E.V. Koltunov

Botanical Garden, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, 620144 Russia

E-mail: evg_koltunov @mail.ru

Received October 12, 2017

Full text PDF

Abstract

Periodic outbreaks of insects cause significant ecological and economic damage to forests. For this reason, it is especially important to study the biochemical mechanisms underlying entomoresistance, either induced or constitutive, in forest stands.

The purpose of the study is to investigate the biochemical specificity of these types of entomoresistance using the method of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). It has been shown for the leaves of the defoliated stands that 59% of fractions increased in content, while the content of 36% of fractions decreased and 4.9% of fractions exhibited no changes in their concentration. A total of 20 compounds have been identified. It has been observed that the content of the identified compounds under the effect of defoliation increased (55%), decreased (40%), or did not change (5%). The first group of compounds includes phenol glycosides (arbutin, salicin), flavonoids (isoquercitrin, luteolin, quercetin, apigenin, myricetin, kaempferol), hydroxycarboxylic acids (gallic acid), hydroxycinnamic acids (caftaric acids), and vitamins (ascorbic acid). Previously, we revealed the composition of phenolic compounds determining constitutive entomoresistance. The comparative analysis of their composition and the identified compounds of induced entomoresistance has shown a very close similarity. Therefore, it can be suggested that the parameters of induced and constitutive entomoresistance in silver birch are determined by the same phenolic compounds.

Keywords: gypsy moth, silver birch, leaves, defoliation, high-performance liquid chromatography, chemical compounds

Figure Captions

Fig. 1. High-performance liquid chromatography of chemical compounds from the leaves of silver birch at the outbreak sites of gypsy moth and beyond their boundaries: 1 – ascorbic acid; 2 – arbutin; 4 – сaftaric acid; 5 – gallic acid; 6 – salicin; 9 – caffeic acid; 11 – salidroside; 12 – 4-caffeoylquinic acid; 17-rutin; 18 – 5-caffeoylquinic acid; 19 – hyperoside; 20 – isoquercetin; 20a – luteolin-7-glucoside; 21 – isoquercitrin; 21a – avicularin; 26 – myricetin; 35 – luteolin; 37 – quercetin; 39 – apigenin; 40 – kaempferol. In horizontal direction – tR (retention time), min, in vertical direction – absorption, mV.

References

  1. Koltunov E.V. Nasekomye-fitofagi lesnykh biogeotsenozov v usloviyakh antropogennogo vozdeistviya [Phytophagous Insects of Forest Biogeocenoses under Anthropogenic Influence]. Ekaterinburg, Nauka, 1993. 137 p. (In Russian)
  2. Koltunov E.V. Ekologiya neparnogo shelkopryada v lesakh Evrazii [Gypsy Moth Ecology in Eurasian Forests]. Yekaterinburg, Izd. Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2006. 260 p. (In Russian)
  3. Doane C.C., McManus M.L. (Eds.) The gypsy moth: Research toward integrated pest management. In: Technical Bulletin 1584. Washington, DC: U. S. Dep. Agric., 1981, pp. 1–8.
  4. Elkinton J.S., Liebhold A.M. Population dynamics of gypsy moth in North America. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 1990, vol. 35, pp. 571–596. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.003035.
  5. Zhigunov A.V., Semakova T.A., Shabunin D.L. Mass drying of forests in Northwest of Russia. Lesobiologicheskie issledovaniya na Severo-Zapade taezhnoi zony Rossii. Itogi i perspektivy: Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 50-letiyu Instituta lesa Karel'skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN (35 oktyabrya) [Forest and Biological Investigations in the Northwest of Russian Taiga Zone. Results and Prospects: Proc. Sci. Conf. Dedicated to the 50th Anniversary of the Forest Research Institute of Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences (Oct. 3–5)]. Petrozavodsk, KarNTs Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2007, pp. 42–52. (In Russian)
  6. Maslov A.D. Koroed-tipograf i usykhanie elovykh lesov [European Spruce Bark Beetle and Drying of Spruce Forests]. Moscow, VNIILM, 2010. 138 p. (In Russian)
  7. Bakhvalov S.A., Kukushkina T.A., Vysochina G.I. Effect of defoliation on concentrations of allelochemicals and soluble sugars in leaves of weeping birch (Betula pendula Roth). Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2010, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 210–214. doi: 10.1134/S1995425510020116.
  8. Koltunov E.V., Yakovleva M.I. Biochemical features of birch (Betula pendula R.) constitutive resistance to damage by phytophagous insects under anthropogenic influence. Sovrem. Probl. Nauki Obraz., 2014, no. 5, p. 1–11. (In Russian)
  9. Koltunov E.V., Yakovleva M.I. The composition of phenolic compounds in birch leaves (Betula pendula R.) at the outbreak sites of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) and beyond their boundaries. Sovrem. Probl. Nauki Obraz., 2016, no. 5, pp. 1–8. (In Russian)
  10. Wagner M.R. Influence of moisture stress and induced resistance in ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws, on the pine sawfly, Neodiprion autumnalis Smith. For. Ecol. Manage., 1986, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43–53. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(86)90088-5.
  11. Ossipov V., Haukioja E., Ossipova S., Hanhimäki S., Pihlaja K. Phenolic and phenolic-related factors as determinants of suitability of mountain birch leaves to an herbivorous insect. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 2001, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 223–240. doi: 10.1016/S0305-1978(00)00069-7.
  12. Gatehouse J.A. Plant resistance towards insect herbivores: A dynamic interaction. New Phytol., 2002, vol. 156, pp. 145–169. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00519.x.
  13. Osier T.L., Lindroth R.L. Long-term effects of defoliation on quaking aspen in relation to genotype and nutrient availability: Plant growth, phytochemistry and insect performance. Oecologia, 2004, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 55–65. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1481-3.
  14. Haukioja E. Plant defenses and population fluctuations of forest defoliators: Mechanism-based scenarios. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 2005, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 313–325.
  15. Shul'ts E.E., Bakhvalov S.A., Martem'yanov V.V., Petrova T.N., Syromyatnikova I.N., Shakirov M.M., Tolstikov G.A. Effects of natural and artificial defoliation on the content and composition of extractive substances in birch leaves. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol., 2005, vol. 41, pp. 94–98. doi: 10.1007/s10438-005-0017-5.
  16. Shields V.D., Smith K.P., Arnold N.S., Gordon I.M., Shaw T.E., Waranch D. The effect of varying alkaloid concentrations on the feeding behavior of gypsy moth larvae, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Arthropod-Plant Interact., 2008, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 101–107. doi: 10.1007/s11829-008-9035-6.
  17. Martemyanov V.V., Dubovskiy I.M., Rantala M.J., Salminen J.-P., Belousova I.A., Pavlushin S.V., Bakhvalov S.A., Glupov V.V. The effects of defoliation-induced delayed changes in silver birch foliar chemistry on gypsy moth fitness, immune response, and resistance to baculovirus infection. J. Chem. Ecol., 2012, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 295–305. doi: 10.1007/s10886-012-0090-1.
  18. Barbosa P., Krischik V.A. Influence of alkaloids on feeding preference of eastern deciduous forest trees by the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar). Am. Nat., 1987, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 53–69.
  19. Bakhvalov S.A., Koltunov E.V., Martemyanov V.V. Faktory i ekologicheskie mekhanizmy popu­lyatsionnoi dinamiki lesnykh nasekomykh-fillofagov [Factors and Ecological Mechanisms of Population Dynamics in Forest Phyllophagous Insects]. Novosibirsk, Izd. Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2010. 300 p. (In Russian)
  20. Valieva A.I., Abdrakhimova I.R. Vtorichnye metabolity rastenii: fiziologicheskie i biokhimicheskie aspekty [Secondary Metabolites of Plants: Physiological and Biochemical Aspects]. Kazan, Kazan. Fed. Univ., 2010. 40 p. (In Russian)
  21. Morimoto M., Kumeda S., Komai K. Insect antifeedant flavonoids from Gnaphalium affine D. Don. J. Agric. Food Chem., 2000, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1888–1891. doi: 10.1021/jf990282q.
  22. Hammerschmidt R. Phenols and plant–pathogen interactions: The saga continues. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 2005, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 77–78. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.08.001.
  23. Kavelenova L.M., Lishchinskaya S.N., Karandaeva L.N. Seasonal dynamics of water soluble phenolic compounds in the leaves of the silver birch in urban environment of forest steppe (by example of Samara city). Khim. Rastit. Syr'ya, 2001, no. 3, pp. 91–96. (In Russian)
  24. Zaprometov M.N. Fenol'nye soedineniya: Rasprostranenie, metabolism i funktsii v rasteniyakh [Phenolic Compounds: Distribution, Metabolism, and Functions in Plants]. Moscow, Nauka, 1993. 272 p. (In Russian)
  25. Joseph G., Kelsey R.G., Moldenke A.F., Miller J.C., Berry R.E. Effects of nitrogen and Douglas-fir allelochemicals on development of the Gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. J. Chem. Ecol., 1993, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1245–1263. doi: 10.1007/BF00987384.
  26. Rieske L.K., Raffa K.F. Interactions among insect herbivore guilds: Influence of thrips bud injury on foliar chemistry and suitability to gypsy moths. J. Chem. Ecol., 1998, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 501–523. doi: 10.1023/A:1022364819779.
  27. Kazanskaya N.S., Lanina V.V., Marfenin N.N. Rekreatsionnye lesa [Recreational Forests]. Moscow, Lesn. Prom-st. 96 p. (In Russian)
  28. Hemming J.D.C., Lindroth R.L. Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: Effects on performance of gypsy moth and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia, 1995, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 79–88. doi: 10.1007/BF00328428.
  29. Sudachkova N.E., Milyutina I.L., Romanova L.I., Astrakhantseva N.V. Effect of defoliation on the growth and metabolism of Scots pine. Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2015, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21–27. doi: 10.1134/S199542551501014X.
  30. Tarun E.I. Comparing antioxidant activity in gallic, coffeic, and chlorogenic acids. Tr. Beloruss. Gos. Univ., 2014, vol. 9, pt. 1, pp. 186–191. (In Russian)


For citation: Koltunov E.V. The effect of defoliation of silver birch (Betula pendula R.) by gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) on the composition and content of chemical compounds in its leaves under anthropogenic influence. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Estestvennye Nauki, 2018, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 67–77. (In Russian)


The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.