Iu.S. Povarov

Samara National Research University, Samara, 443086 Russia

E-mail: cl-su@mail.ru

Received January 18, 2018

Full text PDF

Abstract

The paper is devoted to a systematic study of the content aspect of giving consent to a transaction in the context of the need to comply with the requirement for the certainty of such consent.

The legislative requirements regarding the content of consent, differing depending on its type (preliminary or subsequent), have been described in detail. Particular attention has been paid to the problems associated with the interpretation of the term “subject of the transaction”; two main interpretational approaches (broad and narrow) have been singled out and studied, and the logic of the narrow vision based on the consideration of the subject of the transaction as the most important but not the only essential condition has been argued for reasons of formal legal and substantive order.

The classification of the conditions of consent turns out to be as follows: a) based on their substantive focus – main and additional (or accidental) conditions associated with the “organizational” moments of the transaction; b) by the criterion of the need for indication – mandatory (or objectively significant) and optional (or subjectively significant). An accredited optional condition, in particular, is the provision on the duration of the consent; but we have justified the expediency of dispositive regulation of this issue by law.

As a perspective direction of scientific research, the problem of consequences of non-compliance with the content of consent has been assessed; as a general approach, the thesis of the absence in this case of consent (the failure to have an appropriate legal effect) has been derived.

Keywords: consent to transaction, preliminary consent and approval, subject of transaction, mandatory and optional terms of consent, validity of consent

References

  1. Vitryanskii V.V. Reforma rossiiskogo grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva: promezhutochnye itogi [Reform of Russian Civil Law: Interim Results]. Moscow, Statut, 2016, SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. (In Russian)
  2. Sklovskii K.I. Sdelka i ee deistvie. Kommentarii glavy 9 GK RF (Ponyatie, vidy i forma sdelok. Nedeistvitel’nost’sdelok) [Transaction and Its Action. Comment to Chapter 9 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Concept, Types, and Forms of Transactions. Invalidity of Transactions)]. Moscow, Statut, 2015. SPS Konsul’tantPlyus. (In Russian)
  3. Dolinskaya V.V. Consent to transaction: Problems of legislation and doctrine. Zakony v Rossii: Opyt, Analiz, Praktika, 2014, no. 12. Available at: http://отрасли-права.рф/article/16869. (In Russian)
  4. Kirichenko O.V., Nakushnova E.V., Kirichenko L.P. Legal aspects of consent to transaction. Yurist, 2016, no. 20. SPS Konsul’tantPlyus.
  5. Belov V.A. Grazhdanskoe parvo [Civil Law]. Vol. 2: General Part. Persons, Benefits, Facts. Moscow, Izd. Yurait, 2012. 1093 p. (In Russian)
  6. Levushkin A.N. Realization of the rights of spouses during the activity of the legal person. Zhurnal Rossiiskogo Prava, 2016, no. 3, pp. 47–55. (In Russian)
  7. Chashkova S.Yu. Invalidity of the transaction made in the absence of consent to its execution. Zakony Rossii: Opyt, Analiz, Praktika, 2014, no. 5. Available at: http://lexandbusiness.ru/view-article.php?id=3942. (In Russian)
  8. Bakaeva I.V. Consent to transaction: Problems and solutions. Zakony Rossii: Opyt, Analiz, Praktika, 2014, no. 12. Available at: http://отрасли-права.рф/article/16870. (In Russian)

 

For citation: Povarov Iu.S. Content of consent to transaction. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2018, vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 386–394. (In Russian)

 

The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.