Television as a subject of multimodal discourse analysis

T.R. Krasikova a*, E.A. Kozhemyakin b**

aBelgorod Administration, Belgorod, 308000 Russia

bBelgorod National Research University, Belgorod, 308015 Russia

E-mail: *tkrasikova@inbox.ru, **kozhemyakin@bsu.edu.ru

Received March 28, 2018

Full text PDF

Abstract

The paper discusses the research and epistemic abilities of the multimodal discourse analysis of television. The novelty of the research refers to the tendencies of hypervisualization of mass communications. It shapes the challenges contemporary media researcher, especially for those who are engaged in TV studies. The traditional linguistic approaches and related classical discourse analytical methodologies tend to reveal their incapacity to interpret relevantly multimodal media texts. Thus, in the TV discourse, which is multimodal by its nature, non-verbal elements play the prominent role. To analyze them means to synthesize the tools of discourse-analytical and semiotic approaches.

We have observed the key specific features of television discourse: multimodality and polycode character, personification, construction nature of reality representations, etc. We have also described the main multimodal components of the TV discourse: view, perspective, frame, light, color, composition, look, etc. The general analytical perspectives for interpretation of correlations between the TV discourse elements and the social categories of distance, interrelations, and attitude that are represented in it have been considered.

The following conclusion has been made based on the obtained results: from the point of multimodal discourse analysis, TV is regarded as a complex semiotic system, in which the elements are submitted to the general pragmatic goal to transmit the meaning structures used by TV communicators to represent and reproduce the social reality. Nowadays, the crucial goal is to develop the methodology of discourse analysis that could contribute to interpretation of the relations between the TV discursive practice elements (words, sounds, and pictures) and the social categories of social distance, domination, social inclusion and exclusion, social identity, etc.

Keywords: television, television discourse, multimodality, multimodal discourse analysis, discourse analysis

References

  1. Matheson D. Media Discourses: Analysing Media Texts. McGraw-Hill Educ., 2005. 206 p.
  2. Fairclough N. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, Policy Press, 1993. 272 р.
  3. van Dijk T.A. Discourse and Power. Macmillan Int. Higher Educ., 2008. 320 p.
  4. Dobrosklonskaya T.G. Voprosy izucheniya mediatekstom (opyt issledovaniya sovremennoi angliiskoi mediarechi) [Problems of Studying Media Texts (Experience in the Study of Modern English Media Speech)]. Moscow, URSS, 2005. 288 p. (In Russian)
  5. Uvarova E.A. Media text and media discourse: The problem of their correlation. Vestnik Moskovskogo Gosudarstvennogo Oblastnogo Universiteta. Seriya Lingvistika, 2015, no. 5, pp. 47–54. (In Russian)
  6. Barthes R. Systeme de la Mode. Univ. of Calif. Press, 1990. 303 p.
  7. Rusakova O.F., Rusakov V.M. PR-Diskurs: Teoret.-metodolog. analiz [PR Discourse: Theoretical and Methodological Analysis]. Yekaterinburg, Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Inst. Mezhdunar. Svyazei, 2008. 340 p. (In Russian)
  8. Sibidanov B.B., Ozerov V.A. Social and television roles in auditory discourse. Vestnik Buryatskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, 2014, no. 10, pp. 252–258. (In Russian)
  9. Kress G. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London, Routledge, 2010. 232 p.
  10. van Leeuwen T. Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 2008. 173 р.
  11. Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Systemic-Functional Perspectives. O’Halloran K.L. (Ed.). London, New York, Continuum, 2004. 256 р.
  12. Machin D. Introduction. What is multimodal critical discourse studies? Critical Discourse Studies, 2013, vol. 10, no.  4, pp. 347–355.
  13. Larina E.G. Television discourse and its genre diversity. Vestnik Voronezhskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznnie, 2006, no. 5, pp. 166–168. (In Russian)
  14. Dobrosklonskaya T.G. Medialingvistika: sistemnyi podkhod k izucheniyu yazyka SMI [Media Linguistics: A Systematic Approach to Learning the Language of the Media]. Moscow, Flinta, 2008. 182 p. (In Russian)
  15. Solganik G.Ya. How to attribute text and media text. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, 2005, no. 2, pp. 7–15. (In Russian)
  16. Strukova E.V. Television news broadcasts: Modeling political PR-information (technological aspect). Extended Abstract of Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Voronezh, 2010. 21 p. (In Russian)
  17. Sandler L.L. Polycode character as an immanent property of the television discourse. Media v sovremennom mire. 55-ye Peterburgskiye chteniya: Tez. Mezhdunar. Nauch. foruma [Media in the Modern World. Proc. 55th Lectures in St. Petersburg: Int. Sci. Forum]. St. Petersburg, Vyssh. Shk. Zhurn. Massovykh Kommun., 2016. Available at: http://jf.spbu.ru/conference/6081/6086.html. (In Russian)
  18. Kazak M.Yu. Specifics of modern media text. Available at: http://dspace.bsu.edu.ru/bitstream/ 123456789/8687/1/Kazak_Spetsifika.pdf. (In Russian)
  19. Shesterina A.M. Avtorskaya teleperedacha [Author’s Television Program]. Voronezh, Izd. Fak. Zhurn. VGU, 2017. 130 p. (In Russian)
  20. Anokhin A.I. Today’s Russian TV reality (based on audiovisual materials devoted to the European migrant crisis). Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2016, vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 1002–1014. (In Russian)
  21. Frolov M.E. The specifics of the implementation of the illocutionary potential of information and analytical messages in television discourse. In: HOMO MENDAX: Igra s lichnost’yu ili igra so smyslami [HOMO MENDAX: Playing with personality or playing with meanings]. Moscow, Tver, Iya RAN, TvGU, 2004, pp. 123–132. (In Russian)
  22. Schiller H.I. The Mind Managers. Boston, Beacon Press, 1974. 210 p.
  23. Deshevova V.V. Agonality in television discourse (using the material of modern Russian TV shows). Extended Abstract of Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Volgograd, 2010. 22 p. (In Russian)
  24. Pironkova O.F. “Living news” or on time and space in news broadcast. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2000, no. 8, pp. 65–74. (In Russian)
  25. Oganesova Yu.A. Expressive means of television programs on cultural and educational problems. Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Voronezh, 2014. 170 p. (In Russian)
  26. Kireeva A.V. Means of ideology construction in television news discourse. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie, 2015, no. 10, pp. 89–95. (In Russian)
  27. Yurovskii A.Ya. The nature of modern television. In: Televizionnaya zhurnalistika [TV Journalism]. Moscow, Izd. MGU, Vyssh. Shk., 2002, pp. 117–138. (In Russian)
  28. Monaco J. How to Read a Film: The Art, Technology, Language, History, and Theory of Film and Media. New York, Oxford Univ. Press, 1981. 533 р.
  29. Kress G., Van Leeuwen T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London, Routledge, 1996. 312 p.

 

For citation: Krasikova T.R., Kozhemyakin E.A. Television as a subject of multimodal discourse analysis. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2018, vol. 160, no. 4, pp. 894–907. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.