N.I. Fayzullina
Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia
E-mail: Nelya7@mail.ru
Received July 10, 2019
DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2019.5-6.58-67
For citation: Fayzullina N.I. Means of expressing comparative relations in vernacular riddles (based on Russian, English, and Tatar riddles). Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2019, vol. 161, no. 5–6, pp. 58–67. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2019.5-6.58-67. (In Russian)
Abstract
The ways of expressing comparative relations in Russian, English, and Tatar vernacular riddles were studied. The study is highly relevant, because the structural and semantic features of these vernacular riddles as of unique language systems and the syntactic relations developed within them have not been described. The research aims to identify and analyze the typical models of comparative relations in the corpus of vernacular riddles. Particular attention was paid to verbalization of the elements in the logical chain of comparison (reference comparison, basis for comparison).
Based on the obtained results, a number of conclusions were made. Firstly, the comparative relations in the studied vernacular riddles do not involve verbalization of all the components of the chain of comparison. The standard of comparison was present in most cases, which is directly related to the national mythologies. For the Russian riddles, comparison with a bird (raven, falcon, and swan) is typical, but the basis for comparison may be different. In the English riddles, a wide range of standards was noticed: products, various materials, buildings, and household items. Here, comparison is directly related to the lifestyle of the times when the riddle was created. Secondly, verbalization of the key elements is used to describe a certain feature (color, shape, volume, etc.). Thirdly, in some riddles comparison performs a differentiating function. In this case, the degree of feature manifestation is assessed relative to the “reference” indicators. Such texts may be not image-based and place statistics in the first place. The results of the study are important for further linguo-cognitive analysis of folklore texts.
Keywords: paremia, vernacular riddle, denotation, comparison, comparative relations
References
Abdrashitova M.O. Transformation of world modelling in modern riddle genre. Filologicheskie Nauki. Voprosy Teorii i Praktiki, 2014, no. 2, pt. 1, pp. 13–15. (In Russian)
Lazutin S.G. Poetika russkogo fol'klora [Poetics of Russian Folklore]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1981. 221 p. (In Russian)
Titova N.G. History and studying of vernacular riddles in Russian and foreign linguistics. Sovremennaya filologiya: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Ufa, aprel' 2011 g.) [Modern Philology: Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. (Ufa, Apr. 2011)]. Ufa, Leto, 2011, pp. 197–203. (In Russian)
Shesterkina N.V. Traces of paganism in Russian vernacular riddles. Vestnik Tambovsko Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2009, no. 10, pp. 176–185. (In Russian)
Palashevskaya I.V., Gorykina S.S. Cognitive and discursive characteristics of English riddle. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 2016, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 119–128. (In Russian)
Shklovskii V.B. O teorii prozy [On Prose Theory]. Moscow, Khudozh. Lit., 1983. 637 p. (In Russian)
Nevskaya L.G. Balto-slavyanskoe prichitanie: rekonstruktsiya semanticheskoi struktury [Balto-Slavic Lamentation: Reconstruction of the Semantic Structure]. Moscow, Nauka, 1993. 240 p. (In Russian)
Kondakov N.I. Logika [Logic]. Moscow, Nauka, 1954. 140 p. (In Russian)
Potebnya A.A. Teoreticheskaya poetika [Theoretical Poetics]. Moscow, Vyssh. Shk., 1990. 344 p. (In Russian)
Zolotova G.A. Kommunikativnye aspekty russkogo sintaksisa [Communicative Aspects of Russian Syntax]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982. 368 p. (In Russian)
Kazachuk I.G. Instrumental case semantics in Russian proverbs. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya Filologicheskie Nauki, 2016, no. 4, pp. 51–55. (In Russian)
Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Univ. of Chicago Press, 1987. 632 p.
The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.