The influence of reflection on the cognitive states of students while solving creative tasks

L.A. Shayakhmetova*, A.V. Chernov**

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia

E-mail: *lesh_07_@mail.ru, **albertprofit@mail.ru

Received June 14, 2019

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2019.5-6.210-225

For citation: Shayakhmetova L.A., Chernov A.V. The influence of reflection on the cognitive states of students while solving creative tasks. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2019, vol. 161, no. 5–6, pp. 210–225. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2019.5-6.210-225. (In Russian)

Abstract

The cognitive states developing while solving verbal and non-verbal creative tasks and their reflective conditions were discussed. The main approaches to solving the problem of interrelation between creative thinking, cognitive states, and reflection were considered. Students of technical and humanitarian specialties participated in the experiment. Five questionnaires on the reflection ability, as well as Torrance's test of creative thinking and the remote associates test were used to study the impact of reflection on the cognitive states while solving creative tasks. The differentiated influence of reflection was investigated by the method of factor analysis. We identified four types of reflection that describe its subject content and regulatory level: intellectual, communicative, personal adaptive and personal non-adaptive. It was found that the states of mental tension and “mental slowness” are more often experienced by students with an average level of personal reflection. Intellectual reflection, on the contrary, reduces the manifestation of these states. At the same time, the average level of intellectual reflection increases the frequency of experiencing a state of perplexity. Personal and intellectual reflection, as well as personal adaptive and personal non-adaptive types of reflection, form dichotomous pairs, thereby affecting the distribution of states in the opposite way. Moreover, the dependence of cognitive states display on reflection is non-linear. The results obtained confirm the impact of the studied types of reflection on the effectiveness while solving creative tasks.

Keywords: cognitive states, intellectual reflection, personal reflection, creative tasks, creativity

Acknowledgments. The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (pro-ject no. 19-013-00325).

References

  1. Druzhinin V.N. Psikhologiya obshchikh sposobnostei [Psychology of General Abilities]. St. Petersburg, 2007. 362 p. (In Russian)

  2. Guilford J.P. Creativity. American Psychologist, 1950, vol. 5, pp. 444–454.

  3. Mednick S.A. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 1969, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 220–232.

  4. Torrance E.P. The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In: Sternberg R.J. (Ed.) The Nature of Creativity. New York, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988, pp. 43–75.

  5. Petukhov V.V. Psikhologiya myshleniya [The Psychology of Thinking]. Moscow, Izd. Mosk. Univ., 1987. 89 p. (In Russian)

  6. Yusupov M.G. Phenomenology of cognitive states in students. Obrazovanie i Samorazvitie, 2014, no. 3, pp. 59–64. (In Russian)

  7. Brushlinskii A.V. Myshlenie i prognozirovanie [Thinking and Prediction]. Moscow, Mysl', 1979. 230 p. (In Russian)

  8. Il'in E.P. Psikhofiziologiya sostoyanii cheloveka [Psychophysiology of Human States]. St. Petersburg, Piter, 2005. 412 p. (In Russian)

  9. Shayakhmetova L.A., Chernov A.V. The influence of cognitive mental states on the effectiveness of cognitive activity in solving problems of various types. In: Yusupov M.G., Chernov A.V. (Eds.) Psikhologiya psikhicheskikh sostoyanii [The Psychology of Mental States]. Kazan, Izd. Kazan. Univ., 2018, no. 12, pp. 111–117. (In Russian)

  10. Karpov A.V. Reflection as an integrator of the system of mental processes. Yaroslavskii Psikhologicheskii Vestnik, 2005, no. 16, pp. 5–9. (In Russian)

  11. Karpov A.V. Psikhologiya refleksivnykh mekhanizmov deyatel'nosti [Psychology of Reflective Activity Mechanisms]. Moscow, Inst. Psikhol. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2004. 424 p. (In Russian)

  12. Rubinstein S.L. Chelovek i mir [Humans and the World]. Moscow, Nauka, 1997. 224 p. (In Russian)

  13. Prokhorov A.O., Chernov A.V. Reflexive regulation of mental states. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2012, vol. 154, no. 6, pp. 244–258. (In Russian)

  14. Chernov A.V. Refleksiya i psikhicheskie sostoyaniya [Reflection and Mental States]. Kazan, Kazan. Univ., 2019. 106 p. (In Russian)

  15. Semenov I.N. Problemy refleksivnoi psikhologii resheniya tvorcheskikh zadach [Problems of the Reflective Psychology of Solving Creative Tasks]. Moscow, NIIOPP, 1990. 215 p. (In Russian)

  16. Leont'ev D.A., Osin E.N. “Good” and “bad” reflection: From explanatory model to differential assessment. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki, 2014, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 110–135. (In Russian)

  17. Kuhl J. Action control: The maintenance of motivational states. In: Halisch F., Kuhl J. (Eds.) Motivation, Intention, and Volition. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 1987, pp. 279–291.

  18. Takano K., Sakamoto S., Tanno Y. Ruminative and reflective forms of self-focus: Their relationships with interpersonal skills and emotional reactivity under interpersonal stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 2011, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 515–520, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.010.

  19. Nolen-Hoeksema S., Wisco B.E., Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2008, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 400–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x.

  20. Pyszczynski T., Greenberg J. The role of self-focused attention in the development, maintenance, and exacerbation of depression. In: Yardley K., Honess T. (Eds.) Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspectives. Chichester, Wiley, 1987, pp. 307–322.

  21. Shelepanova N.V. Reflective determination of creative manifestations. Cand. Psychol. Diss. Barnaul, 2003. 183 p. (In Russian)

  22. Ponomarev Ya.A. Ponomarev Ya.A. Phases of creativity and structural levels of its organization. Voprosy Psikhologii, 1982, no. 2, pp. 5–13. (In Russian)

  23. Prokhorov A.O., Yusupov M.G. Cognitive states in the intellectual activity of students. Kazanskii Sotsial'no-Gumanitarnyi Vestnik, 2014, no. 4, pp. 98–109. (In Russian)

  24. Karpov A.A. Fenomenologiya i diagnostika metakognitivnoi sfery lichnosti [Phenomenology and Diagnosis of the Metacognitive Sphere of Personality]. Yaroslavl, YarGU, 2016. 208 p. (In Russian)

  25. Savchenko E.V. The diagnostics of the reflexive skills on a personal level of the reflective competence. Penzenskii Psikhologicheskii Vestnik, 2015, no. 2, pp. 14–39. Available at: http://www.psychology-news.ru/2015/2-2. (In Russian)

  26. Stepanov S.Yu., Semenov I.N. Psychology of reflection: Problems and research. Voprosy Psikhologii, 1985, no. 3, pp. 31–40. (In Russian)

  27. Gutkina N.I. Classification of reflection during experimental research. Problemy logicheskoi organizatsii refleksivnykh protsessov: Tezisy dokladov i soobshchenii k nauchno-metodicheskoi konferentsii [Logical Organization of Reflective Processes: Proc. Sci. Methodol. Conf.]. Novosibirsk, NGU, 1986, pp. 49–50. (In Russian)


The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.