A.V. Rakhuba

Samara Federal Research Scientific Center RAS, Institute of Ecology of the Volga River Basin RAS, Togliatti, 445003 Russia

E-mail: rahavum@mail.ru

Received March 3, 2020

Full text PDF
DOI: 10.26907/2542-064X.2020.3.430-444

For citation: Rakhuba A.V. Assessment of the influence exercised by the hydrodynamic regime on the phytoplankton development and the water quality of the Kuibyshev Reservoir. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Estestvennye Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 430–444. doi: 10.26907/2542-064X.2020.3.430-444. (In Russian)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the field hydroecological observations performed within the Kuibyshev Reservoir during the period of 2016–2017. The high relevance of the research stems from the need to reduce the cyanobacterial bloom and to improve the water quality by increasing the flow rate during the summer low-water period. Among a number of climatic and anthropogenic factors that define the production processes in the reservoir, the flow rate was considered as adjustable, which is of certain value for preventing the negative consequences of eutrophication. The flow rate in the reservoir was determined using a two-dimensional numerical hydrodynamic model developed on the basis of the shallow water equations and implemented for the reservoir section on a rectangular spatial grid at 200 m intervals. The numerical modeling was performed for the depth-averaged flow rates in the reservoir. A series of model calculations was carried out, and the dependence of phytoplankton development on the flow control regime was analyzed. The impact of the hydrodynamic regime on phytoplankton development and water quality was assessed. The analysis of the observational data and the simulation results showed that the specific growth rate of phytoplankton is by an order of magnitude higher than the rate of water exchange in the reservoir. It was found that the phytoplankton biomass changes as a power function along with changes in the average flow rates of the reservoir. The data obtained confirm that an increased flow rate during the summer low-water period significantly reduces the amount of organic matter in the water and even prevents cyanobacterial bloom. The conclusion was made that phytoplankton development during the growing season is determined more by the intra-annual redistribution of the runoff than by the dryness of the year. The change of the water regime can play a no less important role in the healing of large reservoirs than the external organic load reduction.

Keywords: phytoplankton, eutrophication, water quality, hydrodynamics, hydrochemistry, numerical model, Kuibyshev Reservoir

Acknowledgments. The invaluable assistance of my colleagues from Institute of Ecology of the Volga River Basin, Russian Academy of Sciences (L.V. Tikhonova, N.G. Tarasova, and E.S. Krivina), who took part in the field study of the Kuibyshev Reservoir and assisted with the subsequent data handling, is gratefully acknowledged.

Figure Captions

Fig. 1. Schematic location of stations in the Kuibyshev, where the observations were performed.

Fig. 2. Intra-annual changes of the water height (H; 2016 (1) and 2017 (2)) and the flow quantity (Q; 2016 (3) and 2017 (4)) at the Zhiguli HPP site, according to [24].

Fig. 3. Linear dependence of Chl a on the phytoplankton biomass in the Kuibyshev Reservoir.

Fig. 4. Non-linear regression dependence of the phytoplankton biomass and the calculated flow rate in the Kuibyshev Reservoir.

References

  1. Guseva K.A. Water “bloom”, its causes, forecast, and measures to combat it. Tr. Vses. Gidrobiol. O-va., 1952, vol. 4, pp. 3–92. (In Russian)
  2. Guseva K.A., Priimachenko A.D. Phytoplankton from the headwaters of the Volga River to Volgograd. In: VOLGA-I. Problemy izucheniya i ratsional’nogo ispol’zovaniya biologicheskikh resursov vodoemov: materialy pervoi konf. po izucheniyu vodoemov basseina Volgi [VOLGA-I. Problems of the Study and Sustainable Use of Aquatic Biological Resources: Proc. 1st Conf. on the Study of Water Bodies in the Volga River Basin]. Kuibyshev, 1971, pp. 98–107. (In Russian)
  3. Datsenko Yu.S. Evtrofirovanie vodokhranilishch: gidrologo-gidrokhimicheskie aspekty [Reservoir Eutrophication: Hydrological and Hydrochemical Aspects]. Moscow, GEOS, 2007. 252 p. (In Russian)
  4. Kartushinskii A.V. Numerical modeling of the influence exercised by hydrophysical conditions over the development of spatial heterogeneities in phytoplankton. Extended Abstract of Cand. Phys.-Math. Sci. Diss. Krasnoyarsk, 1998. 22 p. (In Russian)
  5. Priimachenko A.D. Water flow as a factor determining phytoplankton development in water courses. In: Pervichnaya produktsiya morei i vnutrennikh vod [Primary Production of the Seas and Inland Waters]. Minsk, Minist. Vyssh., Sredn., Spets. Prof. Obraz. BSSR, 1961, pp. 314–318. (In Russian)
  6. Priimachenko A.D. Fitoplankton i pervichnaya produktsiya Dnepra i dneprovskikh vodokhranilishch [Phytoplankton and Primary Production of the Dnieper and Dnieper Reservoirs]. Kiev, Naukova Dumka, 1981. 278 p. (In Russian)
  7. Rakhuba A.V. Simulation of the phytoplankton biomass growth in the Kuibyshev Reservoir. Vodn. Khoz. Ross.: Probl., Tekhnol, Upr., 2018, no. 1, pp. 76–87. (In Russian)
  8. Rakhuba A.V., Tikhonova L.G. Assessment of spatial and temporal distribution of trophic characteristics in the Kuibyshev Reservoir. Izv. Samar. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk., 2016, vol. 18, no. 5–2, pp. 349–355. (In Russian)
  9. Rossolimo L.L. Water pollution and anthropogenic eutrophication of inland waters. Gidrobiol. Zh., 1975, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–11. (In Russian)
  10. Sirenko L.A., Gavrilenko M.Ya. “Tsvetenie” vody i evtrofirovanie [“Water Bloom” and Eutrophication]. Kiev, Naukova Dumka, 1978. 232 p. (In Russian)
  11.  Topachevskii A.V., Sirenko L.A., Tseeb Ya.Ya. Anthropogenic eutrophication of water reservoirs, “blooming” and ways to control it. Vodn. Resur., 1975, no. 1, pp. 48–60. (In Russian)
  12. Shpet G.I., Kubyshkin G.P. Dependence of water “bloom” on the intensity of water exchange. Gidrobiol. Zh., 1968, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 55–57. (In Russian)
  13. Dillon P.J. The phosphorus budget of Cameron Lake, Ontario: The importance of flushing rate to the degree of eutrophy of lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr., 1975, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 28–39. doi: 10.4319/lo.1975.20.1.0028.
  14. Hammer U.T. The succession of “bloom” species of blue-green algae and some causal factors. Verh. Int. Limnol., 1964, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 829–836. doi: 10.1080/03680770.1962.11895611.
  15. Harper D. Eutrophication of Freshwaters. London, Chapman & Hall, 1992. viii + 327 p. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-3082-0.
  16. Vollenwaider R.A. Input-output models with special reference to the phosphorus loading concept in limnology. Schweiz. Z. Hydrol., 1975, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 53–84. doi: 10.1007/BF02505178.
  17. Straškraba M., Tundisi J.G., Duncan A. (Eds.) Comparative Reservoir Limnology and Water Quality Management. Dordrecht, Springer, 1993. x, 294 p.
  18. Straškraba M, Gnauck A. Freshwater ecosystems. Modelling and simulation. In: Developments in Environmental Modelling. Vol. 8. Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo, Elsevier, 1985. 309 p.
  19. Straškraba M. Coupling of hydrobiology and hydrodynamics: Lakes and Reservoirs. In: Coastal and Estuarine Studies. Vol. 54: Physical processes in lakes and oceans. Imberger J. (Ed.). Am. Geophys. Union, 1998, pp. 623–644. doi: 10.1029/CE054.
  20. Bykovskii V.I. The movement of water courses and phytoplankton. Gidrobiol. Zh., 1978, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 40–47. (In Russian)
  21. Bykovskii V.I. Water movement characteristics and algae propagation. Gidrobiol. Zh., 1984, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 39–44. (In Russian)
  22. Kreiman K.D., Golosov S.D. Skovorodova E.P. The effect of turbulent exchange on phytoplankton. Vodn. Resur., 1992, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 92–97. (In Russian)
  23. Gidrometeorologicheskii rezhim ozer i vodokhranilishch SSSR: Kuibyshevskoe i Saratovskoe vodokhranilishcha [Hydrometeorological Regime of the USSR Lakes and Water Reservoirs: Kuibyshev and Saratov Reservoirs]. Znamenskii V.A., Geitenko V.M. (Eds.). Leningrad, Gidrometeoizdat, 1978. 269 p. (In Russian)
  24. Changes in reservoir levels of the RusHydro HPP. Available at: http://www.rushydro.ru/hydrology/ informer/. (In Russian)
  25. Rakhuba A.V. Spatial and temporal variations in the water quality of the Saratov Reservoir under the conditions of an unsteady hydrodynamic regime: Field experiments and numerical modeling. Cand. Tech. Sci. Diss. Yekaterinburg, RosNIIVKh, 2007. 188 p. (In Russian)
  26. Rakhuba A.V. Using the “Hiton-Volna” measuring and computing system in hydroecological studies of the coastal waters of Togliatti. In: Ekologicheskie problemy promyshlennykh gorodov: Sb. 8-i Mezhdunar. nauch.-prak. konf. [Environmental Problems of Industrial Cities: Proc. 8th Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf.]. Saratov, Izd. SGTU, 2017, pp. 484–488. (In Russian)
  27. Lund D.V. The role of water turbulence in the development cycles of some freshwater species of the genus Melosira (Algae). Bot. Zh., 1966, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 176–187. (In Russian)
  28. Petrova N.A. The role of hydrological factors in the development of phytoplankton of large lakes in the northwest of the USSR. Biologiya ozer, Tr. Vsesoyuzn. simpoziuma po osnovnym problemam presnovodnykh ozer [Lake Biology. Proc, All-Union Symp. on Major Problems of Freshwater Lakes]. Vol. 3. Vilnius, 1970, pp. 46–54. (In Russian)
  29. Petryakhina E.V., Seleznev V.A. Influence of the weekly regime for regulating the Volga water course on the mass development of phytoplankton. Samar. Luka: Probl. Reg. Global’noi Ekol., 2016, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 170–175. (In Russian)
  30. Sadchikov A.P. Production and transformation of the organic matter by size groups of phyto-and bacterioplankton (using reservoirs of the Moscow region as an example). Extended Abstract of Doct. Biol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 1997. 53 p. (In Russian)
  31. Stupishin A.V., Trofimov A.M., Shirokov V.M. Geograficheskie osobennosti formirovaniya beregov i lozha Kuibyshevskogo vodokhranilishcha [Geographic Features of Shoreline and Bed Formation in the Kuibyshev Reservoir]. Kazan, Izd. Kazan. Univ., 1981. 184 p. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.