Biotic indices in water quality assessment for reference rivers: A comparative analysis of bioindication indices of the Baitugan River (High Transvolga Region)

L.V. Golovatyuk*, T.D. Zinchenko**

Institute of Ecology of the Volga River Basin, Russian Academy of Sciences, Togliatti, 445003 Russia

E-mail: *gollarisa@mail.ru, **zinchenko.tdz@yandex.ru

Received March 25, 2019

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2542-064X.2020.1.134-150

For citation: Golovatyuk L.V., Zinchenko T.D. Biotic indices in water quality assessment for reference rivers: A comparative analysis of bioindication indices of the Baitugan River (High Transvolga Region). Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Estestvennye Nauki, 2020, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 134–150. doi: 10.26907/2542-064X.2020.1.134-150. (In Russian)

Abstract

The comparative analysis of biotic indices and parameters was performed for assessing the water quality of small rivers. The small Baitugan River in the forest–steppe zone of the High Transvolga Region was studied as part of the environmental monitoring and singled out as a reference river based on its hydrochemical parameters. Using the specific combinatorial index of water pollution, it was found that the water quality of the Baitugan River at all reference sites corresponds to class II (slightly polluted). The methods and metrics of the EU Framework Water Directive (WFD) and the methods that are commonly applied in Russia were used for comparative analysis of the biotic indices. The statistical analysis of the indicator significance of the studied indices showed that the TBI (Trent Biotic Index) and the BMWP (Biological Monitoring Working Party Index) indices are mostly effective for bioindication due to their low variability in water quality assessment and consistency with hydrochemical analysis. These indices can be used for the purposes of hydrobiological monitoring of small rivers in the forest–steppe zone of the Lower Volga River basin.

Keywords: small river, reference site, macrozoobenthos, bioindication, biotic indices, EU Water Framework Directive

Acknowledgments. The work was performed within the framework of the state assignment “Assessment of modern biodiversity and forecast of its changes for the Volga River basin ecosystems under the conditions of their natural and anthropogenic transformation” (AAAA17-117112040040-3). The study was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 15-04-03341).

Figure Captions

Fig. 1. Schematic map of the reference sites of the Baitugan River.

Fig. 2. Abundance (a) and biomass (b) ratio of macrozoobenthic taxa at the sites of the Baitugan River: 1 – Oligochaeta; 2 – Mollusca; 3 – Crustacea; 4 – Plecoptera; 5 – Ephemeroptera; 6 – Hemiptera; 7 – Trichoptera; 8 – Coleoptera; 9 – Chironomidae; 10 – other Diptera; 11 – other (Hirudinea, Hydrachnidia, Aranei).

Fig. 3. Biotic indices and parameters at the sites of the Baitugan River in June 2006 and July 2010: H – bit/ind., G-WI – %, other indices and metrics – scores.

References

  1. Bioindikatsiya ekologicheskogo sostoyaniya ravninnykh rek [Bioindication of the Ecological Status of Lowland Rivers]. Bukharin O.V., Rozenberg G.S. (Eds.). Moscow, Nauka, 2001. 403 p. (In Russian)
  2. Birk S., Bonne W., Borja A., Brucet S., Courrat A., Poikane S., Solimini A., van de Bund W., Zampoukas N., Hering D. Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: An almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecol. Indic., 2012, vol. 18, pp. 31–41. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.10.009.
  3. Pander J., Geist J. Ecological indicators for stream restoration success. Ecol. Indic., 2013, vol. 30, pp. 106–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.039.
  4. Barinova S. Essential and practical bioindication methods and systems for the water quality      assessment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour., 2017, vol. 2, no. 3, art. 555588, pp. 0079–089. doi: 10.19080/IJESNR.2017.02.555588.
  5. Rozenberg G.S., Pavlov D.S., Zakharov V.M., Gelashvili D.B., Shitikov V.K. Biomonitoring for sustainable ecological and economic development of the Volga River basin territories. Ekol. Prom. Ross., 2010, no. 11, pp. 4–9. (In Russian)
  6. Barbour M.T., Stribling J.B. Use of habitat assessment in evaluating the biological integrity stream communities. Proc. Symp. “Biological Criteria: Research and Regulation”. Dec. 12–13, 1990. Hyatt Regency Crystal City, Arlington, Virginia. Washington, D.C., U. S. Environ. Prot. Agency, 1991, pp. 25–38.
  7. Leeds-Harrison P.B., Quinton J.N., Walker M.J. Harrison K.S., Tyrrel S.F., Morris J., Mills H.T. Buffer zones in headwater catchments: MAFF-English Nature Buffer Zone project CSA 2285. Silsoe, Cranfield Univ., 1996. 22 p.
  8. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off. J. Eur. Communities, Dec. 22, 2000, L 327, pp. 1–73.
  9. Johnson R.K. Defining reference condition and setting class boundaries in ecological monitoring and assessment: REFCOND background document. Uppsala, Swedish Univ. of Agric. Sci., 2001. 13 p.
  10. Kaika M. The Water Framework Directive: A new directive for a changing social, political and economic European framework. Eur. Plann. Stud., 2003, vol.  11, no. 3, pp. 229–316. doi: 10.1080/09654310303640.
  11. Bukharin O.V., Zakharov V.M., Zinchenko T.D., Nemtseva N.V., Rozenberg G.S., Shitikov V.K. Biomonitoring methods for assessing the state of an anthropogenically loaded river. Ekol. Prom. Ross., 2010, no. 11. pp. 10–15. (In Russian)
  12. Golovatyuk L.V., Zinchenko T.D. Biotic indices and metrics in assessing the water quality of small rivers of the Lower Volga region (using the example of the Baitugan River, Kamyshla River, and Sosnovka River). In: Osobennosti presnovodnykh ekosistem malykh rek Volzhskogo basseina [Freshwater Ecosystems of Small Rivers in the Volga River Basin]. Tolyatti, Kassandra, 2011, pp. 160–170. (In Russian)
  13. Rozenberg G.S. Volzhskii bassein: na puti k ustoichivomu razvitiyu [The Volga River Basin: On the Way to Sustainable Development]. Tolyatti, Inst. Ekol. Volzh. Basseina Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2009. 476 p. (In Russian)
  14. Semenchenko V.P., Razlutskii V.I. Ekologicheskoe kachestvo poverkhnostnykh vod [Ecological Quality of Surface Waters]. Minsk, Belarus. Navuka, 2011. 329 p. (In Russian)
  15. Semenchenko V.P., Moroz M.D. Сomparative analysis of biotic indices in the monitoring system of running waters in a biosphere reserve. Vodn. Resur., 2006, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 223–226. (In Russian)
  16. Whittier T.R., Hughes R.M., Stoddard J.L., Lomnicky G.A., Peck D.V., Herlihy A.T. A structured approach for developing indices of biotic integrity: Three examples from streams and rivers in the western USA. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 2007, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 718–735. doi: 10.1577/T06-128.1.
  17. Abakumov V.A., Tal’skikh V.N., Popchenko V.I., Bulgakov G.P., Svirskaya N.L., Krineva S.V., Popchenko I.I., Semin V.A., Khromov V.M., Raspopov I.M., Margolina G.L., Voronova L.D., Pushkar’ I.N. Rukovodstvo po gidrobiologicheskomu monitoringu presnovodnykh ekosistem [A Handbook on Hydrobiological Monitoring of Freshwater Ecosystems]. St. Petersburg, Gidrometeoizdat, 1992. 320 p. (In Russian)
  18. Shitikov V.K., Rozenberg G.S., Zinchenko T.D. Kolichestvennaya gidroekologiya: metody sistemnoi identifikatsii [Quantitative Hydroecology: Methods of System Identification]. Tolyatti, IEVB Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2003. 463 p. (In Russian)
  19. Semenchenko V.P. Printsipy i sistemy bioindikatsii tekuchikh vod [Principles and Systems of Bioindication of Flowing Waters]. Minsk, Orekh, 2004. 125 p. (In Russian)
  20. Zinchenko T.D, Rozenberg, G.S. Big problems of small rivers. Samar. Luka, 2012, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 209–215. (In Russian)
  21. Zinchenko T.D. Unified methods for assessing the quality of surface waters of the Volga River basin. Sbornik trudov VIII Mezhdunarodnogo Kongressa “Chistaya voda” [Proc. VIII Int. Congr. “Pure Water”]. Kazan, Nov. Znanie, 2017, pp. 119–122. (In Russian)
  22. Matveev V.I., Gorelov M.S., Rybin B.A. Pamyatniki prirody Kuibyshevskoi oblasti [Natural Monuments of the Kuybyshev Region]. Kuybyshev, Kn. Izd., 1986. 156 p. (In Russian)
  23. Ulyanovsk–Baitugan interfluve area. In: Reestr osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territorii regional’nogo znacheniya Samarskoi oblasti [The Register of Regional Protected Areas of the Samara Region]. Samara, Ekoton, 2010, pp. 96–98. (In Russian)
  24. Promakhova E.V., Zinchenko T.D., Golovatyuk L.V., Abrosimova E.V. Belozerov E.V. Hydrological conditions of rivers in the forest-steppe zone of the Volga River basin during the extreme water shortage (case study of the Kondurcha and Baitugan rivers). Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Ser. 5: Geogr., 2017, no. 5, pp. 81–89. (In Russian)
  25. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po sboru i opredeleniyu zoobentosa pri gidrobiologicheskikh issledovaniyakh vodotokov Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii: Metodicheskoe posobie [Methodical Recommendations on Sampling and Identification of Zoobenthos in Hydrobiological Studies of Watercourses of the Russian Far East: A Study Guide]. Tiunova T.M. (Ed.). Moscow, Izd. VNIRO, 2003. 95 p. (In Russian)
  26. Metodika izucheniya biogeotsenozov vnutrennikh vodoemov [Methods for studying Biogeocenoses of Inland Water Bodies]. Moscow, Nauka, 1975. 240 p. (In Russian)
  27. The method of integrated assessment of the degree of surface water contamination based on hydrochemical parameters. RD 52.24.643-2002. Rostov-on-Don, 2002. 54 p. (In Russian)
  28. Woodiwiss F.S. The biological system of stream classification used by the Trent Board. Chem. Ind., 1964, vol. 11, pp. 443–447.
  29. Hawkes H.A. Origin and development of the biological monitoring working party score system. Water Res., 1997, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 964–968. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00275-3.
  30. AFNOR NF T90-350. Qualité de l'eau – Détermination de l'indice biologique global normalisé (IBGN). Décembre, 1992. (In French)
  31. Goodnight C.J., Whitley L.S. Oligochaetes as indicators of pollution. Proc. 15th Ind. Waste Conf. Eng. Ext. Ser. Vol. 106. Purdue Univ., 1961, pp. 139–142.
  32. Balushkina E.V. Funktsional’noe znachenie lichinok khironomid v kontinental’nykh vodoemakh [Functional Role of Chironomid Larvae in Continental Water Bodies]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1987. 179 p. (In Russian)
  33. Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, Univ. of Ill. Press, 1949. 117 p.
  34. Yakovlev V.A. Otsenka kachestva poverkhnostnykh vod Kol’skogo Severa po gidrobiologicheskim pokazatelyam i dannym biotestirovaniya (prakticheskie rekomendatsii) [Assessment of Surface Water Quality in the Kola North by Hydrobiological Characteristics and Data of Biotesting (Practical Recommendations)]. Apatity, Izd. Kol’sk. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1988. 27 p. (In Russian)
  35. Wallace J.B., Grubaugh J.W., Whiles M.R. Biotic indices and stream ecosystem processes: Results from an experimental study. Ecol. Appl., 1996, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 140–151. doi: 10.2307/2269560.
  36. Semenchenko V.P., Moroz M.D., Tischikov I.G. Using the structural parameters of macrozoobenthic communities for bioindication of the quality of flowing waters. Gidrobiol. Zh., 2006, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 57–65. (In Russian)
  37. Zinchenko T.D., Golovatyuk L.V. Structure of rheophilic macrozoobenthos communities of the small Baitugan River (Lower Volga River basin). Izv. Samar. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2007, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1020–1035. (In Russian)
  38. Cota L., Goulard M., Moreno P., Callisto M. Rapid assessment of river water quality using an adapted BMWP index: A practical tool to evaluate ecosystem health. Verh. – Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol., 2002, Bd. 28, Н. 4, S. 1713–1716. doi: 10.1080/03680770.2001.11901915.
  39. Duran M. Monitoring water quality using benthic macroinvertebrates and physicochemical parameters of Behzat Stream in Turkey. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 2006, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 709–717.
  40. Rohasliney H., Jackson D.C. Lignite mining and stream channelization influences on aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages along the Natchez Trace Parkway, Mississippi, USA. Hydrobiologia, 2008, vol. 598, no. 1, pp. 149–162. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-9147-5.

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.