G.Yu. Maltseva

Belgorod State University, Belgorod, 308015 Russia

E-mail: maltseva_g@bsu.edu.ru

Received April 17, 2019

Full text PDF

DOI: 10.26907/2541-7738.2019.5-6.23-35

For citation: Maltseva G.Yu. Playful poetics of V.V. Nabokov's story title “Tyrants Destroyed”. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2019, vol. 161, no. 5–6, pp. 23–35. doi: 10.26907/2541-7738.2019.5-6.23-35. (In Russian)

Abstract

The paper provides a detailed analysis of the features of the title of V.V. Nabokov's story “Tyrants Destroyed” as an example of the iconic sign in the light of the theory of language-game poetics. The study is highly relevant, because it offers a new way to describe the features of the title text based on language game. By considering the title as an iconic sign we focused on its semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic features.

The title of the story under study is as an autosemantic element and an iconic sign that will be deciphered in the text, but carries important prior information.

To describe the peculiarities of the title, we used the theory introduced by Ch. Morris on the triple essence of the sign. According to this theory, the title was considered as an iconic sign: its semantics, syntactics, and pragmatics were described. The semantic and syntactic analysis of the title revealed its bipolar structure, which is generally expressed as “counteraction to action”. With the help of the pragmatic analysis, the role of inclusions in the text in the form of multiple repetition of the name Hamlet was determined. Based on the data obtained by the semantic and syntactic analysis, we concluded that the allusion emphasizes the playful nature of the text and refers to the title, which acquires an additional connotation. The introduction of the precedent name Hamlet not only helps to decode the semantic content of the title, but also reveals V.V. Nabokov's critical point of view on another text – the tragedy of “Hamlet” by W. Shakespeare.

Keywords: playful poetics, title, iconic sign, semantics, syntactics, pragmatics

References

  1. Chumak-Zhun' I.I. Poeticheskii tekst v russkom liricheskom diskurse kontsa XVIII – nachala XXI vekov [Poetic Text in the Russian Lyric Discourse of the Late 18th – Early 21st Centuries]. Belgorod, Izd. BelGU, 2009. 244 p. (In Russian)

  2. Peshkovskii A.M. Russkii sintaksis v nauchnom osveshchenii [Russian Syntax from Scientific Perspective]. Moscow, Yaz. Slavyan. Kul't., 2001. xxxiii, 510 p. (In Russian)

  3. Krzhizhanovskii S.D. Poetika zaglavii [Title Poetics]. Moscow, Nikitinskie Subbotniki, 1931. 36 p. (In Russian)

  4. Arnol'd I.V. Strong stance value for literary text interpretation. Inostrannye Yazyki v Shkole, 1978, no. 4, pp. 23–31. (In Russian)

  5. Lukin V.A. Khudozhestvennyi tekst: osnovy lingvisticheskoi teorii i elementy analiza [Literary Text: Basics of Linguistic Theory and Elements of Analysis]. Moscow, Os'-89, 1999. 192 p. (In Russian)

  6. Gal'perin I.R. Tekst kak ob”ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an Object of Linguistic Research]. Moscow, Nauka, 1981. 138 p. (In Russian)

  7. Lotman Yu.M. Struktura khudozhestvennogo teksta. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta [Literary Text Structure. Poetic Text Analysis]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2016. 704 p. (In Russian)

  8. Kristeva Yu. Bakhtin, word, dialogue, novel. In: Frantsuzskaya semiotika: ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu [French Semiotics: From Structuralism to Poststructuralism]. Moscow, IG Progress, 2000, pp. 427–457. (In Russian)

  9. Veselova N.A. Literary text title: Ontology and poetics. Extended Abstract of Cand. Philol. Diss. Tver, 1998. 24 p. (In Russian)

  10. Lyuksemburg A. Vladimir Nabokov's English prose. In: Nabokov V.V. Amerikanskii period [Nabokov V.V. American Period]. Vol. 1. St. Peterburg, Simpozium, 1999, pp. 9–23. (In Russian)

  11. Rakhimkulova G.F. Language game in Vladimir Nabokov's prose: On the problem of playing style. Doct. Philol. Diss. Rostov-on-Don, 2004. 332 p. (In Russian)

  12. Peirce Ch. Nachala pragmatizma [The Basis of Pragmaticism]. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg, Laborat. Metafiz. Issled. Filos. Fak-ta SPbGU, Aleteiya, 2000. 352 p. (In Russian)

  13. Morris Ch.W. Foundation of the theory of signs. In: Stepanov Yu.S. Semiotika: Antologiya [Semiotics: Anthology]. Moscow, Akad. Proekt; Yekaterinburg, Delovaya Kniga, 2001, pp. 45–97. (In Russian)

  14. Nabokov V.V. Lektsii po zarubezhnoi literature [Lectures on Foreign Literature]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika, 2010. 512 p. (In Russian)

  15. Vanyukov A.I. Poetics of titles in V.V. Nabokov-Sirin. Izvestiya Saratovskogo Universiteta. Seriya Filologiya. Zhurnalistika, 2007, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 53–61. (In Russian)

  16. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical research. In: Wittgenstein L. Filosofskie raboty [Philosophical Works]. Pt. 1. Moscow, Gnozis, 1994, pp. 75–319. (In Russian)

  17. Vinogradov V.V. Russkii yazyk. Grammaticheskoe uchenie o slove [Russian Language. Grammatical Doctrine of the Word]. Moscow, Vyssh. Shk., 1972. 614 p. (In Russian)

  18. Telitsyn V.L. (Ed.) Simvoly, znaki, emblemy [Symbols, Signs, Emblems]. Moscow, Lokid-Press, Ripol Klassik, 2005. 495 p. (In Russian)

  19. Eco U. O literature: esse [On Literature: An Essay]. Moscow, AST, Corpus, 2016. 416 p. (In Russian)

  20. Alefirenko N.F. Lingvokul'turologiya: tsennostno-smyslovoe prostranstvo yazyka [Cultural Linguistics: Value-Semantic Space of the Language]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2014. 288 p. (In Russian)


The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.