P.E. Morozov
Institute of Mechanics and Engineering, Kazan Science Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, 420111 Russia
E-mail: morozov@imm.knc.ru
Received July 3, 2017
Abstract
An analytical solution of the problem of unsteady fluid flow to a partially penetrating well flowing at constant rate in an anisotropic reservoir with the impermeable top and bottom boundaries has been obtained. The problem reduces to a system of integral equations in the Laplace transform domain that connects the pressure drop and flux distribution along the open interval. The arbitrary number and position of the opening intervals relative to the top and bottom boundaries have been taken into account, as well as the wellbore storage effect and non-uniform skin effect. By using the superposition method, the solution for unsteady fluid flow to a partially penetrating well after its shut down has been obtained. Simulations have showed that the fluid overflow takes place through the opening intervals after a well is shut down at the bottomhole.
Keywords: semi-analytical solution, unsteady fluid flow, partially penetrating well, anisotropic reservoir, non-uniform skin effect, wellbore storage effect, “overflow” effect
Figure Captions
Fig. 1. The scheme of a layer that is partially penetrated by a vertical well.
Fig. 2. The comparison of the semi-analytical and approximate analytical solutions with the numerical solution from [19]: 1 - hd = 100 , S = 0 , Cd = 50 , z2d - z1d = 0:5 ; 2 { hd = 100 , S = 2:5 , Cd = 50 , z2d - z1d = 0:5 ; 3 - hd = 500 , S = 0 , Cd = 250 , z2d - z1d = 0.25 ; 4 - hd = 500 , S = 5 , Cd = 250 , z2d - z1d = 0.25 .
Fig. 3. The pressure field near the partially penetrating well at the uniform (a) and linear (b) distributions of the skin effect along the length of the penetration interval.
Fig. 4. The distribution of the fluid inflow along the length of the penetration interval after the start-up (a) and shut-down (b) of the well (1 – at the uniform distribution of the skin effect, 2 – at the linear distribution of the skin effect).
Fig. 5. The pressure field near the partially penetrating well with three penetration intervals.
Fig. 6. The distribution of the fluid inflow along the penetration intervals after the start-up (a) and shut-down (b) of the the partially penetrating well.
Fig. 7. The pressure filed near the vertical well in the isotropic (a) and anisotropic (b) layer at the linear distribution of the skin effect.
Fig. 8. The distribution of the fluid inflow along the wellbore after the start-up (a) and shut-down (b) of the well.
References
1. Hein A.L. Unsteady filtration of liquid and gas to a partially penetrating well with an open bottom hole. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1953, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 467–470. (in Russian)
2. Yeh H.D., Chang Y.C. Recent advances in modeling of well hydraulics. Adv. Water Resour., 2013, vol. 51, pp. 27–51. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.006.
3. Hantush M.S. Advances in Hydroscience. Hydraulics of Wells. Chow V.T. (Ed.). New York, Acad. Press, 1964. pp. 281–432.
4. Nisle R.O. The effect of partial penetration on pressure buildup in oil wells. Pet. Trans., AIME, 1958, vol. 213, pp. 85–90.
5. Seth M.S. Unsteady state pressure distribution in a finite reservoir with partial wellbore opening. J. Can. Pet. Technol., 1968, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 153–168. doi: 10.2118/68-04-02.
6. Gringarten A.C., Ramey H.J.Jr. An approximate infinite conductivity solution for a partially penetrating line-source well. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 1975, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 140–148. doi: 10.2118/4733-PA.
7. Bochever F.M., Verigin N.N. Methodical Manual for the Accounts of Operational Stocks of Ground Waters. Moscow, Gosstroiizdat, 1961. 200 p. (in Russian)
8. Streltsova-Adams T.D. Pressure drawdown in a well with limited flow entry. J. Pet. Technol., 1979, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1469–1476. doi: 10.2118/7486-PA.
9. Raichenko L.M. Flow of liquid to an incomplete well in a bed of fissile-porous rocks. Sov. Appl. Mech., 1976, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1996–2000. doi: 10.1007/BF00883491.
10. Dougherty D., Babu D. Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir. Water Resour. Res., 1984, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1116–1122. doi: 10.1029/WR020i008p01116.
11. Kuchuk F.J., Kirwan P.A. New skin and wellbore storage type curves for partially penetrated wells. SPE Form. Eval., 1987, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 546–554. doi: 10.2118/11676-PA
12. Yildiz T., Bassiouni Z.A. Transient pressure analysis in partially-penetrating wells. CIM/SPE Int. Tech. Meet., SPE pap. 21551. doi: 10.2118/21551-MS.
13. Yang S.Y., Yeh H.D. A general semi-analytical solution for three types of well tests in confined aquifers with a partially penetrating well. Terr. Atmos. Ocean Sci., 2012, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 577–584. doi: 10.3319/TAO.2012.05.22.02(WMH).
14. Chang C.C., Chen C.S. An integral transform approach for a mixed boundary problem involving a flowing partially penetrating well with infinitesimal well skin. Water Resour. Res., 2002, vol. 38, no. 6. pp. 1071–1077. doi: 10.1029/2001WR001091.
15. Perina T. General well function for soil vapor extraction. Adv. Water Resour., 2014, vol. 66, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.01.005.
16. Feng Q., Zhan H. Integrated aquitard-aquifer flow with a mixed-type well-face boundary and skin effect. Adv. Water Resour., 2016, vol. 89, pp. 42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.01.003.
17. Wang Q., Zhan H. The effect of intra-wellbore head losses in a vertical well. J. Hydrol., 2017, vol. 548, pp. 333–341. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.042.
18. Biryukov D., Kuchuk F.J. Pressure transient solutions to mixed boundary value problems for partially open wellbore geometries in porous media. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2012, vols. 96–97. pp. 162–175. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.08.001/.
19. Bilhartz H.L.Jr., Ramey H.J.Jr. The combined effects of storage, skin, and partial penetration on well test analysis. SPE Annu. Fall Tech. Conf. Exhib. SPE pap. 6753. doi: 10.2118/6753-MS.
20. Larsen L. The pressure-transient behavior of vertical wells with multiple flow entries. SPE Annu. Tech. Conf. Exhib. SPE pap. 26480. doi: 10.2118/26480-MS.
21. Yildiz T., Cinar Y. Inflow performance and transient pressure behavior of selectively completed vertical wells. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng., 1998, vol. 1, no. 5. pp. 467–475. doi: 10.2118/51334-PA.
22. Vashisht A.K., Shakya S.K. Hydraulics of a drainage well fully penetrating a leaky aquifer through a multisection screen. J. Hydraul. Eng., 2013, vol. 139, no. 12. pp. 1258–1264. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000794.
23. Chen C.S., Chang C.C. Theoretical evaluation of non-uniform skin effect on aquifer response under constant rate pumping. J. Hydrol., 2006, vol. 317, nos. 3–4. pp. 190–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.017.
24. Basniev K.S., Kochina I.N., Maximov V.M. Underground Hydrodynamics. Moscow, Nedra, 1993. 416 p. (In Russian)
25. Saad Y. Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems. Boston, PWS Publ. Co., 1996. 447 p.
26. van Everdingen A.F., Hurst W. The application of the Laplace transformation to flow problems in reservoirs. J. Pet. Technol., 1949, vol. 1, no. 12. pp. 305–324. doi: 10.2118/949305-G
27. Agarwal R.G., Al-Hussainy R., Ramey H.J. Jr. An investigation of wellbore storage and skin effect in unsteady liquid flow: I. Analytical treatment. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 1970, vol. 10, no. 3. pp. 279–290. doi: 10.2118/2466-PA.
28. Morozov P.E. Mathematical modeling of fluid flow to horizontal well in an anisotropic naturally fractured reservoir. Sovremennye problemy matematicheskogo modelirovaniya. Materialy XIII Vseros. Konf. [Modern Problems of Mathematical Modeling. Proc. XIII All-Russ. Sci. Conf.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2009, pp. 368–376. (In Russian) doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4436.5924.
For citation: Morozov P.E. Semi-analytical solution for unsteady fluid flow to a partially penetrating well. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Fiziko-Matematicheskie Nauki, 2017, vol. 159, no. 3, pp. 340–353. (In Russian)
The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.