D.A. Cheremokhina^*, K.K. Stebunova^**

Belgorod State University, Belgorod, 308015 Russia

E-mail: ^*cheremohina@bsu.edu.ru, ^**stebunova@bsu.edu.ru

Received July 23, 2018

Full text PDF

Abstract

In line with the ideas of communicative linguistics, the text is considered as a product of discursive activity, as a means of realizing addressant’s intentions. This paper deals with the academic text, which categories and genre characteristics should correspond to the expectations of the participants of the academic discourse. It has been noted that successful academic communication arises from the compliance with the normative and communicative aspects of speech. The disagreement between the expectations of communicants entails a number of violations of a linguistic nature, which lead to the text disintegration within the academic discourse.

The violations of text formation rules have been analyzed using the examples of bachelor students’ written works (essays) from the course on academic writing. Based on these examples, the signs of disintegration are illustrated: formal use of speech patterns in secondary texts, lack of their lexical and grammatical variation, inability to paraphrase the textual content in a condensed form, “isolation” from the academic communicative act. The transition to the sphere of pedagogical discourse has been identified as a key factor of disintegration, for which reason the educational goals of creating a secondary academic text are ignored. Possible solutions of the considered problem have been also provided.

Keywords: academic discourse, academic text, scientific text, text disintegration

References

1. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language Circle: Person, Concepts, Discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena, 2002. 477 p. (In Russian)
2. Alefirenko N.F. Meaningful implications of discourse. In: Yazyk. Tekst. Diskurs [Language. Text. Discourse]. Stavropol, Izd. PGLU, 2004, no. 2, pp. 6–14. (In Russian)
3. Aleksandrova O.V. The problem of discourse in modern linguistics. In: Kognitivno-pragmaticheskie aspekty lingvisticheskikh issledovanii [Cognitive and Pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Research]. Kaliningrad, Izd. KGU, 1999, pp. 10–14. (In Russian)
4. Arutyunova N.D. Discourse. In: Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ [Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Sov. Entsikl., 1990, pp. 136–137. (In Russian)
5. Kubryakova E.S. On the concepts of discourse and discursive analysis in modern linguistics. In: Diskurs, rech’, rechevaya deyatel’nost’: funktsional’nye i strukturnye aspekty [Discourse, Speech, Speech Activity: Functional and Structural Aspects]. Moscow, INION Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2000, pp. 7–25. (In Russian)
6. Bukhbinder V.A., Rozanov E.D. On textual integrity and structure. Voprosy Yazykoznaniya, 1975, no. 6, pp. 73–86. (In Russian)
7. Sukhova E.A. Discursive practices in agriculture: The criteria of typological description. Diskurs-Pi, 2016, vol. 14, nos. 3–4, pp. 110–118. (In Russian)
8. Zubkova L.I. Constitutive attributes of academic discourse. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta. Seriya Filologicheskie Nauki, 2009, no. 5, pp. 28–32. (In Russian)
9. Tsurikova L.V. Problema estestvennosti diskursa v mezhkul’turnoi kommunikatsii [The Problem of Discourse Naturalness in Intercultural Communication]. Voronezh, Voronezh. Gos. Univ., 2002. 257 p. (In Russian)
10. Kul’tura ustnoi i pis’mennoi rechi delovogo cheloveka [Culture of Oral and Written Speech of a Business Person]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2014. 320 p. (In Russian)
11. Kotyurova M.P., Bazhenova E.A. Kul’tura nauchnoi rechi: tekst i ego redaktirovanie [Culture of Scientific Speech: Text and Its Editing]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2008. 280 p. (In Russian)

For citation: Cheremokhina D.A., Stebunova K.K. Text disintegration within the academic discourse. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2018, vol. 160, no. 5, pp. 1132–1141. (In Russian)

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.