Comparative analysis of world image peculiarities in Russian students and military personnel

B.S. Alishev*, R.I. Atagunov **

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia

E-mail: *Bulat.Alishev@gmail.com, **po4tamaila@inbox.ru

Received December 27, 2017

Full text PDF

Abstract

The image of the world is a holistic vision of reality, which is formed in the consciousness. It consists of a variety of individual ideas, all containing a certain evaluative component. Therefore, they take the form of mental images and beliefs. This paper analyzes only some of the beliefs of young men in two different fields of activity: students and military personnel (the latter is further subdivided into recruits and contract servicemen). In all groups, the belief in the danger/security of the world, its justice/injustice, the level of optimism, the level of life satisfaction, and the level of expression of some other social beliefs have been studied. It has been revealed that contract soldiers have the most specific image of the world, which is characterized by their belief in a fair world order, positive image of the self, the belief in their ability to control what is happening, and the belief in luck. These social beliefs are combined with a high level of optimism and life satisfaction. At the same time, it is the contract soldiers who perceive the world as a less dangerous “place” than the representatives of the other two groups.

Keywords: military personnel, students, world image, mental images, representations, social beliefs, perception of world as dangerous, self-image, optimism, life satisfaction

References

  1. Leont’ev A.N. World Image. In: Leont’ev A.N. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie proizvedeniya [Selected Works on Psychology]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Pedagogika, 1983, pp. 251–261. (In Russian)
  2. Leont’ev A.N. Image psychology. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya, 1979, no. 2, pp. 3–14. (In Russian)
  3. Smirnov S.D. World of images and world image. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya, 1981, no. 2, pp. 15–29. (In Russian)
  4. Neisser U. Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology. W.H. Freeman, 1976. 230 p.
  5. Rubinstein S.L. Osnovy obshchei psikhologii [Principles of General Psychology]. St. Petersburg, Piter, 2002. 720 p. (In Russian)
  6. Velichkovskii B.M. Kognitivnaya nauka. Osnovy psikhologii poznaniya [Cognitive Science. Fundamentals of Cognitive Psychology]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Academia, Smysl, 2006. 448 p. (In Russian)
  7. Kosslyn S.M. Mental images and the brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2005, vol. 22, nos. 3–4, pp. 333–347. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000130.
  8. Thomas N.J.T. Mental imagery, philosophical issues about. In: Nadel. L. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. London, Macmillan, 2003, pp. 1147–1153.
  9. Pylyshyn Z. Return of the mental image: are there really pictures in the brain? Trends in Cognitive Science, 2003, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 113–118. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00003-2.
  10. Morgan A. Representations gone mental. Synthese, 2014, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 213–244. doi: 10.1007/s11229-013-0328-7.
  11. Paivio A. Mental Representation: A Dual Coding Approach. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 1990. 336 p.
  12. Alishev B.S. The concept of representation in psychology. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2014, vol. 156, no. 6, pp. 141–154. (In Russian)
  13. Duckitt J., Wagner C., du Plessis I., Birum I. The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 75–93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75.
  14. Gulevich O.A., Anikeenok O.A., Bezmenova I.K. Social beliefs: Adaptation of J. Duckitt’s scales. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki, 2014, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 68–89. (In Russian)
  15. Dalbert C. The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 1999, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 79–98. doi: 10.1023/A:1022091609047.
  16. Nartova-Bochaver S.K., Podlipnyak M.B., Khokhlova A.Yu. Belief in a just world and mental well-being in deaf and hearing youth and adults. Klinicheskaya i Spetsial’naya Psikhologiya, 2013, no. 3. Available at: http://psyjournals.ru/psyclin/2013/n3/64003.shtml. (In Russian)
  17. Scheier M.F., Carver Ch.S., Bridges M.W. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1063–1078. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063.
  18. Gordeeva T.O., Sychev O.A., Osin E.N. Development of the Russian version of the dispositional optimism test (LOT). Psikhologicheskaya Diagnostika, 2010, no. 2, pp. 36–64. (In Russian)
  19. Janoff-Bulman R. Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Application of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 1989, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 113–136. doi: 10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.113.
  20. Padun M.A., Kotel’nikova A.V. Metodika issledovaniya bazisnykh ubezhdenii lichnosti [Methods for Studying Basic Personal Beliefs]. Moscow, IPRAN, 2007. Available at: www.psychologos.ru/ images/qXZDzKSL19_1363530805.docx. (In Russian)
  21. Diener E., Emmons R.A., Larsen R.J., Griffin Sh. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 71–75. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
  22. Osin E.N., Leont’ev D.A. Approbation of Russian versions of two scales for express assessment of subjective well-being. Materialy III Vseros. sotsiolog. kongr. [Proc. III All-Russ. Sociol. Congr.]. Moscow, Inst. Sotsiol. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2008. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/ pubs/share/folder/pjuun7fz60/direct/78753837. (In Russian)

 

For citation: Alishev B.S., Atagunov R.I. Comparative analysis of world image peculiarities in Russian students and military personnel. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2018, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 984–997. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.