I.V. Narskii a*, N.V. Narskaya b**

aPerm State National Research University, Perm, 614990 Russia

bBranch of the Military Training and Research Center of the Air Force “Military Air Force Academy”, Chelyabinsk, 454015 Russia

E-mail: *inarsky@mail.ru, **bredihina_natalya@mail.ru

Received October 26, 2021

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.6.16-30

For citation: Narskii I.V., Narskaya N.V. A human at the flea market, or the private dimension of the past. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2021, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 16–30. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.6.16-30. (In Russian) 

Abstract

This article focuses on the problem of studying the flea market as a reflection of society and as a place of alternative, non-professional, and unofficial reappraisal of the past. The reasons for the low interest of historians in the phenomenon of the flea market, which, by definition, should be part of historical studies about everyday habits, collective memory, and Public History, were identified. The historiographical, source-related, and methodological milestones for studying the flea market were outlined. The high potential of special historical studies of the flea market was substantiated. The current lack of Public History tools to perform such studies was noted. It was suggested that historians should analyze the flea market through a specific lens, i.e., using the concept of Private History, still being elaborated and validated. Private History could address various aspects and forms of the indirect treatment of the past, such as close family circle, as well as semi-legal or illegal actions at flea and antiques markets, among collectors, searchers, and tomb raiders. Of no less interest are the changes that occur when the private discourse of the past turns into the public one.

Keywords: flea market, “private society”, Public History, Private History, Russia, Germany, 20th century

References

  1. Brednikova O., Kutaf’eva Z. Old thing as a character of flea markets. Neprikosnovennyi Zapas, 2004, no. 34, pp. 91–96. (In Russian)
  2. Voronkova L.V., Sotnikova E.V., Pachenkov O.V. “This is not a market”: A game with formats. Praktiki i Interpretatsii: Zhurnal Filologicheskikh, Obrazovatel’nykh i Kul’turnykh Issledovanii, 2016, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 142–184. (In Russian)
  3. Pachenkov O.V., Voronkova L.V. Flea market as an “urban scene”. In: Mikrourbanizm. Gorod v detalyakh [Microurbanism. The City in Detail]. Мoscow, NLO, 2014, pp. 132–169. (In Russian)
  4. Fischer V. Nostalgie, Geschichte und Kultur als Trödelmarkt. Luzern, Frankfurt am Main, C.J. Bucher, 1980. 303 S. (In German)
  5. Anderegg U. Flohmarkt. Spaziergängen durch den Alltag. Zürich, Schweiz. Verlagshaus, 1981. 143 S. (In German)
  6. Jüngst P. Zu den Einkaufs-, Freizeit- und Kommunikationsstrukturen auf öffentlichen und privaten Flohmärkten – vorläufige Ergebnisse anhand zweier Fallstudien in Kassel und Marburg. Urbs et Regio, 1984, N. 32, S. 97–120. (In German)
  7. Winter G. Trödelmärkte: Eine empirische Untersuchung zur sozialen und ökonomischen Struktur einer Institution privater Öffentlichkeit. Göttingen, Cuvillier, 1996. 267 S. (In German)
  8. Damsar. “Fleamarket” in a German Town: A Study in Economic Sociology. Bielefeld, Cuvillier, 1998. 183 p.
  9. Ackermann F., Ackermann J., Littke A., Nisser J., Thomann J. Applied history, or the public dimension of the past. Neprikosnovennyi Zapas, 2012, no. 3. Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/nz/ 2012/3/prikladnaya-istoriya-ili-publichnoe-izmerenie-proshlogo.html. (In Russian)
  10. Vse v proshlom: Teoriya i praktika publichnoi istorii [All in the Past: Theory and Practice of Public History]. Zavadsky A., Dubina V. (Eds.). Moscow, Novoe Izd., 2021. 448 p. (In Russian)
  11. De Groot J. Consuming History. Historians and Heritage in Contemporary Popular Culture. London, Routledge, 2016. 332 p.
  12. Lebina N.B. Entsiklopediya banal’nostei: Sovetskaya Povsednevnost’: Kontury, simvoly, znaki [Encyclopedia of Banalities: Soviet Everyday Life: Contours, Symbols, Signs]. St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin, 2006. 444 p. (In Russian)
  13. Osokina E.A. Za fasadom “stalinskogo izobiliya”: Raspredelenie i rynok v snabzhenii naseleniya v gody industrializatsii. 1927–1941. [Behind the Facade of Stalinist Abundance: Distribution and Market in the Supply of Population in the Years of Industrialization. 1927–1941]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2008. 351 p. (In Russian)
  14. Schlögel K. Das sowjetische Jahrhundert: Archäologie einer untergangenen Welt. München, Verlag C.H. Beck, 2017. 912 S. (In German)
  15. Latour B. On interobjectivity. Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie, 2007, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 79–96. (In Russian)
  16. Jenss H. Sixties Dress Only! Mode und Konsum in der Retro-Szene der Mods. Frankfurt am Main, New York, Campus Verlag, 2007. 367 p. (In German)
  17. Jenss H. Fashioning Memory. Vintage Style and Youth Culture. London; New York, Bloomsbury Acad., 2015. 173 p.
  18. Mintz S. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York, Viking Penguin, 1985. 274 p.
  19. McGregor N. Istoriya mira v 100 predmetakh [History of the World in 100 Subjects]. Moscow, Eksmo, 2012. 800 p. (In Russian)
  20. Ginzburg C. Derevyannye glaza: Desyat’ statei o distantsii [Wooden Eyes: Ten Reflections on Distance]. Moscow, Nov. Izd., 2021. 448 p. (In Russian)
  21. Osokina E.A. Zoloto dlya industrializatsii: Torgsin [Gold for Industrialization: Torgsin]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2009. 592 p. (In Russian)
  22. Osokina E.A. Nebesnaya golubizna angel’skikh odezhd. Sud’ba proizvedenii drevnerusskoi zhivopisi. 1920–1930-e gody [The Heavenly Blue Color of Angelic Robes. The Fate of Old Russian Paintings. 1920s–1930s]. Moscow, NLO, 2018. 664 p. (In Russian)
  23. Schlögel K. Der Duft der Imperien. Chanel No 5 und Rotes Moskau. München, C. Hanser, 2020. 221 S. (In German)
  24. Assman A. Novoe nedovol’stvo memorial’noi kul’turoi [The New Discontent with Memorial Culture]. Moscow, NLO, 2016. 232 p. (In Russian)
  25. Assman A. Zabvenie istorii – oderzhitost’ istoriei [Forgetting History – an Obsession with History]. Moscow, NLO, 2019. 552 p. (In Russian)
  26. Assmann J. Kul’turnaya pamyat’: Pis’mo, pamyat’ o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost’ v vysokikh kul’turakh drevnosti [Cultural Memory: Writing, Memory of the Past, and Political Identity in the High Cultures of Antiquity]. Moscow, Yazyki Slav. Kul’t., 2004. 368 p. (In Russian)
  27. Lowenthal D. Proshloe – chuzhaya strana [The Past Is a Foreign Country]. St. Petersburg, Vladimir Dal’, Russ. Ostrov, 2004. 622 p. (In Russian)
  28. Ricoeur P. Pamyat’, istoriya, zabvenie [Memory, History, Oblivion]. Moscow, Izd. Gumanit. Lit., 2004. 728 p. (In Russian)
  29. Halbwachs M. Sotsial’nye ramki pamyati [Social Frameworks of Memory]. Moscow, Nov. Izd., 2007. 348 p. (In Russian)
  30. Koposov N. Pamyat’ strogogo rezhima: Istoriya i politika v Rossii [High Security Memory. History and Politics in Russia]. Moscow, NLO, 2011. 316 p. (In Russian)
  31. Epple N. Neudobnoe proshloe: pamyat’ o gosudarstvennykh prestupleniyakh v Rossii i drugikh stranakh [An Inconvenient Past: Memory of the State Crimes in Russia and Other Countries]. Moscow, NLO, 2020. 576 p. (In Russian)
  32. Ankersmith F. Politicheskaya reprezentatsiya [Political Representation]. Moscow, VShE, 2012. 288 p. (In Russian)
  33. Ricoeur P. Vremya i rasskaz [Time and Narrative]. Мoscow, St. Petersburg, Univ. Kniga, 2000. Vol. 1, 313 p. Vol. 2, 224 p. (In Russian)
  34. White H. Metaistoriya: istoricheskoe voobrazhenie v Evrope XIX veka [Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in 19th-Century Europe]. Yekaterinburg, Izd. Ural. Univ., 2002. 528 p. (In Russian)
  35. Burke P. Eyewitnessing: The Uses of Images as Historical Evidence. London, Reaktion Books, 2001. 224 p.
  36. Roeck B. Das historische Auge. Kunstwerke als Zeugen ihrer Zeit. Von der Renaissance zur Revolution. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2004. 375 S. (In German)
  37. Narskii I.V. The anthropologization of authorship: An Invitation to lyrical historiography. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2012, no. 115, pp. 56–70. (In Russian)
  38. Gadamer H.-G. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Berlin, J.C.B. Mohr, 1993. 533 S. (In German)
  39. Ginzburg C. Clues: Roots of an evidential paradigm. In: Ginzburg C. Mify – emblemy – primety: morfologiya i istoriya [Myths – Emblems – Clues: Morphology and History]. Moscow, Nov. Izd., 2004, pp. 189–241. (In Russian)
  40. Heller H. Über den Umgang mit Tradition auf Trödelmärkten. In: Otto Koenig 70 Jahre. Kulturwissenschaftliche Beitrage zur Verhaltensforschung. Matreier Gespräche. Wien, Heidelberg, Wirtschaftsverlag Ueberreuter, 1984, S. 199–204. (In German)
  41. Narskii I.V. Fotokartochka na pamyat’: Semeinye istorii, fotograficheskie poslaniya i sovetskoe detstvo (Avtobio-istorio-graficheskii roman) [Memorable Photo: Family Stories, Photographic Messages and Soviet Childhood (Autobio-Historical-Graphic Novel)]. Chelyabinsk, OOO “Entsiklopediya”, 2008. 516 p. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.