, as well as with his moral principles.

Keywords: gender, femininity, influence, marriage, Late Antiquity, Saint Augustine

Acknowledgments. The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 22-28-00284).

References

  1. Cremona C. Avgustin iz Gippona. Razum i vera [Augustine of Hippo. Reason and Faith]. Moscow, Docheri sv. Pavla, 1995. 305 p. (In Russian)
  2. Chadwick H. Augustine of Hippo: A Life. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, 2009. 208 p.
  3. Erokhina Yu.A. Augustine’s historical views. Extended Abstract of Cand. Hist. Diss. Kazan, 2000. 25 p. (In Russian)
  4. Epifanova T.V. Man, society, and state in Saint Augustine’s historical and religious doctrine. Cand. Hist. Diss. Vladimir, 2002. 221 p. (In Russian)
  5. Brown P. Augustine of Hippo. New York, Dorset Press, 1986. 470 p.
  6. Salzman M.R. The Making of a Christian Aristocracy. Social and Religious Change in the Western Roman Empire. Cambridge, USA; London, Harvard Univ. Press, 2004. 369 p.
  7. Lapshin I.E. Marriage aesthetics in Saint Augustine’s doctrine. Servis v Rossii i Za Rubezhom, 2013, no. 4, pp. 66–72. (In Russian)
  8. Arjava A. Women and Law in Late Antiquity. Oxford, Slarendon Press, 1996. 304 p.
  9. Sissa G. The sexual philosophies of Plato and Aristotle. In: Istoriya zhenshchin na Zapade: ot drevnikh bogin’ do khristianskikh svyatykh [A History of Women in the West: From Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints]. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, 2005, pp. 71–108. (In Russian)
  10. Bolgov N.N. Pozdnyaya Antichnost’: istoriya i kul’tura [Late Antiquity: History and Culture]. Belgorod, Izd. Belgorod. Gos. Univ., 2009. 88 p. (In Russian)
  11. Clark M.T. Augustine. New York, Georgetown Univ. Press, 1994. 136 p.
  12. Litovchenko E.V. The classical tradition in the mindset of the Late Antiquity intellectuals of the Latin West. Kondakovskie chteniya II. Problemy kul’turno-istoricheskikh epokh: Materialy 2-i Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Kondakov Lectures II. Problems of Cultural and Historical Eras: Proc. 2nd Int. Sci. Conf.]. Belgorod, Belgorod. Gos. Univ., 2008, pp. 109–112. (In Russian)
  13. Litovchenko E.V. The classical and Christian tradition in the mentality of Late Antiquity’s intellectuals. Istoriya, 2012, vol. 3, no. 1. Available at: https://history.jes.su/s207987840000292-0-2/. (In Russian)
  14. Litovchenko E.V. The classical tradition in the writings of Late Roman intellectuals: Late 4th–early 6th centuries. Extended Abstract of Cand. Hist. Diss. Tula, 2007. 22 p. (In Russian)
  15. Meyendorff J. Vvedenie v svyatootecheskoe bogoslovie [Introduction to Patristic Theology]. Minsk, Luchi Sofii, 2007. 360 p. (In Russian)
  16. Evtukhov I.O. The concept of man in the Late Antiquity: (West of the Roman Empire, 5th century AD). Extended Abstract of Cand. Hist. Diss. Minsk, 1991. 19 p. (In Russian)
  17. Ryabova T.B. Gender stereotypes and gender stereotyping: Methodological approaches. Zhenshchina v Rossiiskom Obshchestve. Ivanovo, Ivanov. Gos. Univ., 2001, nos. 3–4, pp. 3–12. (In Russian)
  18. Kipervar E.A., Sevelova M.A. Prerequisites for the emergence of ideas about gender in ancient philosophy. Omskii Nauchnyi Vestnik, 2012, no. 3, pp. 82–84. (In Russian)
  19. Korpachev P.A. Christian ascetic tradition prior to the emergence of monasticism. Nauchno-Tekhni­cheskie Vedomosti SPbGPU. Gumanitarnye i Obshchestvennye Nauki, 2017, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 126–133. (In Russian)
  20. Cooper K. Insinuations of womanly influence: An aspect of the Christianization of the Roman aristocracy. Journal of Roman Studies, 1992, vol. 82, pp. 150–164. doi: 10.2307/301289.
  21. Brown P. The Body and Society: Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York, Columbia Univ. Press, 1988. 478 p.
  22. Vasil’ev V.A., Lobov D.V. Augustine on good, evil, and virtue. Sotsial’no-Gumanitarnye Znaniya, 2008, no. 5, pp. 255–266. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.