The main humorous characteristics of the anti-value concept of gluttony (based on English-language stand-up and situation comedies)

A.I. Bochkarev

Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, 630073 Russia

E-mail: arsentiy_87@mail.ru

Received August 26, 2021

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.4-5.109-118

For citation: Bochkarev A.I. The main humorous characteristics of the anti-value concept of gluttony (based on English-language stand-up and situation comedies). Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2021, vol. 163, no. 4–5, pp. 109–118. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2021.4-5.109-118. (In Russian)

Abstract

The article describes the anti-value concept of gluttony in the humorous discourse of English-language stand-up and situation comedies. The main humorous characteristics of this concept are identified and analyzed. An axiological approach is used for constructing a humorous conceptual framework, because humor is one of the most important tools for forming values and anti-values of a certain culture. The ridiculed characteristics of gluttony are divided into the following two groups: those of process and result. The main characteristics of the process include improper eating of edible items and eating of inedible items. Improper eating of edible items is usually ridiculed through eating excessive amounts of food, eating food under inappropriate conditions, eating incompatible items. Eating of inedible items is mostly ridiculed through eating life-threatening objects, eating something unfit to eat, and eating excrements or other human waste products. The main ridiculed characteristics of the result include gaining excess weight, addiction to a certain food, illness/death of a person. This work also performs a detailed analysis of the anti-value concept of gluttony for the first time. The main linguistic means of representing the anti-value concept of gluttony in stand-up comedies and sitcoms are revealed. This article makes a significant contribution to constructing an axiological humorous framework of the concept, because gluttony is one of the basic anti-values in humorous discourse.

Keywords: axiological linguistics, axiological humorous framework of concept, concept of gluttony, anti-values, gluttony discourse

References

  1. Logi L., Zappavigna M. Impersonated personae – paralanguage, dialogism and affiliation in stand-up comedy. Humor, 2021, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 339–373. doi: 10.1515/humor-2020-0023.
  2. Filani I. On joking contexts: An example of stand-up comedy. Humor, 2017, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 439–461. doi: 10.1515/humor-2016-0107.
  3. Sunday A.B., Filani I. Playing with culture: Nigerian stand-up comedians joking with cultural beliefs and representations. Humor, 2019, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 97–124. doi: 10.1515/humor-2017-0085.
  4. Karasik V.I. Yazykovaya spiral’: tsennosti, znaki, motivy [Language Spiral: Values, Signs, Motives]. Moscow, Gnozis, 2019. 424 p. (In Russian)
  5. Serebrennikova E.F. Key concepts of axiological analysis. In: Lingvistika i aksiologiya: etnosemiometriya tsennostnykh smyslov [Linguistics and Axiology: Ethnosemiometry of Value Meanings]. Moscow, Tezaurus, 2011, pp. 27–40. (In Russian)
  6. Saigin V.V. Evolution of the concept “sin” in the modern Russian language (according to the Russian National Corpus). Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo Universiteta imeni N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2013, no. 6-2, pp. 210–213. (In Russian)
  7. Matwick K., Matwick K. Humor and performing gender on TV cooking shows. Humor, 2019, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 125–146. doi: 10.1515/humor-2017-0093.
  8. Zwart H. A short history of food ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 1999, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 113–126. doi: 10.1023/A:1009530412679.
  9. Katsunova N.N. Food. In: Antologiya kontseptov [Anthology of Concepts]. Karasik V.I., Sternin I.A. (Eds.). Vol. 6. Volgograd, Paradigma, 2007, pp. 316–330. (In Russian)
  10. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, and Discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena, 2002. 477 p. (In Russian)
  11. Olyanich A.V. Prezentatsionnaya teoriya diskursa [Presentation Discourse Theory]. Volgograd, Paradigma, 2004. 507 p. (In Russian)
  12. Partington A. The Linguistics of Laughter: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. London, Routledge, 2006. 262 p.

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.