Linguistic functionalism as a basis for the formation of reading literacy

A.N. Rudyakov

Crimean Republican Pedagogical Post-Diploma Training Institute, Simferopol, 295001 Russia

E-mail: arudiakov55@gmail.com

Received July 3, 2020

Full text PDF
DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.5.89-100

For citation: Rudyakov A.N. Linguistic functionalism as a basis for the formation of reading literacy. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 89–100. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2020.5.89-100. (In Russian)

Abstract

The theoretical and applied aspects of linguistics associated with the use of the functional approach were studied. The analysis of the interrelated problems of the formation and development of functional literacy, reading literacy, as well as perception and understanding of the text was carried out taking into account the principles of studying and describing linguistic phenomena outlined in the earlier own publications. The text was described as a major object of Russian philology at the present stage and as an instrument of social interaction, which is structurally determined by its function. The obtained results confirm the relevance of the problem of studying the patterns of perception and understanding the text as an integral object rather than a source of linguistic units of different tiers. The functional definition of the text was introduced, thereby making it possible to supplement the educational practice with a methodology of work that takes into account the need to develop students’ skills and abilities associated with the conscious and systematic extraction of information from texts of various kinds and the use of this information in their activities.

Keywords: text, function, reading literacy, perception, interpretation, Russian studies

Acknowledgments. The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-012-00271).

References

  1. Rudyakov A.N. Yazyk, ili Pochemu lyudi govoryat (opyt funktsional’nogo opredeleniya estestvennogo yazyka) [Language, or Why People Speak (Functional Definition of Natural Language)]. Moscow, Flinta, 2012. 160 p. (In Russian)
  2. Rudyakov A.N. Topory i teksty. Lingvisticheskaya instrumentologiya [Axes and Texts. Linguistic Instruments]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2013. 312 p. (In Russian)
  3. Gardiner A. Difference between “speech” and “language”. In: Zvegintsev V.A. Istoriya yazykoznaniya XIX i XX vekov v ocherkakh i izvlecheniyakh [History of Linguistics in the 19th and 20th Centuries in Essays and Abstracts]. Pt. 2. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1960, pp. 13–19. (In Russian)
  4. Prantsova G.V., Romanicheva E.S. Sovremennye strategii chteniya. Teoriya i praktika. Smyslovoe chtenie i rabota s tekstom [Current Reading Strategies. Theory and Practice. Notional Reading and Work on Text]. Moscow, Forum, 2015. 368 p. (In Russian)
  5. International program for assessing the achievement of students in education (2018). Available at: http://www.centeroko.ru/pisa18/pisa2018_pub.html. (In Russian)
  6. Formirovanie universal’nykh uchebnykh deistvii v osnovnoi shkole: ot deistviya k mysli. Sistema zadanii: posobie dlya uchitelya [Development of Universal Learning Activities in Primary School: From Acting to Thinking. System of Tasks: A Handbook for Teachers]. Asmolov A.G. (Ed.). Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 2010. 159 p. (In Russian)
  7. Snow C.E. Reading for Understanding: Toward a Research and Development Program in Reading Comprehension. RAND Reading Study Group, 2002. 156 p.
  8. Capek K. The man who could fly. In: Capek K. Chelovek, kotoryi umel letat’ [The Man Who Could Fly]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, 2016, pp. 471–476. (In Russian)
  9. Valgina N.S. Teoriya teksta [Text Theory]. Moscow, Logos, 2003. 280 p. (In Russian)
  10. Bibikhin V.V. Mir [The World]. Tomsk, Vodolei, 1995. 144 p. (In Russian)
  11. Teoriya teksta [Text Theory]. Chuvakin A.A. (Ed.). Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2010. 224 p. (In Russian)
  12. Rudyakov A.N. “Martyshka i ochki” dlya rusistov, ili v plenu otzhivshei paradigmy: doklad na plenarnom zasedanii IV S”yezda rusistov Respubliki Krym [“The Monkey and the Spectacles” for Specialists in Russian Philology, or in Captivity of the Obsolete Paradigm: A Report at the Plenary Meeting of the IV Congress of Russianists of the Republic of Crimea]. Simferopol, IP Lomarenko L.A., 2018. 32 p. (In Russian)
  13. Dinamika yazykovykh i kul’turnykh protsessov v sovremennoi Rossii [Dynamics of Linguistic and Cultural Processes in Modern Russia]. Issue 6: Proceedings of the VI Congress of the Russian Association of Teachers of Russian Language and Literature (Ufa, Oct. 11–14, 2018). St. Petersburg, ROPRYaL, 2018. 1352 p. (In Russian)
  14. Bolotnova N.S. Filologicheskii analiz teksta [Philological Analysis of Text]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2007. 520 p. (In Russian)
  15. Gal’perin I.R. Tekst kak ob”ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an Object of Linguistic Research]. Moscow, KomKniga, 2006. 144 p. (Linguistic Legacy of the 20th Century). (In Russian)
  16. Nikolina N.A. Filologicheskii analiz teksta [Philological Analysis of Text]. Moscow, Akademiya, 2003. 256 p. (In Russian)
  17. Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filosofskoi germenevtiki [Truth and Method. Fundamentals of Philosophical Hermeneutics]. Moscow, Progress, 1988. 704 p. (In Russian)
  18. Rudyakov N.A. Osnovy analiza khudozhestvennogo teksta [Fundamentals of Literary Text Analysis]. Kiev, Naukova Dumka, 1989. 152 p. (In Russian)
  19. Rudyakov N.A. Poetika, stilistika khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya [Poetics and Stylistics in Literature]. Simferopol, Tavriya, 1993. 146 p. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.