Siqi Wang

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia

E-mail: 361612384@qq.com

Received April 20, 2021

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.4-5.119-128

For citation: Wang S. Language of poetry and poetic discourse (on the problem of the relationship of concepts). Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2021, vol. 163, no. 4–5, pp. 119–128. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.4-5.119-128. (In Russian)

Abstract

The article examines the essential and logical-hierarchical relationships of such concepts as poetic discourse, poetic language, and the language of poetry. The relevance of the research is determined by fact that the understanding and interpretation of poetic discourse within the framework of the scientific theory is in a state of development, the methodology of literary criticism and linguistics is evolving, and many concepts are still confused. Opinions expressed by the researchers who have studied the essence of poetic language and language of poetry, as well as support the concept of poetic discourse, are analyzed. The main results of the study include the definition of concepts of ethical discourse, poetic language, and the language of poetry in close logical and epistemological relationship with each other. Based on the obtained results, the following conclusions are made. Firstly, the phenomenal essence of poetic language is described. Secondly, the mechanism of poetic discourse development is viewed as a result of two refractions (author’s and reader’s) of the language of poetry. At the same time, the language of poetry is presented as a locus (modus) of a worldview or a linguistic worldview. Thirdly, poetic discourse is considered as part of artistic discourse, which is not only emotional and aesthetic, but also cognitive and aesthetic content. The above-given conclusions are important for the theory of linguistics and literary criticism, because they contain the rationale for the statement that poetic discourse is a level of understanding and interpretation of the language of poetry as a mode of the linguistic reality. At the same time, poetic language is a skillfully applied technological side of a special kind of creative, heuristic activity.

Keywords: poetic discourse, poetic language, language of poetry, modus, linguistic reality

Figure Captions

Fig. 1. Poetic discourse as a part of the artistic discourse and the modus of the language of poetry.

References

  1. Vinogradov V.V. O teorii khudozhestvennoi rechi [On the Theory of Literary Speech]. Moscow, Vyssh. Shk., 1971. 240 p. (In Russian)
  2. Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. Issledovaniya raznykh let [Problems of Literature and Aesthetics. Studies of Different Years]. Moscow, Khudozh. Lit., 1975. 504 p. (In Russian)
  3. Lotman Yu.M., Gasparov M.L. O poetakh i poezii: Analiz poeticheskogo teksta [About Poets and Poetry: Analysis of a Poetic Text]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPb, 1996. 846 p. (In Russian)
  4. Vinokur G.O. Izbrannye raboty po russkomu yazyku [Selected Works on the Russian Language]. Moscow, Uchpedgiz, 1959. 492 p. (In Russian)
  5. Potebnya A.A. Teoreticheskaya poetika [Theoretical Poetics]. Moscow, Vyssh. Shk., 1990. 344 p. (In Russian)
  6. Bonch-Bruevich E.I. Literaturnyi entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [Literary Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Kozhevnikov V.M., Nikolaev P.A. (Eds.). Moscow, Sov. Entsikl., 1987. 750 p. (In Russian)
  7. Vershinina N.L. Vvedenie v literaturovedenie [Introduction to Literary Studies]. Krupchanov L.M. (Ed.). Moscow, Yurait, 2016. 479 p. (In Russian)
  8. Tamarchenko N.D. Poetika: slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov i ponyatii [Poetics. Dictionary of Modern Terms and Concepts]. Moscow, Izd. Kulaginoi, Intrada, 2008. 358 p. (In Russian)
  9. Evgen’eva A.P. Ocherki po yazyku russkoi ustnoi poezii v zapisyakh XVII–XX vv. [Essays on the Language of Russian Oral Poetry in the Written Sources of the 17th–20th Centuries]. Moscow, Leningrad, Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1963. 346 p. (In Russian)
  10. Sadur V.G., Kozhin A.N., Medvedeva S.Yu. Struktura i funktsionirovanie poeticheskogo teksta: Ocherki lingvisticheskoi poetiki [Structure and Functioning of the Poetic Text: Essays of Linguistic Poetics]. Kozhin A.N. (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1985. 223 p. (In Russian)
  11. Rubert I.B., Timralieva Yu.G. Poetic language as an object of linguistic research. Izvestiya SPbGEU, 2017, no. 3, pp. 95–100. (In Russian)
  12. Bakhtin M.M. Poetic language as a subject of poetics. In: Medvedev P.N. (Bakhtin M.M.). Formal’nyi metod v literaturovedenii [(M.M. Bakhtin) The Formal Method in Literary Studies]. Moscow, Labirint, 1993, pp. 84–116. (In Russian)
  13. Zhirmunskii V.M. Vvedenie v literaturovedenie: Kurs lektsii [Introduction to Literary Studies: A Course of Lectures]. Plavskin Z.I., Zhirmunskaya V.V. (Eds.). St. Petersburg, Izd. S.-Peterb. Univ., 1996. 440 p. (In Russian)
  14. Ibragimova V.L. Language in the world of reality. Rossiiskii Gumanitarnyi Zhurnal, 2015, no. 2, pp. 145–151. (In Russian)
  15. Bobrova S.V., Knyazev V.N. The language of poetry as a phenomenon of the linguistic worldview. Nauka i Shkola, 2019, no. 6, pp. 11–17. (In Russian)
  16. Fateeva N.A. Poeziya kak filologicheskii diskurs [Poetry as a Philological Discourse]. Moscow, Izd. Dom YaSK, 2017. 360 p. (In Russian)
  17. Vorkachev S.G., Vorkacheva E.A. Discourse and its typology in Russian linguistics. Aktual’nye Problemy Filologii i Pedagogicheskoi Lingvistiki, 2019, no. 3, pp. 14–21. (In Russian)
  18. Sokolova O.V. Tipologiya diskursov aktivnogo vozdeistviya: poeticheskii avangard, reklama i PR [Typology of Active Influence Discourses: Poetic Avant-Garde, Advertising, and PR]. Moscow, Gnozis, 2014. 304 p. (In Russian)
  19. Makarov M.L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [Basics of Discourse Theory]. Moscow, ITDGK “Gnozis”, 2003. 280 p. (In Russian)
  20. Milovidov V.A. Semiotika literaturno-khudozhestvennogo diskursa: monografiya [Semiotics of Literary and Artistic Discourse: A Monograph]. Moscow, Buki Vedi, 2016. 172 p. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.