The beginning of image development by the society in the interpretation of A.S. Pushkin's works during his lifetime

D.V. Tumanov

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia

E-mail: dvt1964@yandex.ru

Received April 16, 2018

Full text PDF

Abstract

The genesis of the mythologization of the biography and creative heritage of A.S. Pushkin has been discussed. Social imagery is the area of synthesis in the public consciousness of literary reputation and literary myth. The stages of its formation in the lifetime criticism and memoirs of A.S. Pushkin’s circle have been considered. It has been emphasized that the creativity and personality of the poet became for the first time of interest at the early stage of his development: the first attempt to form the literary reputation of the poet influenced not only the vector of subsequent analysis of his works, but also the trajectory of his creative work. With the active participation of the writer, his literary reputation merged with the literary myth about him. The paper shows how this construct developed as a result of the conceptual integration of the temporal experience into the spatial-visual images, semantic frames and narratives.

Keywords: A.S. Pushkin, image development in society, literary reputation, literary myth, mystification, non-fiction Pushkiniana

References

  1. Kostionova M.V. Literary reputation of a writer in Russia: Translation as a reflection and a factor of formation: (Russian translations of the Pickwick Papers by Ch. Dickens). Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2015. 523 p. (In Russian)
  2. Epstein M.N. Vera i obraz. Religioznoe bessoznatel’noe v russkoi kul’ture 20-go veka [Faith and Image. The Religious Unconscious in Russian Culture of the 20th Century]. Tenafly, Ermitazh, 1994. 270 p. (In Russian)
  3. Zagidullina M.V. Pushkinskii mif v kontse XX veka [The Pushkin Myth at the End of the 20th Century]. Chelyabinsk, Chelyab. Gos. Univ., 2001. 243 p. (In Russian)
  4. Reitblat A.I. Kak Pushkin vyshel v genii: Istoriko-sotsiologicheskie ocherki o knizhnoi kul’ture Pushkinskoi epokhi [How Pushkin Became a Genius: Historical and Sociological Essays on the Literary Culture of the Pushkin Era]. Moscow, NLO, 2001. 329 p. (In Russian)
  5. Zhitel’ Butyrskoi slobody. More criticism (a letter to the editor). Vestnik Evropy, 1820, June 28, pt. 111, no. 11, pp. 213–220. (In Russian)
  6. …ev. To the publisher of the Syn Otechestva. Syn Otechestva, 1820, July 31, pt. 63, no. 31, pp. 228–220. (In Russian)
  7. Zhitel’ Butyrskoi slobody. A reply to the letter to the publisher of the Syn Otechestva. Vestnik Evropy, 1820, Sept. 9, pt. 112, no. 16, pp. 286–296. (In Russian)
  8. V[oeikov A.F.]. Analysis of the poem “Ruslan and Ludmila”, by Alexander Pushkin. Syn Otechestva, 1820, Sept. 11, pt. 64, no. 37, pp. 145–155. (In Russian)
  9. V[oeikov A.F.]. Analysis of the poem “Ruslan and Ludmila”, by Alexander Pushkin. Syn Otechestva, 1820, Aug. 21, pt. 64, no. 34, pp. 12–32. (In Russian)
  10. Dmitriev I.I. Letters to the prince P.A. Vyazemsky of 1810–1836. Starina i Novizna, 1898, no. 2, pp. 117–263. (In Russian)
  11. P. K-v. Commentaries on the review of the poem “Ruslan and Ludmila” published in issues no. 34, 35, 36, and 37 of “Syn Otechestva” (a letter to the publisher). Syn Otechestva, 1820, Oct. 16, pt. 65, no. 42, pp. 72–86. (In Russian)
  12. K. Grigorii B.-v. A comment on the letter to the reviewer of the poem “Ruslan and Ludmila” (a letter to the publisher). Syn Otechestva, 1820, Oct. 9, pt. 65, no. 41, pp. 39–44. (In Russian)
  13. Comments on the poem “Ruslan and Ludmila” in six songs, by A. Pushkin. Nevskii Zritel’, 1820. Sept. 21, pt. 3, no. 7, pp. 67–80. (In Russian)
  14. Kutuzov N.I. Apollo with family. Syn Otechestva, 1821, Jan. 29, pt. 67, no. 5, pp. 193–210. (In Russian)
  15. Yunosha Belogo goroda. A letter to the Luzhnitsky elder. Vestnik Evropy, 1821, March 23, pt. 116, no. 5, pp. 65–70. (In Russian)
  16. Shlionskii L.I. On the problem of the definitive text of the poem “Ruslan and Ludmila”. In: Pushkin: Issledovaniya i materialy [Pushkin: Research and Materials]. Vol. 3. Moscow, Leningrad, Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1960, pp. 378–401. (In Russian)
  17. Tarasova L.V. The poem “Ruslan and Ludmila” as an expression of the author’s position of A.S. Pushkin in the context of the Russian literary tradition of the late 18th – first quarter of the 19th centuries. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Saransk, 2007. 169 p. (In Russian)
  18. Proskurin O.A. Poeziya Pushkina, ili Podvizhnyi palimpsest [Pushkin’s Poetry, or a Moving Palimpsest]. Moscow, NLO, 2001. 462 p. (In Russian)
  19. Gillel’son M.I. Molodoi Pushkin i arzamasskoe bratstvo [Young Pushkin and Arzamas Society]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1974. 224 p. (In Russian)
  20. Terts A. Progulki s Pushkinym [Walking with Pushkin]. Moscow, Globulus, Izd. Nauchn. Tsentra ENAS, 2005. 112 p. (In Russian)
  21. Shatin Yu.V. Pushkin’s discourse in Russian criticism. Kritika i Semiotika, 2007, no. 11, pp. 183–191. (In Russian)
  22. Popov V.N. N.E. Struiskii and the problem of literary reputation. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Moscow, 2011. 187 p. (In Russian)
  23. Nemirovskii I.V. Tvorchestvo Pushkina i problema publichnogo povedeniya poeta [Pushkin’s Works and the Problem of the Poet’s Public Behavior]. St. Petersburg, Giperion, 2003. 352 p. (In Russian)

 

For citation: Tumanov D.V. The beginning of image development by the society in the interpretation of A.S. Pushkin’s works during his lifetime. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2018, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 943–955. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.