Possible use of unmanned aerial vehicle for soil erosion assessment

A.M. Gafurov

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia

E-mail: gafurov.kfu@gmail.com

Received January 16, 2017

Full text PDF

Abstract

The paper presents the results that show possible use of unmanned aerial vehicle in the quadrocopter form factor (DJI Phantom 4 as an example) to evaluate soil erosion rates. Comparative analysis of the drone survey before and after using of the ground control points for three-dimensional digital elevation model (DEM) georeferencing has been performed. The use of four ground control points increased the accuracy of referencing to 100 times with decreasing of the height errors to 2–2.2 cm. In addition, comparison of the UAV-based model with the reference model has been carried out based on terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). The results prove the applicability of the method of evaluating gully erosion and accumulation rates by using UAV if the requirements for geodetic control are observed.

Keywords: erosion, gully, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), photogrammetry, terrestrial laser scanning, digital elevation model (DEM), GNSS, tacheometry

Acknowledgments. This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 15-17-20006).

Figure Captions

Fig. 1. An area of the tank-training ground of the Kazan Higher Military Command School (red rectangle) selected for testing the method of data positioning.

Fig. 2. An area of the Temev River basin, a stream of Vysokogorskii district, Republic of Tatarstan (red rectangle) selected for UAV-based survey.

Fig. 3. Pix4DCapture program interface.

Fig. 4. Ground control points locations.

Fig. 5. Adjustment using RTKLib for ground control point 1.

Fig. 6. Adjustment of images using Agisoft Photoscan.

Fig. 7. DEM of an area in the basin of the Temev River, a stream with the selected gully (red rectangle) obtained using the UAV-based survey.

Fig. 8. Gully rim contoured based on the results of the surveys with tacheometer (1) and UAV (2).

References

  1. Zaslavskii M.N. Erosion Study. Moscow, Vyssh. Shk., 1983. 320 p. (In Russian)
  2. Yegorov I.Ye. Field methods of studying soil erosion. Vestn. Udmurt. Univ. Ser. Biol. Nauki Zemle, 2009, no. 1 pp. 157–170. (In Russian)
  3. Lucieer A., Jong S.M. de, Turner D. Mapping landslide displacements using Structure from Motion (SfM) and image correlation of multi-temporal UAV photography. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 2014, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 97–116. doi: 10.1177/0309133313515293.
  4. Gafurov A.M., Yermolaev O.P., Usmanov B.M. Assessment of the intensity of slope erosion using terrestrial laser. Int. J. Pharm. Technol., 2016, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 14822–14832.
  5. Rishikeshan C.A., Katiyar S.K., Mahesh V.N.V. Detailed Evaluation of DEM Interpolation Methods in GIS Using DGPS Data. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks. IEEE, 2014, pp. 666–671.
  6. Vedeneyeva E.A., Gafurov A.M., Yermolaev O.P., Usmanov B.M. Assesment of the intensity of modern exogennous processes using terrestrial laser scanning. Teoriya i metody sovremennoi geomorfologii: Materialy XXXV Plenuma Geomorfologicheskoi komissii RAN [Theory and Methods of Modern Geomorphology: Proc. XXXV Plenary Sess. of the Geomorphological Committee of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Simferopol, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 401–405. (In Russian)
  7. Teo T.-A., Huang S.-H. Surface-based registration of airborne and terrestrial mobile LiDAR point clouds. Remote Sens., 2014, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 12686–12707. doi: 10.3390/rs61212686.
  8. Prokop A., Schön P., Singer F., Pulfer G., Naaim M., Thibert E., Soruco A. Merging terrestrial laser scanning technology with photogrammetric and total station data for the determination of avalanche modeling parameters. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 2015, vol. 110, pp. 223–230. doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.11.009.
  9. Al-Manasir K., Fraser C.S. Automatic registration of terrestrial laser scanner data via imagery. ISPRS Commission V Symp. “Image Engineering and Vision Metrology”, 2006, vol. 36, pt. 5, pp. 26–31.
  10. Colomina I., Molina P. Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 2014, vol. 92, pp. 79–97. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013.
  11. Clapuyt F., Vanacker V., Van Oost K. Reproducibility of UAV-based earth topography reconstructions based on Structure-from-Motion algorithms. Geomorphology, 2016, vol. 260, pp. 4–15. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.011.
  12. Turner I.L., Harley M.D., Drummond C.D. UAVs for coastal surveying. Coastal Eng., 2016, vol. 114, pp. 19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.03.011.
  13. Cook K.L. An evaluation of the effectiveness of low-cost UAVs and structure from motion for geomorphic change detection. Geomorphology, 2016, vol. 278, pp. 195–208. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.009.
  14. Tilly N., Kelterbaum D., Zeese R. Geomorphological mapping with terrestrial laser scanning and UAV-based imaging. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., 2016, vol. XLI-B5, pp. 591–597. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B5-591-2016.
  15. d'Oleire-Oltmanns S., Marzolff I., Peter K., Ries J. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for monitoring soil erosion in Morocco. Remote Sens., 2012, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 3390–3416. doi: 10.3390/rs4113390.
  16. Pineux N., Lisein J., Swerts G., Bielders C.L., Lejeune P., Colinet G., Degré A. Can DEM time series produced by UAV be used to quantify diffuse erosion in an agricultural watershed? Geomorphology, 2016, vol. 280, pp. 122–136. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.12.003.
  17. Car M., Kaćunić D.J., Kovačević M.-S. Application of unmanned aerial vehicle for landslide mapping. Proc. Int. Symp. on Engineering Geodesy. Zagreb, Croatian Geodetic Soc., 2016, pp. 549–560.
  18. Boon M.A., Greenfield R., Tesfamichael S. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry produces accurate high-resolution orthophotos, point clouds and surface models for mapping wetlands. S. Afr. J. Geomatics, 2016, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 186–200.
  19. Zhang W., Jiang T., Han M. Digital camera calibration method based on PhotoModeler. Proc. 3rd Int. Congr. on Image and Signal Processing. IEEE, 2010. pp. 1235–1238. doi: 10.1109/CISP.2010.5647253.
  20. Takasu T., Yasuda A. Development of the low-cost RTK-GPS receiver with an open source program package RTKLIB. Int. Symp. on GPS/GNSS. Jeju, Int. Conv. Cent., 2009, pp. 4–6.
  21. Usmanov B., Yermolaev O., Gafurov A. Estimates of slope erosion intensity utilizing terrestrial laser scanning. Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci., 2015, vol. 367, pp. 59–65. doi: 10.5194/piahs-367-59-2015.
  22. Maltsev K.A., Mukharamova S.S. Building Models of Spatial Variables (Using the Surfer Package). Kazan, Kazan. Univ., 2014. 103 p. (In Russian)
  23. On'kov I.V. Evaluating the accuracy of SRTM elevation for the purposes of orthotransformation of high-resolution satellite images. Geomatika, 2011, no. 3, pp. 40–46. (In Russian)
  24. Instruction on Photogrammetric Works for Creating Digital Topographic Maps and Plans. Moscow, TsNIIGAiK, 2002. 48 p. (In Russian)


For citation: Gafurov A.M. Possible use of unmanned aerial vehicle for soil erosion assessment. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Estestvennye Nauki, 2017, vol. 159, no. 4, pp. 654–667. (In Russian)


The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.