Reception of the Ukrainophilic ideas by Russian periodicals during the first half of the 1860s: Democratic and protective approaches

E.R. Rachev

Perm State University, Perm, 614990 Russia

E-mail: evgeny.rachev@gmail.com

Received August 23, 2021

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.6.48-60

For citation: Rachev E.R. Reception of the Ukrainophilic ideas by Russian periodicals    during the first half of the 1860s: Democratic and protective approaches. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2021, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 48–60. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.6.48-60. (In Russian)

Abstract

The article discusses how Russian periodicals responded to the Ukrainophilic views that were widely supported by Russian society during the early 1860s. The writers from the bilingual magazine “Osnova” (‘Basis’), particularly N.I. Kostomarov and P.A. Kulish, actively contributed to the achievements of the first generation of Ukrainophiles. The latter elaborated and presented their program aimed to preserve the Little Russia culture. The results of the analysis of the periodical sources show that the printed media of the period under study had polarized views on the national identity of Little Russia and divided into two factions: the democratic and protective ones. The democratic approach was led by the magazines “Sovremennik” (‘The Contemporary’) and “Otechestvennye Zapiski” (‘Annals of the Fatherland’) that considered the new provincial movement as the beginning of Narodism. The key supporters of the protective approach were the newspaper “Den’” (‘The Day’) and the magazine “Russkii Vestnik” (‘The Russian Bulletin’) that criticized the Ukrainian legacy adherents for separating the Russian nationalities. The stages of the evolution of the Russian periodicals’ attitude to Ukrainophiles were singled out. The main factors that influenced it were revealed. The consequences of the short-term prevalence of the Ukrainian “selfhood” ideology among publicists of the Russian Empire and its influence on the subsequent development of the Ukrainophilia movement were summarized.

Keywords: Nikolay Ivanovich Kostomarov, Panteleimon Alexandrovich Kulish, Ukrainophilia, Slavophilia, Little Russia’s language, “Osnova” magazine, nation building, “Polish issue”, conservative and democratic periodicals

References

  1. Miller A.I. Ukrainskii vopros v politike vlastei i russkom obshchestvennom mnenii (vtoraya polovina XIX veka) [The Ukrainian Issue in the Government Policy and Russian Public Opinion (The Second Half of the 19th Century)]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiya, 2000. 260 p. (In Russian)
  2. Artamonova L.M. Participation of provincial public and administration in the all-Russian movement for opening Sunday schools (1859–1862): From the history of civil society in Russia. Vestnik Samarskogo Universiteta. Istoriya, Pedagogika, Filologiya, 2016, no. 4, pp. 9–17. (In Russian)
  3. Teslya A.A. Ukrainophilia: Periods and major stages of development (1840–1880s). In: Russofil: Russkaya filosofiya, istoriya i kul’tura: sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Russophile: Russian Philosophy, History, and Culture: A Collection of Scientific Works]. Dement’ev I.O. (Ed.). Kaliningrad, Smartbuks. 2017, no. 1, pp. 73–112. (In Russian)
  4. Aksenova E.P. The magazine “Osnova”: A view on the Slavism. In: Slavyanskii al’manakh [Slavic Almanac], 1999, pp. 153–163. (In Russian)
  5. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma [Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism]. Moscow, Kuchkovo Pole, 2016. 416 p. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.