Perception of freedom in the Chinese linguistic worldview: Tradition and modernity

K.M. Naumova

St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, 199034 Russia

E-mail: ksenianaumova888@gmail.com

Received April 4, 2021

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.4-5.162-174

For citation: Naumova K.M. Perception of freedom in the Chinese linguistic worldview: Tradition and modernity. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2021, vol. 163, no. 4–5, pp. 162–174. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.4-5.162-174. (In Russian)

Abstract

This article examines the changes in the linguistic and cultural concepts of freedom (自由 zìyóu) in the Chinese linguistic worldview, which have occurred as a result of extralinguistic and socio-cultural transformations brought by globalization processes between the 20th and 21st centuries. The starting point of the research is the traditional ideas about freedom, rooted in Confucianism and the Taoist worldview, according to which disobedience and self-will of the individual can lead society and the country to chaos, so freedom should be limited by norms and prohibitions. By studying empirical data with the help of definitional, quantitative, interpretative, and contextual analysis, a total of more than 1000 phrases with the lexical unit of interest were gathered. Thus, the idea of freedom in modern Chinese society was described in great detail. The results obtained were accompanied with the data of the quantitative analysis of the most frequent collocations based on the materials of the Balanced Corpus of Modern Chinese in Peking University. The article provides many examples that prove that the lexeme 自由 zìyóu occurs in phrases that describe numerous and diverse spheres of human activity. The conclusion was made that it has expanded its combinability capabilities as a result of the semantic shift that took place with the penetration of liberal ideas into China from the West. The research is of great importance and benefit for Chinese philologists, as well as for anyone interested in studying globalization processes and their impact on the traditional cultures of the East.

Keywords: linguistic worldview, Chinese language, freedom, globalization, corpus linguistics, cultural linguistics, linguistic change, collocations, tradition, China

References

  1. Robert A. Carleo III. Confucian freedom: Assessing the debate. Asian Philosophy, 2021, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 211–228. doi: 10.1080/09552367.2021.1899439.
  2. Li Xiatong. The critical construction and contemporary development of the Marxist view of freedom. New Era. New Ideas, 2021, no. 3, pp. 53–60. doi: 10.19810/jissn.1007-4767.2021.03.008. (In Chinese)
  3. Ho Iat Seng. On moral freedom. Master’s Thesis. Hunan, Hunan Norm. Univ., 2020. 60 p. (In Chinese)
  4. Suary Shirley Lin. Analyzing the relationship between identity and democratization in Taiwan and Hong Kong in the shadow of China. Available at: https://theasanforum.org/.
  5. Fuller G.E., Starr S.F. The Xinjiang Problem. New York, London, Cent. Asia-Caucasus Inst., Paul H. Nitze Sch. Adv. Int. Stud., Johns Hopkins Univ., 2003. 87 p.
  6. Chen D.-S. Taiwan’s social changes in the patterns of social solidarity in the 20th century. The China Quarterly, 2001, vol. 165, pp. 61–82. doi: 10.1017/S0009443901000043.
  7. Chang Bi-yu. From Taiwanisation to de-sinification. China Perspectives, 2004, vol. 56, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.438.
  8. Au A. Collective identity, organization, and public reaction in protests: A qualitative case study of Hong Kong and Taiwan. Social Sciences, 2017, vol. 6, no. 4, art. 150, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.3390/socsci6040150.
  9. CUHK releases survey findings on views on Hong Kong’s core values. Commun. Public Relat. Off., Oct. 29, 2015. Available at: https://www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk/en/press/cuhk-releases-survey-findings-on-views-on-hong-kongs-core-values-2.
  10. Lou L.I.T. Freedom as ethical practices: On the possibility of freedom through freeganism and freecycling in Hong Kong. Asian Anthropology, 2019, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 249–265. doi: 10.1080/1683478X.2019.1633728.
  11. Chu Yun-han, Chang Yu-tzung. Confucian values and conception of democracy: An empirical study of mainland China, Taiwan and Hong Kong. Proc. Int. Conf. on the Transformation of Citizen Politics and Civic Attitudes in Three Chinese Societies. Taipei, Nov. 19–20, 2004. Taipei, Natl. Taiwan Univ., Acad. Sin., 2004, pp. 1–43.
  12. Lynch D. Taiwan’s democratization and the rise of Taiwanese nationalism as socialization to global culture. Pacific Affairs, 2002, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 557–574. doi: 10.2307/4127346.
  13. Kwan J.P. The rise of civic nationalism: Shifting identities in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal, 2016, vol. 2, no. 2, Aug/Sept., pp. 941–973.
  14. Speshnev N.A. Kitaitsy: Osobennosti natsional’noi psikhologii [The Chinese: National Psychological Profile]. St. Petersburg, KARO, 2011. 330 p. (In Russian)
  15. Strittmatter K. Instruktsiya po primeneniyu: Kitai [Instruction for Use: China]. Moscow, Ayaks-Press, 2006. 256 p. (In Russian)
  16. Ge Hua. A comparative study of the concepts of freedom/自 由 in the Russian and Chinese linguocultures. Master’s Thesis. Harbin, Harbin Norm. Univ., 2015. 51 p. (In Chinese)
  17. Mason C., Murray G. Kitai: Obychai i etiket [Customs and Etiquette of China]. Moscow, AST, Astrel’, 2009. 96 p. (In Russian)
  18. Sidikhmenov V.Ya. Kitai: stranitsy proshlogo [China: A Retrospect]. Smolensk, Rusich, 2010. 544 p. (In Russian)
  19. Konfutsii. Rassuzhdeniya v izrecheniyakh [Confucius. Reasoning in Aphorisms]. Vinogorodskii B. (Transl. and Comm.). Moscow, Eksmo, 2013. 224 p. (In Russian)
  20. Maslov A.A. Kitai i kitaitsy. O chem molchat putevoditeli [China and the Chinese. What Guidebooks Never Tell]. Moscow, RIPOL Klassik, 2013. 288 p. (In Russian)
  21. De Mente B.L. Chinese Etiquette & Ethics in Business. Singapore, McGraw-Hill, 2004. 256 p.
  22. Perelomov L.S. Konfutsii. Suzhdeniya i besedy [Confucius. Judgments and Conversations]. Moscow, RIPOL Klassik, 2017. 360 p. (In Russian)
  23. Kravtsova M.E. Istoriya kul’tury Kitaya [History of Chinese Culture]. St. Petersburg, Lan’, 1999. 416 p. (In Russian)
  24. Alimov I.A., Kravtsova M.E. Istoriya kitaiskoi klassicheskoi literatury s drevnosti i do XIII v.: poeziya, proza [History of Chinese Classical Literature from Antiquity to the 13th Century: Poetry, Prose]. St. Petersburg, Peterb. Vostokoved., 2014. 1408 p. (In Russian)
  25. Leonard M. O chem dumayut v Kitae? [What Does China Think?]. Moscow, AST, AST Moskva, 2010. 222 p. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.